This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.

As the birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr approaches, I began thinking of what he might think about the time we live in.  I believe Dr. King would be disgusted at how his legacy is being used as a double standard, a sort of have your cake and eat it too by Liberal blacks, and how Liberal whites are prostituting his dream.

When MLK fought for civil rights back in the ’60s, there weren’t a lot of black mega-millionaires, or black industry moguls like Oprah Winfrey, Jay Z and so on. If BET existed at all, it would have only been because black people would not have been able to appear on “regular” TV.

Two score and three years later, the Liberal black man in America is still a prisoner. Liberal blacks are no longer “sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination,” as King wrote,  but have become prisoners of their own minds.

America has made good on that bounced check due to “insufficient funds,” and black people were made whole and then some. The black man is no longer an exile in his own land, as King suggested in the ‘60s. When King spoke of the shameful condition of the black man, it was real and at the hands of white Democrats. Today however, if there is a shameful condition of the black man, it is a condition of the black man’s own creation.

There can be no argument that black people have advanced to the highest possible levels in America, and black Liberals know in their hearts that the sky is the limit as far as the potential for black achievement. No longer do black Liberals need to feel disingenuous when encouraging their children that they could one day be president of the United States. Despite all the overwhelming examples of achievement by blacks however, Liberal black people still complain more than any other culture about America; calling America racist, and saying that the black man is being kept down. They are right. But it is Liberal blacks keeping Liberal blacks down.

Black Liberals are conditioned to complain, the same way a child tries to get his way. Meanwhile millions of illegal immigrants stream across our borders happy to trade places with any American and millions more line up legally to do so. All over the world, the longest line of any embassy line is the line at the American embassy. MLK would smile that America remains the country that people all over the world still fight to get to.

MLK would have seen Obama’s squander of trillions of dollars as wasteful, wholly ineffective, and completely antithetical to his dream. King would recognize what Obama has done by pilfering the taxpayer as the purchase of the poverty industry, and the writing of more checks destined to bounce.

If King were alive today, he would explain that we live in a time where America is losing jobs by the thousands every week, when one million people had their homes seized and five million more have the same fate pending, and that Obama’s promissory note is as good as Obama’s word. The content of one’s character.

King would have still have a dream today.  He wouldn’t want black people dependent on the government.  As before, King would want black people to get a fair chance at the American dream as promised by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

America is a very different America today, than when Democrats were writing oppressive laws against black people. King would be overjoyed to see that in “Alabama little black boys and black girls [sic] will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.”

“For Whites Only” is a thing of the past, and King would rejoice that in America today “justice rolls down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

King’s legacy extends beyond the gains made by blacks today, gains that are being squandered in a mad money grab by Leftist politicians, black and white. King’s legacy has manifested itself into a group hated by the Left, as much as blacks were hated by the Left back in the ‘60s. King dream today would undoubtedly be a vision of Tea Party movement.

King talked about the “fierce urgency of now.” How true those words remain to this day.  King recognized the tyrannical nature of the government, and he would be standing shoulder to shoulder with Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Herman Cain, Allen West, and many others in an attempt to free not only blacks this time, but the entire nation from the very same government that was oppressing blacks during King’s lifetime.

King would recognize that the oppression of government had not ended, but only shifted in an attempt to seize the entire nation; morphing as a virus would morph in order to survive in its host.

King would recognize the disease that has us discussing America’s racism in a time when America has a black president.  King would understand that a government suing one of its states for protecting the American dream can only be a malady of the brain, or a blatant sign of a government intent on enslavement of its citizens.

As King said back then, “We cannot walk alone…we cannot turn back.”

Today, King would hear freedom’s ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire, mighty mountains of New York, from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania, from the snow-capped Rockies of Colorado, from the curvaceous slopes of California, from Stone Mountain of Georgia, from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee, and from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. Because the Tea Party people would be with him shouting, “Let freedom ring.”

That’s my rant!

(c) 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Kevin Jackson is the author of the Amazon best-selling book The BIG Black Lie and The Black Sphere blog.

Tags

 
 
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Brenna Chapman

    behind you 100%, man!!! More people should read/listen to you!!

    • theblacksphere

      Thanks Brenna! I appreciate the kind words. God is blessing me, and I may end up with a huge Fox Radio audience soon enough.

      • auntiemadder

        Fox Radio? Radio-shmadio. Fox should send O'Reilly's left-spinning butt to radio and give you his cable tv time slot. I'm not the only one who'd tune in to your program. But, I suppose you have to take it a step at a time. Tomorrow, radio. The next day, cable TV.

        • theblacksphere

          I hope to have a TV show, sooner than you think.

  • Wendi Lynn G

    Kevin, truly one of your best, my friend. :)

    • theblacksphere

      Thanks, Wendi. I agree. When I think of the people who believe that Obama is part of the King legacy, I want to throw up.

  • nohammernosickl

    Kevin, we have much to be thankful for in this country, and the legacy of Martin Luther King is right at the top.

    But we cannot give up and declare King's victory yet, even though his vision has triumphed in the hearts and minds of nearly all Americans. The Democrats and the unions that were once standing in front of the school buildings to keep the black kids out are now standing in front of the buildings to keep the black kids in their crappy government monopolized schools. Until parents can more easily move their kids to better schools than the ones that are in the bad neighborhoods, the culture of poverty will persist. I truly believe that school choice is the most important civil rights issue of our time.

    • theblacksphere

      Hey no argument out of me. Wait until you read my next book. Conservatives will love it. Democrats will hate it. Republicans will love and hate it! It's a FANTASTIC read!

  • rob theiss

    Exceptional post, Kevin. Outstanding….What would MLK think today to see scoundrels like Sharpton and others prostituting his words, his dream, his courage and his legacy in their disgraceful, selfish manner? We need more people like you with voices loud and proud, honest and sure. Always enjoy your segments with Jamie Allman here in St Louis, but we need more!

    • theblacksphere

      MLK would be appalled!

  • culturalstrategist

    [quote] it is a condition of the black man’s own creation[/quote]

    Please allow me to slightly alter your word "creation".

    Whereas the defacto state of man is "poverty" only the SYSTEM which he actively constructs around him and his community can leverage the human resources to assemble a measurable quantity of that which that same system recognizes as "wealth" .

    The Progressive-Fundamentalist receives his power from making INDICTMENTS against their enemy. As such it is not an organic ideology. Leave it all alone by itself and the factions would feed on themselves. The retain "Ideological Unity" via their agreement to look outward and go through the motions of indictment.

    As I listen to various people debate their present standing they adopt some perfect reference (ie: the NUL views White people as their "1.0" reference to which they measure Black people in their annual "State Of Black America" Report) to which they compare themselves to. Where there is a deficit this proves to be evidence of 'injustice'. Without the valuation of the knowledge of fishing over the final state of "being in receipt of fish" – they cast their fortunes on obtaining their equal load of fish by enumerating RIGHTS that are due to them per their "national social contract" that they have identified in common with their target.

    Instead of seeing this as a condition that they have CREATED – it is more accurate to say that in their IDEOLOGICALLY BIGOTED BLINDNESS they failed to tap into their collective community's potential and "equality" by focusing upon building up the systems infrastructure within which their people's talents would be leveraged to construct the favorable outcomes that they seek.

    The talent to lead a "social justice march" is focused upon getting SOME EXTERNAL POWER to change their ways so that you and your people can get relief

    The talent of 'Human Resource Management", however, is an INWARD focus. It seek the people to make inventory of themselves and then make measure of WHERE THEY WANT TO GO – clarifying the attributes of what this "Promised Land" looks like. Above all the need for LOGISTICAL SKILLS by which the emotional buy in that is tapped from the people is verified to be in support of THEIR OWN permanent interests and NOT in support of the VEHICLE that they chose to ride upon that purports to get there.

    Those of their people who see the sign to the "Promised Land" but see that their "donkey" or "elephant" has kept going, remaining on the highway which is destined for a longer scenic route are the ones who have proven themselves to be more committed to their partisan ideology than what they have presented themselves as interest to their own community.

    • theblacksphere

      The government doesn't teach people to think, and in fact don't really want to. My next book deals with this subj.

  • Jacques

    Kevin,

    Thanks for the post — but do correct the "four score" to "two score." I like the Lincoln resonance, but a score is 20, and it's 43 years you have in mind, I think.

    Jacques

    • theblacksphere

      Great point Jacques!

  • auntiemadder

    "King would recognize that the oppression of government had not ended…"

    …it's just been packaged and marketed differently. Instead of govt working overtly and aggressively against black Americans, govt appears to be working aggressively for black Americans, when in reality, it's all working covertly against them. Worse, and only slightly off topic, is that libtarded govt is doing the same "for" other groups, such as Mexican-Americans, illegal aliens, Muslims, and whites who are poverty-stricken by multiple generations. If he were to see them living as wards or slaves of the govt, and of Demonrats in particular, I think MLK would be ticked off at all of them and ticked off on behalf of all of them, too.

    • theblacksphere

      You quoted my words! Great addition to my point…

  • Steve

    THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for posting this! I LOVE your blog!

    Steve
    Common Cents http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com

    ps. Link Exchange??

  • Good Mojo

    That was AWESOME!

  • http://http:/zillablog.marezilla.com Zilla

    Great post, Kevin, I quoted from it at my blog here: http://zillablog.marezilla.com/2011/01/martin-lut
    My recent post Martin Luther King Jr Day – some thoughts and links

  • Greg Painter

    Kevin,

    I'm never diappointed with your take on things! That was beautiful!!! Thank you!!!

  • http://americanandproud.net Robert

    This needs to be WALLPAPERED and CARPET BOMBED everywhere in the world. Spot on IMO Kevin. But I'm not surprised.

    I posted an excerpt of this at my site linked back to you… Maybe you'll get a few more fans, you may even like one or two of them :-(
    My recent post MLK’s REAL Legacy

  • LMA

    Kevin,

    Dr. King would have encouraged you to speak your mind; however, you've missed his greater message. It's such a shame that you've obviously drawn a line within the black community between those who are apparently (in your mind) worthy of his legacy and those who are not. Dr. King would not have done that, and that was his greatest gift. Your approving readers are probably more excited about the smackdown you deliver to liberals than anything else. My guess is the true meaning of Dr. King's sacrifice is lost on them, as it is on you.

    • auntiemadder

      I don't see that Kevin's said that some black Americans are worthy of MLK's legacy and others aren't. Instead, it reads to me that he's saying that some have chosen not to live up to their potential and choose to dismiss the opportunities open to them, many of those opportunities are due, in great part, to the work MLK dedicated his life to and even died doing. Worse, his legacy is being used to enable them to dismiss those opportunities and to ignore their potential. And MLK would be disgusted by the misuse of his legacy and by those who don't make the best of the opportunities he helped make available to them.

  • thatmrgguy

    LMA, I think perhaps you missed the whole point of the essay. I would hope that you will read it again and this time, use your reading comprehension skills.

    Mike
    My recent post John Edwards New Jail Roommate For Tom Delay

    • LMA

      Mike, your reply makes my point.

      Kevin, you might enjoy the essay The Root recently published about Zora Neale Hurston, a black Conservative woman. Don't worry — the article is quite complimentary.

  • Guest

    I hate to pop your bubble when it comes to MLK but after researching MLK for a while, the following applies:1. MLK plagaried his doctoral thesis 2. MLK committed adultery and used prostitutes- on the night before his death 3. His secretary was a member of the communist party for 5 years 4. MLK surrounded himself with members of the communist party 5. MLK considered the majority of whites racist and supported quotas for blacks 6. MLK doubted several core beliefs of Christianity 7. King often told lewd jokes,shared women with friends, and was sexually reckless 8. King’s widow successfully lobbied congress to seal the FBI’s records on King for fifty years – so you have to ask yourself why.
    Now, you may well get angry with me for tarnishing MLK's saintly profile, but you can hardly dispute the facts as per the FBI; Universities; auto-biographers and friends.

    • LMA

      "Guest,"

      This propaganda (and even the word "propaganda" elevates the smut you've regurgitated here) has been debunked time and time again.

      • Larry

        Then please debunk this "propaganda." You can't. Everything Guest said is true and can be documented by reading the writings of King's associates and just looking at King's own words. The idea that someone who was joined at the hip with Jesse Jackson was a conservative is absolutely moronic.

    • auntiemadder

      No, but I can damned well dispute someone who states those to be the facts without offering any proof or citing any specific sources. ("His secretary and the FBI said so" does not constitute specific source(s) cited.)

      • Larry

        You want "sources"? Go read anything written by King's close friend Ralph Abernathy. King was an adulterer, a whoremongerer, and a black supremacist. Sorry to burst your fantasy world.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    Kev, and all:

    Please read my comments on this thread at Gateway Pundit.
    http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2011/01/on-

    Just look for the little orange lighthouse pic, and the name Taqiyyotomist.

  • Larry

    This post is laughable silly. No one who honestly studies history could possibly come to the conclusion that MLK was a conservative. MLK even went so far as to compare Barry Goldwater, the father of modern day conservatism, to Hitler. Conservatives just make themselves look silly by peddling this nonsense. If MLK was a conservative, then the word has no meaning.

    Were a lot of Democrats in the 50s "racist"? Yes. But so were a lot of Republicans. The parties have shifted dramatically over the past 60 years. You can't compare either party of today with their 1950s namesake. In fact, up until the Goldwater revolution, the GOP was typically to the left of the Democratic Party. You people need to open a history book and turn off the Glenn Beck, And I'm saying this as a conservative.

    • auntiemadder

      That's a load of shit. The Demonrats have fought every piece of civil rights legislation written.

      The Democrat Race Lie at Bob Parks’ Black & White blog http://www.black-and-right.com/the-democrat-race-

      August 8, 1945
      Republicans condemn Harry Truman’s surprise use of the atomic bomb in Japan. The whining and criticism goes on for years. It begins two days after the Hiroshima bombing, when former Republican President Herbert Hoover writes to a friend that “The use of the atomic bomb, with its indiscriminate killing of women and children, revolts my soul.”

      • auntiemadder

        September 30, 1953
        Earl Warren, California’s three-term Republican Governor and 1948 Republican vice presidential nominee, nominated to be Chief Justice; wrote landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education

        November 25, 1955
        Eisenhower administration bans racial segregation of interstate bus travel

        March 12, 1956
        Ninety-seven Democrats in Congress condemn Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Board of Education, and pledge to continue segregation

        • auntiemadder

          June 5, 1956
          Republican federal judge Frank Johnson rules in favor of Rosa Parks in decision striking down “blacks in the back of the bus” law

          November 6, 1956
          African-American civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Ralph Abernathy vote for Republican Dwight Eisenhower for President

          September 9, 1957
          President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republican Party’s 1957 Civil Rights Act

          September 24, 1957
          Sparking criticism from Democrats such as Senators John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, President Dwight Eisenhower deploys the 82nd Airborne Division to Little Rock, AR to force Democrat Governor Orval Faubus to integrate public schools

          • auntiemadder

            May 6, 1960
            President Dwight Eisenhower signs Republicans’ Civil Rights Act of 1960, overcoming 125-hour, around-the-clock filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats

            May 2, 1963
            Republicans condemn Democrat sheriff of Birmingham, AL for arresting over 2,000 African-American schoolchildren marching for their civil rights

            September 29, 1963
            Gov. George Wallace (D-AL) defies order by U.S. District Judge Frank Johnson, appointed by President Dwight Eisenhower, to integrate Tuskegee High School

            June 9, 1964
            Republicans condemn 14-hour filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act by U.S. Senator and former Ku Klux Klansman Robert Byrd (D-WV), who still serves in the Senate
            Note: Byrd served until last year, when the Grim Reeper finally removed his racist, KKK @$$ from the Senate.

          • auntiemadder

            June 10, 1964
            Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) criticizes Democrat filibuster against 1964 Civil Rights Act, calls on Democrats to stop opposing racial equality. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was introduced and approved by a staggering majority of Republicans in the Senate. The Act was opposed by most southern Democrat senators, several of whom were proud segregationists—one of them being Al Gore Sr. Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson relied on Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen, the Republican leader from Illinois, to get the Act passed.

            August 4, 1965
            Senate Republican Leader Everett Dirksen (R-IL) overcomes Democrat attempts to block 1965 Voting Rights Act; 94% of Senate Republicans vote for landmark civil right legislation, while 27% of Democrats oppose. Voting Rights Act of 1965, abolishing literacy tests and other measures devised by Democrats to prevent African-Americans from voting, signed into law; higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats vote in favor

          • auntiemadder

            February 19, 1976
            President Gerald Ford formally rescinds President Franklin Roosevelt’s notorious Executive Order authorizing internment of over 120,000 Japanese-Americans during WWII

            September 15, 1981
            President Ronald Reagan establishes the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities, to increase African-American participation in federal education programs

            June 29, 1982
            President Ronald Reagan signs 25-year extension of 1965 Voting Rights Act

            August 10, 1988
            President Ronald Reagan signs Civil Liberties Act of 1988, compensating Japanese-Americans for deprivation of civil rights and property during World War II internment ordered by FDR

          • auntiemadder

            November 21, 1991
            President George H. W. Bush signs Civil Rights Act of 1991 to strengthen federal civil rights legislation

            August 20, 1996
            Bill authored by U.S. Rep. Susan Molinari (R-NY) to prohibit racial discrimination in adoptions, part of Republicans’ Contract With America, becomes law

            What? You don’t believe the word of Bob Parks of the Black & Right blog? Well, then, below is an excerpt from BLACK REPUBLICANS MAKE HISTORY by Frances Rice, a retired lawyer and Army Lieutenant Colonel, is chairman of the National Black Republican Association .

          • auntiemadder

            “A laughable feature of the media’s reporting on Tim Scott is the assertion by liberal journalists that Republicans had to overcome their racism in order to nominate Scott. The reporters used the racist past of South Carolina as the basis for their slam against Republicans. Never mind the fact that the Democratic Party controlled South Carolina for over 100 years after the Civil War, and it was the Democrats who were discriminating against blacks. As is explained in the article”The Myth of the Racist Republicans” by Gerard Alexander that is posted on the Claremont Institute’s website, the 30-year odyssey of the South switching to the Republican Party begun in the 1970′s by Richard Nixon was not an appeal to the racists.

          • auntiemadder

            In a 2002 article posted on the Internet, the co-architect of Nixon’s Southern Strategy, Pat Buchanan, explained the genesis and purpose of the strategy. Buchanan wrote that Nixon declared that the Republican Party would be built on a foundation of states rights, human rights, small government and a strong national defense, and leave it to the Democratic Party – the party of Maddox, Mahoney and Wallace — to “squeeze the last ounce of political juice out of the rotting fruit of racial injustice.”

            The racist Democrats (some of whom became known as “Dixiecrats” when they formed the “State’s Rights Democratic Party” just for the 1948 election) did not all join the Republican Party- the party of freedom and equality for blacks. In fact, those racists declared they would rather vote for a “yellow dog” than a Republican. Sadly, most blacks today have taken on the hatred for the Republican Party from the Democrats without understanding the origin of that hatred.

          • auntiemadder

            Once Democrats cease their insidious racism toward black Republicans, all black Americans will be free to stop having their vote taken for granted, seize control over their own destiny and vote for candidates based on the content of their policies, not merely the label of their party.” http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/black-r

            I could go on, but you either get it by now or you choose not to.

  • J.D. Fletcher

    Larry, you're no conservative no matter what you call yourself. All of the labels have been screwed up and flipped around since the 60's. MLK was a liberal, but a liberal in the classical sense, not the modern "give-me-give-me-give-me" sense. Many of us who are now "conservative" are in fact like this.

    Oh, and like it or not, Beck has taught more Black history on his show than most people have seen in 13 years of formal education.

    And for Anonymous Coward who is attempting to make us "feel bad" about MLK being a flawed human being, go back to your backwoods hell hole. Yeah, MLK was a flawed human being. So what? He led a movement that kept my people from being perpetual third class citizens in the land of their birth, and for that we will always be grateful. Damn sure your ancestors wouldn't have helped us.

  • Mbarassed 4u

    What a disgrace to compare Martin Luther King to the likes of the Tea Party.