This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.
Obama_Santa

Once upon a time there was a Santa Claus who happened to be white. Nobody really thought about Santa Claus being white, just that he brought joy to all the boys and girls all over the world.  But then these mean people called Progressive Liberal Utopians (Plutopians) decided that the world needed changing, since White Santa neglected the little Jews and Muslims, and his practices oppressed minority children.  The time had come for a politically correct Black Santa.

Though Black Santa’s resume was light, it was said he would bring even more joy to the world…the entire world.  The people loved Black Santa, because he was not portly and rotund like White Santa; Black Santa was tall and lean, dare I say sexy. Black Santa began his tenure traveling the world apologizing for White Santa’s oppression of them.

Black Santa was an idealist, and he promised people whatever they wanted. In the land of Black Santa, unicorns poop butterflies and cough rainbows, and there is no need for money. You just wish upon a black star.

Black Santa created a world where Christmas was free of the shackles of religious significance, and thus be deemed, “The Holiday Season of X-mas.” X-mas now meant the redistribution of toys from others to all black boys and girls by Black Santa.  America had entered the “Dark Ages of X-Mas.”

The first X-mas of Black Santa was uneventful, as “It’s White Santa’s Fault.” Black Santa used White Santa’s lame duck period to assess the operation and make his recommendations.  Black Santa had a year to contemplate how to “pay that woman’s rent and car note,” and implement the change the North Pole would need.

Though there was no budget or need, Black Santa hired 41 new black elves and he called them Santa’s Black Caucus. Santa’s Black Caucus bickered a lot, and were constantly asking for more.  They demanded that all toys be white, and wanted reparations, saying “White chirrens got more toys than black chirrens in the past, and this must be corrected.”

Santa’s Black Caucus wasn’t his only issue, as the environmentalists demanded that Black Santa implement green policies at the factory, demanding the use of solar and wind power to replace fossil fuels.  This policy led to black outs at the factory.

Black Santa’s operation hit hard times, and he was forced to make cut backs.  Black Santa made the working conditions untenable for the original hardworking elves, so they all quit and were ineligible for unemployment benefits.

The second X-mas was even worse.  Santa had no solution for reviving the factory, though he talked a good game.  Black Santa held lots of meetings constantly taking the sled all over the country for “listening tours.” The reindeer complained about their increased work load, citing that Black Santa took ten times more vacations than White Santa.  Word at the Pole was that Black Santa was lazy.

The white elves had transitioned to capitalism, running “White Market” businesses where they imported most of their goods from China.  This significantly impacted the toy trade, and put a serious dent in Black Santa’s now almost non-existent supply-chain.

Black boys and girls began grumbling that they were getting less from Black Santa, than they got from White Santa.

Year Three was by far the worst.  Now the white elves were dominating production, finding new markets abroad. Previous believers in Black Santa were getting their goods from the elves.  Black Santa had created record unemployment (34 straight months of unemployment above 8%), record deficits ($15T+), and record spending with nothing to show for it. Then there was that snafu of delivering the $10M drone to the wrong recipient.  It was evident to most that Black Santa was in way over his head.

White Santa was at a BET Awards ceremony, where he commented:

I’m shocked at the incompetence of Black Santa.  In all my years of being Santa, we never missed a single gift, and the gifts were delivered on time, and not on CPT. This latest incident of delivering a $10M gift to a hostile foreign nation is beyond the pale. I think somebody needs to look into that. And don’t even get me started on the weapons delivered to those Mexican bandidos. Y’all gon’ make me lose my mind up in here!

With no toy manufacturing in the North Pole, Black Santa was forced to go straight up gangsta, stealing toys. Black Santa issues executive orders that essentially allowed union thugs to just take toys of the white elves trucks straight to flea markets.

Black Santa’s Justice Elf Holder said that anybody stopping black drivers and asking for proper ID would be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

It seems nothing is working, and the factory has all but shut down.  Black Santa has been forced to lay off the Black elves. The good news is they still get full pay and benefits.

Tune in next year for what will be the final year of The Dark Age of X-Mas…

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

 

It's FINALLY HERE!
Kevin Jackson's hilarious take on Race-Pimping: The Multi-Trillion Dollar Business of Liberalism!

Enjoy this excerpt from the book:

"The money in diversity is enormous, even bigger than former sportscaster turned political pundit turned sportscaster Keith Olbermann’s ego. Wouldn’t you like to be a “reverend” and father children out of wedlock without repercussions? If you study hard, this book will teach you how to have your non-profit organization pay your mistress and your child support – all at the same time. You must be so black that if you eat sushi, watch reruns of Dawson’s Creek and Friends, or enjoy the ballet, you will hang yourself."

Pre-Order Now!
 
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

  • ant

    Only 364 days 'til the Mayan calendar's last forcast day expires. and, coincidentally, the day (Dec 22) when we had exactly one year til the supposed end, our National debt has officially exceeded our GDP. Either way, cheers to having a year without a Black Santa Claus in 2012.

    • theblacksphere

      LMBO Ant! I guess either way it works out! Too funny!

  • Middle Thinker

    Totally baseless, tasteless….and not all the way true.

    After all, we still are under the Bush Tax Cuts, and the President has voted in legislation approved by republicans to increase job growth….where are the jobs.

    Vacation time. The only POTUS in the last 30 years to take less time at this juncture in his presidency than Obama was President Clinton.

    Corporate flight overseas occurred long before President Obama sat in 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Yet in the last jobs bills Republicans favored MORE free trade to South Korea and other Asian countries.

    The elves..or it CBC? Weren't they the same ones you expected to speak in favor or Herman Cain in your last whine…whoops, I mean rant?

    Your quote:
    <<Black Santa began his tenure traveling the world apologizing for White Santa’s oppression of them>>

    Did you show any outrage for Rev. Wayne Perryman who filed a lawsuit against the Democratic Party and asking for what: an apology from then? Or is this just the typical black conservative double-standard? It's wrong to ask for reparation but beg for an apology…as long as your viewpoints lean right.

    <<Black Santa issues executive orders that essentially allowed union thugs to just take toys of the white elves trucks straight to flea markets>>

    What executive order is this? Or are we supposed to be you just because you're conservative and you said it?

    As for unemployment? I thought republican in congress in 2010 said they were running on the jobs platform. Shouldn't we be asking THEN where the jobs are?

    I do have a sense of humor, but this was not funny at all. You could have kept this.

    • theblacksphere

      Yet you read it, and bothered to write a LONG comment! Merry Christmas Knucklehead!

    • ant

      Obviously, you have a sense of humor…you thought Obama would make a good President. Too bad for everyone that farce has turned to tragedy.
      I love how you skip over the inconvenient parts…like joblessness long before a handful of TeaParty reps got into the House, or the $15trillion in debt, or…what's it?…4 years now without a budget….my! what a great way to hide real spending from the People…just don't tell them…truly, a Dem characteristic…corruption out in the open…who cares?.. they won, they got media protection, they got a deck stacked with race cards, etc….heck, a lot of these congresscritters actually have the audacity to spring the "I'm poor working class" card at $170,000 a year plus.
      "Reparations"? You think taking money from some white dude stocking shelves in a shoe store, whose family was in Ireland until 1918, is fair? What did he have to do with slavery?
      Sorry you feel so strongly about this article, I guess Kevin forgot, it's all about you.

      • Middle Thinker

        Black conservatives love to post words and thoughts I did not say. I never said who would make a good president or stated whether or not I favored reparations. The point I brought up was how the author mentioned reparations in his whine (that's right, you guys call it a rant) yet was probably in favor or Rev. Perryman suing the Democratic for what (I am trying to hold my laughter) an apology for slavery.

        <<"Reparations"? You think taking money from some white dude stocking shelves in a shoe store, whose family was in Ireland until 1918, is fair? What did he have to do with slavery>>

        Unsure where this came from. Perhaps too much egg nog for Christmas?

        Regardless of when the Tea Party came in office, there were Bush Tax Cuts before and after they got in. That is the current tax structure. So pick your poison: (A) If you say that President Obama's policies are not working, guess what-he is using conservative principles. Or (B) Supply-side economics do not work to create jobs, yet Republicans keep pushing this ideal. Either way, you lost this part of the debate.

        Budgets: they are approved every year by congress. If you are talking about a balanced neither party has had one in years.

        The debt. Wasn't it Republican Congresses and Administrations that asked, "What is a deficit," and also said "Deficits do not matter." After all Republican Administrations run higher budgets and greater debt ceiling increases. Regardless of the 15 million deficits, though it did simply happen in three years of an Obama Presidency. After all there were unpaid for wars and the tax cuts, and Medicare Part D all parted of the can kicked down the road.

        Corruption? Are you still reading that link of Republican crimes I sent you (LOL).

        Race card? Black conservatives used the whole deck with the Herman Cain campaign (LOL).

        Congressional salaries? How many republicans turned down congressional perks? There was a Tea Party member who did even want to wait the required 30 days and legislated to have benefits start immediately.

        • ant

          Are you actually trying to blame the entire economic malaise on the "Bush tax cuts"? We have a President who has sunk the Nation deeper into debt in 19 months, than the debt accumulated from the time of G. Washington to R. Reagan. Among the many other job-killing accomplishments of this President from a very poorly timed Federally-mandated Healthcare Bill to regulations and impending government mandates hanging over the population's heads in perpetuity, from the EPA, NLRB, etc. Are you serious? Who had the Countries credit rating downgraded for the first time in history? I'll give you a hint, it wasn't Bush or his 'tax cuts'. I find it amazing that in libtard land a decade of a lowered tax rate is considered temporary and will always be called a cut, but ending a recent Obama payroll tax cut is automatically a 'tax hike'. How amazing, how decrepid. Try to have a Merry Christmas, even if Bush tries to ruin it for you.

          • Middle Thinker

            Never blamed the tax cuts 100%, but that is the structure that the GOP said would bring in jobs, but isn't.

            The credit rating listed the reasons for the downgrade was too much talk about cutting the budget but not enough about increasing revenue. That would make it the GOP side, if I recall. This was from S&P, who did the downgrading. Why not look up, Eric Cantor-R, who make a windfall off investing stock that will reap profits if there was a downgrade.

            And you have a good New Year yourself. Stop playing victims cards and blaming liberals so much for what going on in your life.

          • ant

            Wrong. The credit downgrade was a combination of continued SPENDING and no budget cuts. Not to mention a whole lotta finger pointing, apocalyptic fear-mongering, and no action. And please don't use the libtarded word 'revenues' that is lipstick for the pig known as 'taxes'.
            I don't blame liberals for what is going on in my life, I blame them for what is going on in my Country. Let me be perfectly clear on this point, any politician calling for increasing taxes is the enemy, it's that simple. You don't spend billions and billions of dollars irresponsibly, selfishly and without the consent of the people. And then tell the people to 'pony up!'. The gallows were created for such behavior.
            You have a Happy New Year, too.

          • ant

            You know, New Year celebrations may be the only American holiday so far not obfuscated,demeaned, insulted and PC'd into libtarded nonsense and grating annoyances…..yet. Maybe they just have an affinity for all things with an alleged air of drunkeness and debauchery. So it has escaped their cross-hairs, Christmas and Easter are too 'Christian' and the 4th of July is too 'jingoistic'. New Years has just the right amount of meaninglessness….but I'm sure they'll be getting to it.

          • Throw Them All Out

            I'm trying to find the story, but the other day it was mentioned on a radio station I listen to that New Year's is now under attack (I believe) by the muslims as being "insensitive." I say anybody who doesn't like what has been the established mainstream of this counry can get the heck out.

          • ant

            Seriously? Man, they just won't be happy until American's are sucked into a life of dull, gray joylessness. There was a a defector from the Soviet KGB that gave a series of lectures n the '80's about how America's leftist infiltrators have as part of their plan for conquest a 'dishearten America' stage, which included among other things; bad, depressing art,(check) bland depressing food,(on it's way) useless 'education' (see diversity, homosexuality, while reducing actual skills like math and science)….I'm sure attacking holidays and celebrations is in there somewhere.
            I can't remember the Soviet man's name, but some keywords should find it for you on a search, if you're interested.

          • Middle Thinker

            "Revenue" was the word the S&P used. So I guess that makes them liberal too, right?

            Your point about spending money irresponsibly, you were probably quiet during the Republican administrations as they ran record deficits. John McCain said he would continue the same policies that Bush enacted if he were elected. So guess what? We would be in the same situation. And black conservatives, instead of looking in the mirror and at their party, would still be saying it's a liberal's fault.

          • ant

            Actually, I've been ranting about government spending since the first Clinton term. So sorry. try again. BTW, see my post below, you're doing that moral relativism thing again. So, I guess it's okay for Obama and gang to spend us into oblivion, because Bush and Pelosi were already doing it. Do you hear yourself? Thta called cutting off your nose to spite your face, if I'm not mistaken. Or more exactly, letting government cut off your nose, because..well hell… the former administration already had the knives sharpened.

          • Meshuggahboy

            I was very unhappy with Bush also, he was terrible on fiscal matters. But it's still not a fair comparison – Obama has tripled the deficit.

        • theblacksphere

          Middle Think me ass. You're a LEFTIST pure and simple. Whatever is left of the race card after the Dems used it as EBT is NOTHING! LOL

          • Middle Thinker

            I am a moderate who has conservative values, but dislikes black conservatives who act like they know it all and believe their political views are on a higher level than other who don't think like them. All this talk about libturds and other derogatory names is supposed to show this inherent intelligence black conservatives disillusion to think themselves to have?

            I call you guys out for your own hypocrisy. And since it's probably rare for this to happen and to make it understood in your own mind, it makes it easier for you to rationalize and call me a liberal

            As for the race card, who were the whiners during the collapse of the Cain Campaign. There was no talk of how the right sold him out. Not a peep. No talk of that conservative news channel throwing him under the bus after those softball interviews….but then you wouldn't because you trying to peddle your satire to them. Nope you sat there and placed all the blame on the left. No talk about personal responsibility at all. You throw these values around when talking about liberals but it never applies to your own.

            No, dude, black conservatives do a lot of crying and playing race and victims cards. It still took someone not even of the black race to verify and confirm your existence (Glenn Beck). Instead of speaking out against that you guys high-five it and wait for the pat on the back. Why not pull yourselves up from the bootstraps and get the funds and run your own television network. Yet you cry because you are not on the news channels like MSNBC. You cry about not getting support from candidates we don't even know their names until election time if they are from the right. Who's fault is that. Instead of buying billboards, take your messages to the communities…unless you're scared to (LOL). I can't wait for those phone lines to open up. Someone like me will make some of your staffers quit (LOL).

            In your own twisted logic, instead of yourselves, it's liberals in your minds who are to black.

            I give a thumbs up to conservatism. I just don't like the words and actions of some who practice it.

          • Throw Them All Out

            "I am a moderate who has conservative values, but dislikes black conservatives who act like they know it all and believe their political views are on a higher level than other who don't think like them."

            So, you don't like you no uppity black folk, eh? They sho 'nuff oughtta be workin' that white man's plantation and doin' the Yessa Massa shuffle, huh? He should be sayin', "Oh, yessa, tha white man who's gwoin gives me some weffare monies is the man wif da plan, sho 'nuff! An' anybody who say sumfin' diffrent be a knowitall uppitty black man who don' know his place in dis here world an' who's handin' out that coin. Cuz if'n he ain't workin' the NEW white man's plantation and jes' goin' wif da plan and bein' bought wif other men's monies, then he's a bad blackie. Yup, sho' 'nuff."

            Wow, so you can't even appreciate that somebody GETS IT and speaks out about it? Instead, he's a know-it-all?

          • Throw Them All Out

            Part 2 (I guess not much can be posted in each post)

            Let me ask you something. If I came to you and told you (and I'm assuming here, but work with me if I'm wrong) and I said to you, "You're ignorant and incapable of doing for yourself because you're a loser and less than, and for that reason, I deserve to own you," you'd probably be pretty damn mad at me, wouldn't you? And rightly so. It's ugly and wrong and I'm sure doesn't properly define most black men and women, NOR does anybody have a right to own another human being.

          • Throw Them All Out

            But if I "said" it with a check, and that check keeps black people down and barely making it, and it all but guarantees you'll vote for the plantation owner who gave it to you (the dems), then how are they better off today than their kin were 150 years ago? A THAT time, they were taken from their land and forced to do the white man's will. Today, many WILLINGLY sell their souls for a welfare check. Still on the plantation, but this time WILLINGLY shackled to the man. Yet you REFUSE to see it! KEVIN SEES IT, and you berate him for turning the mirror on you!

          • Throw Them All Out

            (sorry it's in so many pieces)

            And you hate people like me who are conservatives who tell you that I have FAITH in my fellow man to do for HIMSELF and to NOT be owned by the man. Yet the fact that you would get angry at me while 98 percent of all blacks vote democrat tells me that I am shouting into the wind here. Instead of making Martin Luther King, Jr., proud, his death was for nothing due to your brothers' and sisters' willingness to stay on that plantation and scream at the rest of us from the net that the man has put around them. I don't expect you to be happy with this post, but I refuse to put it any other way anymore. DEMOCRATS are the SOLE reason minorities have not done better over the last 50 years and have, in fact, done worse as a whole.

          • Middle Thinker

            My whole political philosophy hardly fits into the political spectrum of democrats or republicans, because both have exploited the black community historically. Solutions are only going to come when we work outside the political spectrum.

            Which makes the talk about the plantation somewhat ironic when it comes from black conservatives. How is it you're free on one side of the political spectrum and not the other when it is still the same system? This is what Kevin and other black conservatives fail to see. True independence does not come from moving from democrat to republican or vice versa. And what good is Kevin doing by only speaking out what liberals are doing yet avoiding and refusing to call out the incidents of racism coming from the right. My proof: there were no liberal outlets saying anything negative about Gloria Cain, yet the right has plenty to say about Michelle Obama. Pictures of President Obama depicted as a monkey does not have anything to do with his political policies, yet black conservative say nothing.

            As much as you talk about poverty pimps on the left, what have black conservative economists or authors done for the black community? Have they even applied any of their theories or put them to practice?

            Look at GOP candidates? Do you really feel you have a choice? As much as you talk about Obamacare, in one way or another three out of the four candidates support parts or all of it? Mitt Romney's plan it just like Obamacare, Newt Gingrinch supports an individual mandate, Rick Perry supported it and wrote Hillary Clinton a letter in favor of it. And Republicans legislated for Universal Health Care in 1993. So guess what? Either way you will get some form of it or another if someone out of these three from the right becomes president. All the talk about repealing Obamacare is fluff because it will cost more to repeal it than to keep it.

            The problem with Kevin Jackson and other Black Conservative bloggers and commentators is that they have no humility. And I am on other sites as well saying the same thing. Lloyd Marcus, Star Parker, Franz Kebrau, Alveda King, Armstrong Williams, and others twist and bend the truth as much they say liberals do. None of them are talking solutions, because no one would tune into what they are saying.

          • Meshuggahboy

            Why would anyone have bad things to say about Gloria Cain? She's not the one who's been living like royalty at our expense. I don't give a crap if Michell Obama has green skin and six arms and legs – what I do care about is the fact that she thinks she needs 22 "assistants" that are paid for with our money and spends millions of our dollars flying all over the world acting like some kind of movie star. She needs a good dose of humility, and she's going to get it next November.

          • ant

            Ridiculous. 'What have black economists or authors done for the black community?" Uhm..let's start with told them the truth, stood by their convictions, and are shining examples of how well one can do by escaping the liberal plantation.
            "Have they (black economists and authors) even applied any of their theories or put them into practice?" Yes, that is why they are personally successful. If you're speaking on a National level, you will never know. Because people like Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams are not in a position to legislation. And if they were lucky enough to escape the lynching they would get for attempting to attain some sort of office, they would never be adopted into the CBC, nor would they be listened to or 'tolerated', in fact, black and white liberals would only marginalize and demonize their ideas. And you'd be their right with them.

          • Throw Them All Out

            You are right, MT, many blacks who COULD offer solutions won't offer them because, let's face it, their solutions probably entail a mostly self-reliant approach, something your average Obama voter doesn't want to hear. They want the MONEY, honey, not to be told they can and should be self-sufficient and quit allowing these slave owners to own them further still.

            For pretty much all your reasons, I consider myself a CONSERVATIVE — not a republican.

            But you want to talk about racism?? In all the time I've been a republican, for all its flaws, they welcome ALL. With democrats, you had best toe the line and be an Uncle Tom for the man or else. And then when you vote for them, they do all they can to keep you not only out of the process, but continually subjugated through "perks" like welfare, EBT, AFDC, Medicaid, redistribution, etc. They BUY you the same as if you were up on the auction block. They LOVE you so long as you toe the line. But the second you step off the plantation, they sic the dogs on you in a big, BIG way. Look what they did to Cain.

          • docjohndenver

            Yeah, I'm a "moderate", too. If by moderate, you mean I can claim to be anything I want to when it is socially or politically expedient. I also would like to say that I "give a thumbs up" to liberalism. After all, my poor, mostly minority patients have done so well sucking the forced government teat for the last several decades. I just don't like some of the words and actions of those who practice liberal ideals. Middle, sometimes you just sound like a complete charlatan, railing against those of us who actually believe this president is a bad leader, but never taking responsibility for constantly making his pathetic arguments for him.

          • Middle Thinker

            As much as conservatives talk about telling truth, you guys sure digest a lot of lies. You talked last week of having a "honey do" list, yet you have nothing to refute anything I said in the past.

            But I have been on enough black conservative sites to know the modus operandi: as long as you are bashing liberals and blaming them for everything, you are ok with them. But when you call them out on their hypocrisy and expose them to the truth with non-partisan and conservative sites, then it is not cool with them.

            You can't even go back and find anywhere where I said I supported President Obama in 2008 or will vote for him in 2012. I have never agreed with all of his or any other president's policies. The arguments you call pathetic, you never seem to be prove wrong.

            Your problem with me is that I am not in lockstep with your thoughts about the President. In most of the minds of people on this board, they will not be satisfied with anything he does anyway.

            I love this line right here: <<I just don't like some of the words and actions of those who practice liberal ideals.>>

            I challenge you to list what you feel are "liberal ideals" and I can probably find Republicans who support (or have supported) these same ideals for 95% of them.

            As for being what you call a charlatan, sorry if you have problems being shown the truth. The poor, minority clients you claim you see on a daily basis does not classify what liberals as a whole think. Conversely, though, it reflects the limits of your thoughts because you have nothing to say about corporations who make billions in profits yet receive billions in subsidies. After all haven't they been taking from the government also for decades? At an even higher rate them people on welfare been misusing the system?

          • docjohndenver

            To quote a great movie line, like most libs "you wouldn't know the truth if it kicked you in the head."

          • ant

            LIberal ideas are not easy to list, because they are largely inchoate and dressed up in deceit. Just as noone can really decipher the actual demands of Occupy libtards, 'more government, but less government,?", " illegal immigration as working class, free college for the rest of us?".
            I would venture to say they don't even fall into the category of ideas, because they are either illogical (abortions, yes, punishment for criminals, no, Unemployment is the BEST economic stimulus and will create 600,000 jobs. Nationwide healthcare for all will reduce the deficit.) or stem from pure emotion ("This election is about me!" , "TeaParties are Nazi!!", "Men are pigs!").

          • Throw Them All Out

            MT, corporations can't take what the government doesn't give. Why is it the leftists always blame the corporations for what the GOVERNMENT is doing? I don't disagree with the anger at the policies, but you have GOT to direct your anger at the proper parties. Government and business is working hand-in-hand. Corporations were given citizen status. Corporations are able to lobby for what THEY want better than WE can because they have the money. Who allowed this? The POLITICIANS who BENEFIT from these actions. Get mad alright, but get mad at the right folks.

          • ant

            "I am a moderate who has conservative values, but dislike black conservatives who act like they know it all…"
            Translation; I have no convictions, I stand for nothing, I am double-minded and easily swayed by the winds of the day, I will tolerate anything, I have no foundations, moral or otherwise, I will do as I am told, I guess, I'm not sure, it depends what they tell me. I am what you call wishy-washy and I expect others to do the same. I resent those with solid beliefs and standards.

          • Throw Them All Out

            I dunno, Ant — everything I read says, "I'M A FLAMING DEMOCRAT!"

    • ant

      Since you ask Kevin about the Unions regarding Black Santa. Here are a few greatest hits from the past year. Waivers from Obamacare handed out to Unions, no such toys for the other elves. Support for open-ID voting… you see it's okay for the Unions to know who YOU are if you're voting against them..but ID for voting for the jerks we send to Washington is a big racist crime. How about those gifts of tax-payer money via 'stimulus', forgot about them? How about the heavy-hand of the regime coming down on Boeing's choice of which State to operate in? And defining parents of children with disabilities as 'care-givers' subject to having Union dues collected, of course, but no such other benefit.

      • Middle Thinker

        Cronyism is common amongst both parties. Remember the no-bid contracts Hallyburton received to re-build Iraq during the Bush Administration.

        Unions do not do everything right, some are indeed corrupt, but the website, http://www.opensecrets.org. shows what every congressman is getting from corporations, and I will bet you will even find some republicans getting contributions from them as well

        I have no problem with Voter ID. I have been presenting my ID when I go vote for years, and makes no difference to me.

        As for Boeing, where is your evidence about this besides your words? People of the right cannot seem to make up their mind about what they want: first, it's let free-market reign. But yet, for example, with BP, you wanted President Obama to step in and impose draconian measures on BP, and faulting him for not doing so. So which side of the mouth are you gonna talk out of today?

        • ant

          I did not want Obama to step in and "find out who's ass to kick'. As a matter of fact, not only did Obama reveal his laziness and impotence once again on that issue, but he over-rode the restrictions on BP when it was discovered their equipment was potentially defective, and gave them the green-light through executive fiat. Which is his right as King, I suppose. Amazingly (not really, from him) America's own energy interest suffered more from Obama's 'boot on the neck' then did BP. Thanks for putting words in my mouth though.
          You really must stop with the 'they did it too' nonsense. We all know that. I say throw the bums all out, and begin the trials. You assume we here are blind Republican vote-casters. Not true. And the libtard cry of, "…but Republicans.." is a disgusting kind of moral relativism. This is common among the libtards I know and it must stop. If injustice or corruption is done on behalf of our 'public servants', it shouldn't matter to the populace whether they are an R or a D. If Bush was eating children and Obama followed suit. They both need to be held accountable, not excused because it's been done more than once.

          • Middle Thinker

            Oh, what's the real issue here? You always want to say, "We know that," when the heat is on the right, but when it's on the left, let it rip and allow the insults to flow?

            Moral relativism? So what is it called when the right calls the left on things? Aren't you guys the one who call liberals God-Less and have the Christian Right, Moral Majority, and Focus on Family Groups?

            You want to decry it's on both sides, yet you are not calling out your own. At least I can concede things are not right on the liberal side.

            By the way, I don't call racism at the drop of a dime. I see beyond rhetoric to know that talking about blacks-either on the left or right-sell books, increases ratings, and takes focus off real problems and solutions. Every week there is a racial issue on the left, only to be balanced by something on the right shortly thereafter.

            Look at Kevin's list of subjects to whine about. The only common thing is that they all point to liberals. But I understand the rationale behind this. The black conservative platform is so weak, that this is all they have to talk about. As black conservative you cannot call racism unless is involves liberals. To do otherwise would collapse the house of cards on which your political views are based, and would have a nervous breakdown to know that what is done on the left is the same thing on the right.

          • ant

            I'll tell you what. Next time we have a Republican President and/or Republicans in charge of the purse strings, I'll be right their fighting with you if they; sell guns to drug cartels and street gangs, do nothing about illegal immigration, spend other people's money like Marxist drunken sailors, rule by executive order, expand government interference in every aspect of our lives, apologize to our enemies for America and insult/divide the American people, violate campaign rules, hide their records, issue veiled threats against journalists that are 'unreasonable', enact constant job-killing regulations and/or shut down, take a political pass on things that create jobs (gibson guitar), enact nationwide mandates that force purchases and penalties, hold a record for golf outings during one of the worst times in our Nations recent history and on and on and on. That's just a small sample of what we have going on with this President and you want to sit and whine about the past.

          • Throw Them All Out

            I'll join you, Ant. I don't give the other guy a pass because he's on the toher side or a different color. I don't want to be enslaved no matter WHO is in office. That's the difference between true conservatives and all the others. The others make excuses. WE get fed up and create the TEA Party. ;)

          • Middle Thinker

            Conservatives who say they are conservatives do not practice this when elected and go to Washington. Look at the voting record of the Tea Party candidates and you will see most have voted for the same things they campaigned against.

          • ant

            Funny. Because not too long ago, the MSM were complaining that TeaParty types were obstructing the process, halting spending bills due to pork, etc. Doing pretty much, what they were elected for. You just make this stuff up in your head, don't you?

          • Middle Thinker

            Nope, look how many TP members voted for the debt ceiling increase, patriot act, the latest defense budget, stimulus packages. Enjoy the Tea Party while they last, for in 2012 most of them will be voted out (LOL),

          • Throw Them All Out

            C'mon, "middle thinker," you're no more "middle" than I am, well, the president of the United States. You are not a frothing leftist from the looks of it, but you are far from middle. If you TRULY believe you are a middle thinker, it's news bulletin time. Just sayin'…

          • Middle Thinker

            No more than the only people you want to throw out on Congress are democrats. 95% of your posts lean right. You only talk about Republicans because I point of their malfeasance.

          • Throw Them All Out

            You CAN read, right? My moniker is Throw Them ALL Out. At least mine's not a lie like yours.

          • Middle Thinker

            I exposed your true colors a long time ago. The only "all" you want to toss are democrats

          • ant

            They had their chance. They blew it. Would you keep a horrible, destructive thieving employee on your payroll for more than five years, when you have new job applicants?

          • Middle Thinker

            I really like this last part: << you want to sit and whine about the past.>>

            Is it called whining about the past when:

            Kevin Jackson mentioned lynching and Herman Cain in his rants?

            Rev. Wayne Perryman, who is suing the Democratic Party for past injustices?

            Franz Kebrau and National Black Republicans who post extensive information about the past horrors of slavery and democratic culpability?

            All this to say you probably won't have anything to say about a Republican or an Administration who does these things, because you are not even calling them out now.

          • ant

            Uhm..excuse me..Bush= 3 years ago, Cain= the present campaign.
            The reference to injustice against blacks from the Dem plantation isn't so much about slavery of 200 years ago, but calling on truth above their 'current' platform of continual lies.
            And what Republicans should I be calling out now? You do remember who is currently President, don't you? Should I call out Rep. Ryan for coming up with more budget plans in two months than the Dems have in three years? Should I call out Allen West for not declaring himself dictator and just running with the ball held by the Dems? Should I call out the TeaParty guys for daring to hold a budget meeting without approval from those who call them 'sewer rats'? Your arguments go nowhere, just one big circle. Look at what's going on now, 'Fast and Furious', Solyndra, we have Nancy Pelosi, et al, exacerbating class warfare while spending $10,000 a night for a hotel room, etc., why do you insist on looking for some Republican 'scandal' past or present with all the high crimes of the Dem party staring you in the face? Because for all your 'center' posturing, you are anything but.

          • Middle Thinker

            All of Ryan's plan will increase budget deficits and make tax breaks permanent that do not even work to create jobs. We are witnessing this now.

            Senator West talks a good game but look at his voting record and see what he really votes for.

            Call out the Tea Party for all the loud rhetoric yet they too have voted for stuff you say as a conservative you are against.

            You will not do any of these things, because in finding out the truth you will see that many who carry an "R" behind their name do not even represent you when they get to Washington.

          • ant

            (yawn)…yep, heard this from you before…repeating the same bull will not make it true. From whence comes all the crying of 'obstructionist', Obama can't get anything done, we need more legislation but we're not getting it? A TeaParty uniting with the Dem agenda should make for smooth sailing, wouldn't you think? You're pointless and boring.

          • Throw Them All Out

            MT, the ONLY thing that will create jobs is for the government (read Princess Pookie the Obamanation) to GTF out of the WAY. Government KILLS jobs. Insane regulations KILL jobs. Lopsided tax systems KILL jobs. OBAMACARE KILLED JOBS. Every frigging thing they DO, every frigging thing they TOUCH, every frigging thing they take over goes to s**t — and not in a minor way. In a BIG way. If they would get the hell out of the way and let capitalism WORK they way it SHOULD instead of turning it into corporatism with all their crony ways and "you wash my back and I'll wash yours" (which, in the real world, is called BRIBERY), and redistribution of WORKING MEN'S wealth, then maybe things would go right again.

            The fact is, you keep looking to your government to create jobs. THAT'S NOT THEIR JOB!!! You want the asshats who COST us millions of jobs by their very intentional actions to be responsible for creating that which they killed? SERIOUSLY?

          • Middle Thinker

            So the vacuum noise that represented the jobs leaving America and going overseas over the last ten years is the fault of Democrats, is that what you are saying?

            The only lopsided tax system is the Bush Tax Cuts. Google Mike Pence, R-Ind, for he said the cuts do not increase jobs.

            If Obamacare killed jobs then Romneycare would do the same in Massachusetts, am I correct. And thank conservatives for both plans, for they came from a Conservative think tank. In other words, conservative ideals killed jobs.

            OOPS.

          • Throw Them All Out

            Only in Libtardland is Romney a conservative. I could call myself a kumkwat, but that doesn't make me one any more than Romney calling himself a conservative makes HIM one.

          • ant

            Really? Conservative ideas? Whose ideas are these? Let's loan 500 billion to a Solar company that no other administration would touch, because of previous defaults and a risky business model. Food Stamps offer more bang for the buck. Unemployment is the best economic stimulus. Let's loan Soros' interest, Brazilian oil a few million, while stomping out domestic oil production and let's take a pass on 20,000 jobs created by the XL pipeline deal we would have had with a 'friendly' neighbor. Let's shut down two American guitar factories. Let's 'stimulate' the Unions and the public sector, ie Government. In the words of Harry Reid, 'the private sector is just fine, we need to further help and expand government work".

          • ant

            So the economy sucks and joblessness is increasing….what a perfect time to concentrate on a huge Federal, mandatory, job-killing healthcare bill…a perfect time to issue de-facto amnesty and working papers to millions of illegals alien while Americans are looking for work…so we've borrowed trillions and trillions of dollars and we have future unfunded mandates exceeding $200trillion…another $4million vacation won't hurt..What would you do with an exstra $40 a month?…Let us hold regulations and tax discussions over the heads of all business, to make them fear for the future and halt hiring….let's offer incentives for window weather stripping..that worked wonders/sarc.

          • ant

            As to your last paragraph. Do you expect a self-avowed conservative to write articles condemning conservatism and praising liberalism? That would make him… uh…..duh…a liberal. Are you daft? I must be, because I can't believe I waste my time talking to you. Do I really have to explain why conservatism has a problem with liberalism? really? Or are we just not supposed to express it? That's another charming liberal trait, the suppression and shutting down of differing opinions, otherwise known as the real facts.

          • Middle Thinker

            Really? I have the power to shut down independent thought on a conservative site? You give me way too much credit (LOL).

    • Throw Them All Out

      Middle Thinker, just because you don't like Kevin's analogy doesn't make him wrong. The republicans aimed the bus towards the cliff. Obama has simply shoved down on the gas pedal. ALL parties are at fault, but I hold the democratic one in particular disdain for all the race baiting and warfare they are perpetrating on all of us. Kevin is spot on in his assessment here.

      • Middle Thinker

        Indeed, the Democrats do have some responsibility. I can concede that. But what Kevin does in this and every one of his whines (rants) is place the blame solely on liberals. It's black conservatives like him and people like who fail to see the faults within their own party to do "expose" and "dissertations" on what liberals do. People who focus so much time and energy on disliking something must be hiding something deep down, instead of focusing on their platforms and how to strengthen their message.

        • ant

          Actually, this was about Obama, many of Kevin's rants are indeed about something specific. Obama is the subject of this one, there is only one President at a time. Obama is a libtard, so of course some of that ideoology will be part of the focus. So it's really unfair to say you're unhappy that Kevin wrote a rant about Obama that would lean on Obama's ideology. If Kevin were white you'd probably be crying 'racism' right now. And like Kevin said, you keep coming back. I don't go to the DailyKos or Huffington and complain that they excluded the conservative view. Get a grip.

          • Throw Them All Out

            But ant, this is what liberals do. If they don't like something, they try to shut down free speech, scream epithets meant to shame the other person, or make certain types of speech illegal. THey can't stand differing opinions of ANY type. They talk about being oh so tolerant, but their tolerance only goes in the same direction as their beliefs do. I see it EVERYwhere I go, and it's disgusting and immature. I appreciate that MT doesn't like what's being said, but I dare him to point out even one untruth in what Kevin said. The left runs on emotions, while the right turns to facts. The left keeps believing if they can cry and scream and stamp their feet enough, that everybody will do like their mommies and daddies did and eventually give in to shut them up. I don't play that game. ;)

          • Middle Thinker

            <<But ant, this is what liberals do. If they don't like something, they try to shut down free speech, scream epithets meant to shame the other person, or make certain types of speech illegal.>>

            I have not done any of the above, though you guys have called me various names like knucklehead, libturd, or some other mess.

            I have not used one curse word in any of my replies.

            I have neither legislated or fought for suppression of your thoughts or ideals.

            None of that applies to me, so you continue to generalize based on what…the same past you accuse me of going back to.

          • Throw Them All Out

            How can you be a "libturd" if you're middle of the road? ;)

            And just because YOU haven't legislated or fought for suppression of my thoughts or ideals, many of your buddies on the left have and continue to do so.

            But if none of what others have said applies to you, then there's nothing to be offended about, nor were any names leveled at you since they don't apply. I'm glad we cleared that up.

          • Middle Thinker

            <<But I dare him to point out even one untruth in what Kevin said.>>

            Kevin said in one article on this blog: "Put racism back where it belongs…on the left."

            Question:

            which party has posted various pictures portraying the president as a monkey?

            Or depicted the White House Lawn as a field of watermelons?

            Most recently talked about the size of the First Lady's Buttocks?

            Put his likeness on the food stamp?

            Depicted him as a witch doctor?

            Has a representative from Ohio who liked to pose as a Nazi?

            Sponsored a Confederate night in South Carolina and had blacks as slaves?

            How many members of the KKK and favor segregation are now the Democratic Party?

            Had someone named Paul Weyrich saying he did not want every person to vote?

            Which party most recently wanted to take slavery out of the history books in Texas and Tennessee?

            Which party wanted to roll back integration in North Carolina schools?

            All answer above are Republicans and Tea Party for some. A short list of a long one to say that racism is not all on the right. Republicans have done quite a bit as of late.

          • ant

            As far as the signs you leftists have used to indicat eracism in the Tea Party. Thank Lyndon LaRouches people, thank one idiot out of thousands or thank an infiltrator from the left. By that logic, I can now assume from Occupy that all liberals are rapists, crackheads, and the type that would defecate on police cars or well-off white kids that want a free college degree and an instant job at 80,000 a year. Fair enough.
            Michelle does have a big, fat butt – that's not racist, it's a fact. Another fact is that would be left well enough alone if she weren't so gung-ho to tell everyone else what to eat. Americans abhor hypocrites. She brought it on herself.
            I could go on with every line that I'm at least aware of. Obama is the food stamp President. By your own previous arguments there are many whites on programs, so how is that racist? How is a witch doctor actually racist if it's a commentary on Obamacare? The rest of your post is knee-jerk reactionary deceit, the textbooks for example, may have well been written by Chairman Mao, so there was a movement to check for accuracy.

          • Middle Thinker

            So I guess David Duke addressing the Tea Party personally is a part of a Lyndon Larouche campaign also, right?

            <<The rest of your post is knee-jerk reactionary deceit, the textbooks for example, may have well been written by Chairman Mao, so there was a movement to check for accuracy. >>

            Wrong answer. Accuracy had nothing to do the rationale of Tea Parties in Texas and Tennessee trying to erase slavery out of history books. The reason was because they did not want the Founding Fathers to be portrayed in such a harsh-yet glaringly true light.

          • ant

            Lie. You better find a link for your first claim. It is a fact, however, that racist organizations gloomed onto Occupy. Does that make all Dems racist? NO, you will always have idiots pulled into scenes with a spotlight on them. But the Tea Party would not stand to be addressed by the likes of David Duke. That's a lie, as is your textbooks example, conservatives have no problem with truth, only liberals are angered by it. It is no mystery that slavery was prevalent in the 1700's, the lie comes from the mis-representation of what that meant back then. One example is that the founders believed negroes to be non-human, as in 3/5ths of a person. That is not the reason for that article, but has become a popular lie. Look it up. Look many things up regarding the Founders, I believe you need it.

          • ant

            BTW, the 'conservatives are erasing slavery from the textbooks' is right out of the left's playbook, and if it were true would not have disappeared off the radar as quickly as it did. A healthy dose of cynicism concerning your beloved fellow travelers would do you good. It is the left that has a love affair with censorship, the writings of Mark Twain ring a bell?

          • Middle Thinker

            <<BTW, the 'conservatives are erasing slavery from the textbooks' is right out of the left's playbook, and if it were true would not have disappeared off the radar as quickly as it did. >>

            Really? Well, here is my proof.
            http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/2011/jan/13/
            http://newsone.com/nation/associated-press/naacp-

            Still convinced democrats had something to do with this? Now where are your links to prove some liberal conspiracy?

          • ant

            What liberal conspiracy? Have you ever read "A People's History of the United States"? Commie-puke propaganda is out in the open. That's what makes it all so disparaging that so many Americans fall for it.

          • Middle Thinker

            I had to go back and get this comment of yours:

            << you want to sit and whine about the past.>>

            Reread your own post. Is it not hypocritical to blame me for going back in the past and you are doing it yourself?

            But I do know about the history of the slavery and Democratic culpability. The questions I ask, though, is this: are there any exalted cyclops in the KKK that represent the Democratic Party now? Name Democrats now who are blocking civil rights of black people now?
            Confederate flags? How many Republican governors have legislated to take it down?

            And the part about David Duke? One thing you will know about me is I rarely say anything that cannot be backed up by proof.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ms9Wm1F9mtY

            After viewing this video, you have some serious retraction to do. Of course not all Tea Party members are racist, but research for yourself if any Tea Party factions disassociated themselves with this message from David Duke.

            As for the Occupy Movement: what racist organizations are part of the movement? Show some proof yourself.

          • ant

            Hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! David Duke speaking to a camera alone in a room? And presented by Keith Olbermann? The man who couldn't keep the five viewers required to keep his job ranting and foaming on MSNBC? And on a page where comments are disabled to boot? That's your proof!? That's pathetic! I have now officially wasted my time. Bye!

          • Middle Thinker

            Dude, the truth is what it is. Only you will sit and try to dispute what is right in front of you. Neither Tea Party or David Duke denied the existence of the link you saw.

          • ant

            If this was a video of Duke, in public, cheered by a crowd of TeaPartiers he was invited to speak to, that's one thing. A racist pig filming himself alone in a room, 'addressing' the TeaParty does not evidence approval. Once again….pathetic.

          • ant

            Since you seem to have trouble grasping this simple idea concerning the prevalent racism of the left. Here is an example from today; http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2011/12/27/f

            Read the whole thing. You'll see that, according to leftist mantra, if a candidate does not have a D next to their name, the blacks will not know who to automatically pull the lever for. Is it because, blacks are too stupid to read, that they cannot research the candidates, that they must not be forced to think and weigh decisions? Only a liberal truly knows. Us racist conservatives keep thinking blacks can do for themselves. How EVIL!

          • Middle Thinker

            The ruling seems insults the intelligence of black voters as if we don't know how to research clients or will blindly vote for someone because they are black or if they had a D or R in front of their name. Yet and still that's is not a leftist mantra, just the ruling of a judge. This judge was appointed by President Bush, by the way, in 2001, so it's possible the judge could be a Republican in the first place.

            Poor Ant. Stymied again. (LOL).

          • ant

            No, it is the left's style. Educate yourself. Look up Cloward-Piven and read how they used blacks as their foil to rely on entitlements and burden the system, thereby crashing it. The left hates America, and yet they really don't know what they'll replace it with- sheer poverty and chaos, I suppose. The devil's work.

          • ant

            Read the article again. It is the criminal racist Eric Holder claiming, "the elimination of party affiliation on the ballot will likely reduce the ability of blacks to elect candidates of choice." The judge (who has a history of ruling in favor of no particular party, that's how you know he's not liberal) simply rejected a challenge to Section 5, which states, "the (racist) DOJ must approve changes on election law in regions with a history, however distant,of racial discrimination.." which in libtard speak means 'everywhere'.
            You can deny it, but this is another case of the soft bigotry of low expectations.

          • ant

            I could do exactly as you have done here with a list from the left but it doen't change the fact that we have a President that has hung us with $15Trillion in debt and lowered our credit rating, that is currently charging us millions of dollars for his vacation, now does it?

          • Middle Thinker

            At this stage of his presidency, in the last three decades, President Obama has spent less time on vacation than any other President except Clinton. Of course this fact you will neglect to see. If the First Family went everywhere on public transportation, flew commercial, enrolled their children in public schools, people like you still be dissatisfied.

          • ant

            Another lie. Record golf games. And every vacation is a remote location where, besides the first couple racking up expenses flying separately, Secret Service details, communications, etc. must be established from scratch and at great expense to us. One Obama vacation to Hawaii or Brazil ends up costing us more than numerous Bush excursions to Camp David or his ranch, already set up as 'away' offices. BTW, if Obama goes to Martha's Vineyard and makes a phone call, his enablers promote and classify it as work. Sort of like calling Malia and Sasha, senior executives.
            You remember that 'moral relativism' thing, still ain't gettin' it, are ya?

          • ant

            Correction, they called the Wee Wons "senior staff" so they could charge the taxpayer with the vacation bill, yet again. And need I remind you that for the past 'three decades' as you have said we were not in the grip of a down economy, with record unemployment, rampant corruption, Arab 'Springs', record debt….. It's in the context, baby. One less jet flight to South America or Asia is nullified by the times we live in. Ironically, much of the financial, employment troubles lie at Obama's feet, the feet with the golf spikes on, all he needs now is a fiddle.

          • Middle Thinker

            And where is your proof?

          • ant

            Obama's kids classified as 'senior staff''.
            http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=351813
            Many links to hit from there, and while you're at it read up on Democrat ethics…and from the media…crickets…
            http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/throw_em_a

          • Middle Thinker

            Far right websites, of course.

          • ant

            Typical.' Show me a source…but I won't believe your source'. Hear any denials from the Obama camp? Now, it's a fact that the White House has what is, in essence, a snitch site where you are to report on people or sources speaking negatively about the Won. The White House also has a policy of asking for names and e-mails of conservatives that liberal donors may know, when said liberals donate to the Obama campaign. So they can nah-nah-nah them, basically give 'em the one-finger salute, supposedly. Now these are both facts and can be seen plain as day on the White House/Obama site, so if you hear it from a conservative, is it not true?

          • Middle Thinker

            Well coming from you, anything I post is a lie. It's most funny when I am quoting conservative websites.

            All conservative sites are well known to spin out some whoppers, like Andrew Brietbart, Ann Coulter, Lloyd Marcus, Star Parker, Freedman's Journal, National Black Republican Association, Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin's Hot Air, Glenn Beck. The list goes on.

          • ant

            Yeah, I know….Romneycare. And Newt believes in the Global Warming Hoax…we get it. The one thing you just cannot wrap your head around is how NOT beloved these GOPers are by the People. And the fact that in the end, all that really matters is removing the current Idiot-in-Chief before he does any more damage. DO_YOU_UNDERSTAND_YET? It's only been explained to you 30 times now.

          • Middle Thinker

            Better watch out. Doc Jon, another esteemed conservative, said to put some words in caps is not effective. But perhaps since your views on the right, you probably get a pass of rationalization from him. Or a pat on the head from Ann Coulter: "Our blacks are better than theirs."

            And what would be evident, though, was if McCain had won, we would be in the same situation. After all, he said he would continue all of Bush's policies.

            If the GOP nominee wins-which they won't but we'll speak hypothetically anyway, the situation would get even worse. And then there would be the whining from the right about what they inherited.

          • ant

            You have the nerve to toss out "whining..about what they inherited"?

          • Throw Them All Out

            Ant, he's incapable of understanding anything that goes against his libtarded ideology simply BECAUSE he's a libtard. Muddy pen, my friend. Muddy pen. And still, he's oink-oink-oinking away over here. Maybe a great New Year's resolution is to stop entertaining the pigs. :)

          • Middle Thinker

            I understand conservative ideology well. That is why I shoot so many holes in your views and theories (LOL).

          • Middle Thinker

            And when it's all said and done, you guys are the ones talking about pigs and oink, oink, oink and "aw, it's a waste of time talking to him."

            It's never a waste of time for me though. It further reinforces my point that there are some conservatives who are not as informed as they say they are, and just as blind in supporting their candidates and views as they say liberals do.

          • Middle Thinker

            Show me some figures that do a comparison of all of this.

          • ant

            They are everywhere, even CBS last time I looked, find 'em yourself. This, in reality, causes a conflict in my mind because actually we are all better off when he's on vacation, as much as he charges us for it, he's doing less harm away from his desk.

          • Throw Them All Out

            Yup, MT's a liberal. Can't think for himself and requires everybody else to do everything for him. I'm convinced.

          • Middle Thinker

            So it's OK for others to ask me for proof. I guess in your minds, that smart debate. And yet when I ask for proof I can't think for myself? Really.

            The most replies come from the knowledge I post, and I hold my own debating with three different people without any help.

          • Throw Them All Out

            Throwing out strawmen fallacies is not debate.

          • Middle Thinker

            Name the fallacies. Prove them wrong.

          • ant

            The only proof you were asked for was TeaParties supporting David Duke and vice versa. And the reason I asked for that is because I'm not gonna sit around and argue fiction. The rest of your 'non-partisan' (snicker) claims are easily toppled off the top of our heads here. I'm sure we can all appreciate that we have functioning memories, it's the selective listening that is a problem. If you had any curiousity as to why the Country has seemingly gone down the tubes since the advent of a Dem majority in the Congress, and further since The Wons election you would check these things out for yourself. But instead you choose to blame America's problems on a grassroots collection of working class people that were concerned about government over-reach and over-spending. Makes no sense to me.

          • ant

            "Yet when I ask for proof"….I won't believe it anyway because it came from a conservative. Even though I claim to be a middle-of-the-road moderate with conservative values. But then again, everything I say is partisan and a lie.
            -signed Middle.

          • ant

            You cannot conveniently disregard the fact that this is the President that has spoken numerous times on 'sacrifice', 'getting some skin in the game', etc, ad nauseum. Again…context baby. Talk is cheap. You don't talk to Americans about sucking up the pain and then head out to the links, we're not stuck with Pravda here, we see what goes on.

          • Throw Them All Out

            Which party had a senator who was a Kleagle (recruiter) and then later an Exalted Cyclops in the KKK?

            Which party was more against the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

            Which party's VP said of Obama, "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy"?

            Which party's Senate Majority Leader described Obama as “light skinned” and “with no Negro dialect"?

            Which party was the original creator of the KKK?

            Which party did Woodrow Wilson, who introduced the largest number of bills proposing racial segregation and discrimination in our nation’s history, belong to?

            Which party did FDR and Harry Truman, who both rejected anti-lynching laws and the Civil Rights Commission, belong to?

            Which party distributed propoganda posters denouncing black republicans after the Civil War until the day came that they realized they could continue to "buy" them?

            All answers above are democrats. You have selective knowledge. MT.

          • ant

            Good post, TTAO. Middle, should be Left Thinker, claims to be centrist and non-party affiliated but only seems interested in smearing Republicans. I believe he also forgot Dem Johnson saying the blacks fighting for civil rights were getting 'uppity', and that the KKK, when blacks were given the right to vote, would threaten black families with rape and murder if the man of the house didn't vote for…..who, Middle?…..let's say it together…..Democrats.

          • Middle Thinker

            Yeah, Yeah, yeah.

            You got to cheer others on because you don't have the fortitude to keep up with this debate (LOL).

            And what does it prove when Republicans are in power they do not strike down with votes, legislation, or Executive Orders the same things that are detrimental to black families?

          • ant

            Kevin has explained this numerous times. The Democrats racism is dress-up as 'caring, help, and lowered expectations'. The key is education, I don't expect you to 'get it', but indoctrination into the liberal plantation of "you are life's losers" cannot be changed by legislation but by the removal of entrenched societal 'blinders' , a desire for real change and fortitude of character and a proud heart desiring for truth. But, you still don't get it, do you?

          • ant

            Besides all that. Look what happened when Newt had the audacity to suggest inner-city youth with no job prospects could make money at school. Have you so soon forgotten the rapid pack that is unleashed at those who try to free the slaves. Must you repeat you're same useless argument over and over? I was about to source for your other arguments, but now I must reconsider. You are wasting my time. Your post above is evidence you are not comprehending any of this, or are being deliberately obtuse. I will not waste my time with ignorant fools, it's your funeral and those of your foolish bretheren, and you are obviously in a hurry to get to it. So hop to it.

          • ant

            When you figure out how to legislate fathers staying with the children they've created, or legislate a cultural shift away from seeing the Government as daddy while being able to offer no gainful employment (thanks again dems) to replace it, you go ahead and let the rest of us know. You will, of course, focus on this post, ignore the case of entrenched "victimhood'' and the rewards for irresponsibility/dependence and repeat again exactly the non-solution you have already offered up more than once.

          • Throw Them All Out

            Exactly, Ant. Liberal Thinker here thinks Daddy Gubment can and should do all, including legislate jobs, fairness, hope, change, yada yada yada. Instead of focusing on how the dems have killed industry, jobs, and ingenuity, he focus instead on why aren't the republicans doing more to create more.

            Seriously, this guy's not working with a full deck. It's as useless as wrestling with a pig — you just walk away muddy, and the pig likes it. If he was such a "middle" thinker, he wouldn't sound like such a libtard.

          • Middle Thinker

            A great way to dance around without answering a question. For all this talk about Kevin (amazing how you are so willing to come to his rescue), you still cannot explain how this "democratic racism" keeps free-thinking, educated, enlightened, fresh off the liberal plantation, Republicans from repealing all these things that are so bad for the black community in Congress.

          • Throw Them All Out

            But see, you STILL don't acknowledge that liberalism is the group that INSTILLED the policies which are killing the black communities. Only when we can tackle (and you can admit) the things that CAUSED the problem can we ever begin to address why the OTHER guy doesn't do away with it. Your sole focus is on why the other side doesn't do something instead of denouncing the side that CREATED it. How dumb is that?? I mean, that's like blaming Smith and Wesson for all the gun violence instead of blaming the guys who wield the guns. ANOTHER dem tactic, I might add. ;)

          • Middle Thinker

            If you admit that Richard Nixon was the first president to sign affirmative action and federal funding for Planned Parenthood into law, then I will acknowledge that the first administration to enact the social programs were democrats.

          • ant

            P.S. my middle name is Fortitude. Learn it, LIve it.

          • Throw Them All Out

            "And what does it prove when Republicans are in power they do not strike down with votes, legislation, or Executive Orders the same things that are detrimental to black families?"

            You mean the things that libtards enact that harm black families like reparations via welfare, AFDC, Medicaid, food stamps, redistribution of wealth, etc., etc., etc.? Yeah, like THAT wouldn't cause some heartburn. Your side already calls republicans the ones who don't care. If they took away the things that keep black people plantation slaves, thereby FREEING them, holy hell would break loose.

          • ant

            You know it. Middle would do well to remember how the simple act of criticizing the policies of the President, a right as old as the Country itself, brought on the knives and daggers of "Raaaccciiissstttt!!!".

          • Meshuggahboy

            Just wait and see the hell that breaks loose when Obama loses in November. I'm glad I don't live in the city.

          • Middle Thinker

            And you really think there is a GOP candidate that can win? (LOL).

            What will really be funny is not only seeing the GOP candidate lose, but the Tea Party and GOP congress sent home packing. There will plenty of rants to read, and bellyaching from this site (LOL).

          • ant

            And if that happens we will remember those responsible for the following four years of misery and chaos. And if it doesn't you can all thank us later.

          • Middle Thinker

            You are making your side look worse and worse the more you write. But I understand because you really don't have an answer. And since you don't I have to draw my own conclusions.

            Basically what you are saying is that you elect people from the right do not have the guts to cut programs that are detrimental to society as a whole, am I correct. In other words, you are voting for people who are not fulfilling their promises, am I correct?

            But even within the limits of your thinking, which seems to imply only blacks use these programs, this would cause a crisis in the inner city as well as areas where other races of people lives. Only someone uninformed would call these programs reparations. It a mindset that is really insensitive to the problems.

            Just come out an say it: you don't have solutions to the problems, that you are content to play the victim role like conservatives have no power to make things right (at least in their eyes).

          • ant

            Well, you have some great answers, "NIxon and how come?" Dang,man, those are some real insights. Your questions have been answered numerous times, but you're too thick to get it. In the corner with a dunce hat for you, you've failed the lesson. Preposterous level of ignorance, that's how I'll remember you.

          • Middle Thinker

            There have been no questions answered just deflection and protection on the part of you "intellectuals." I think the posters on here have not had anyone to come into this haven on conservatism and cause a stir and drop some knowledge.

          • ant

            Are you easily distracted by shiny things and squirrels?

          • Middle Thinker

            No, the democratic past is not new to me. It is a manifesto for most black conservative bloggers and writers, and "historians." But the fact that you posted what democrats did and I posted what republicans did shows that both parties had (have) racism, am I correct?

            But my question to you is who do the segregationalist, white supremacists, Neo-Nazis, skinheads identify with now, in 2011?

            Answer: It's not democrats. In fact, many like the candidacy of Ron Paul http://newsone.com/nation/casey-gane-mccalla/top-

          • ant

            http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/a…. Don't forget Hamas and Hezbollah, jew-haters beloved of the left and OWS supporters.

            BTW, that is where you will find video of David Duke speaking to Occupy. Other groups affiliated with the Democrat Party with overt and covert racist agendas;
            The Black Panthers
            La Raza- a favorite of Obama's, former gringo-hating LaRaza card-holders include Hilda Solis and a number of Obama's White House staff.
            Planned Parenthood- begun by Margaret Sanger, a believer in eugenics and eliminating undesirable races.
            Check out Zombietime site too. Great photos of leftists protestors, including a black man that believes whites are 'dead asians' without souls.

          • Middle Thinker

            Planned Parenthood. Plenty of Republican support over the years. The pro-choice Republicans even have a website. Richard Nixon signed the first legislation to fund it through the government. He was a Republican, by the way. Michael Steele, former head of the RNC is pro-choice, so is Presidential Candidate Gary Johnson.

            Another gotcha moment

          • ant

            Whatever you say. Go celebrate. And don't forget to toast the unborn dead for your self-proclaimed partisan cleverness. Richard Nixon, BTW, is besides the point, he was of the same mind that many of the original justices were in and now find regrettable. The fact that in those days the cry from the left was that abortion would be 'safe, legal, and rare'. It has proven to be a lie, but people like Nixon believed it at the time. Just like the original income tax was "only to make the rich pay, we'll never subject the working man to it" and now look. Again, you have no capacity for learning do you? Michael Steele? Yeah, real conservative hero, he is. Do you think if the left threw the abortion issue out for conservatives to decide, it would survive even one day? PP is your 'baby', own it.

          • ant

            Only in your twisted, infantile, illogical little world would Planned Parenthood be attached to Republicans. TTAO is correct, you are a pig that simply enjoys getting muddy. I can only assume your goal is to aggitate and behave like a gnat buzzing around people's heads. Because the alternative is that you are one of the stupidest, immature people I have ever had the pleasure of attempting a real discussion with.

          • Middle Thinker

            Immature? Infantile? A pig who enjoys getting muddy? All of this because I am proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the views you hold so dear, are held on the right as well (LOL). What's the matter, Ant? Is the truth too much for you? (LOL). Well I will drive this point home even further:
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNqpp3Byqlk.

            Paul Ryan saying, "It's OK that Michael Steele is pro-choice. You know the congressmen every conservative talks about.
            http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/david/steele-….

            After all, yours is the party of inclusion, right.
            http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/after-
            http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081
            http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18284

            So if this is all twisted, then Congressional Roll Calls are incorrect? All these newspapers are incorrect? What? Someone is imitating Michael Steele and Paul Ryan? Is any of these republicans listed above suing these media outlets for libel or slander?

            The answer is no.

            You cannot tell me anything about the right being different than the left. I have proven this many times over. The disillusionment is in your head. To say any of these facts listed above involves democrats tricking republicans give the implication that the GOP cannot think for themselves. And if that is the case, neither are the people who support them.

            There is nothing you, TTBO, can say to me to refute anything I have said and posted links as proof.

          • Throw Them All Out

            MT, I'm not sure what your problem is, but I don't CLAIM the party you keep saying is "my" party. You are so steeped in your leftist bullcrap that you can't even comprehend. Which, since you're a leftist, isn't shocking.

          • Middle Thinker

            When you have nothing else to offer to the discussion you do what is typical of those on the right: try to hurl insults.

            In your mind you said I am a liberal, though I have not promoted any liberal policies. I just point out the biases and untruths that have been rife on black conservative boards.

            Now, you say you don't claim the Republican party, yet when you go into the voting booth, does any of the candidates have a "C" by their name for "conservative?" Wake up, for you are searching for something you will not find: a true conservative. And since you are stuck in the abyss of the GOP, you will probably vote for someone with an "R". And since you want to paint me with a liberal label and associate those beliefs with stuff the party did from civil war unto today, you too, on the side of the republicans, carry whatever is associated with that "R". In other words, stop crying and whining about RINO's and not affiliating with that group.

            Wear the label of the Grand Old Party proud (LOL).

          • ant

            Oh yeah, you know what? You've convinced me. I suppose it makes no difference, so like you, I will begin voting libtard, because they really get me and represent.
            I want communism, I want to 'fundamentally transform' the Country I claim to love. I want latino illegals to "punish their enemies", I want to spend, spend, spend. I want to change Washington by actually INCREASING the amount of cronyism, lobbying, special interests, and corruption. I want to help our Islamic enemies anyway I can, while dissing our traditional allies. I want a Pres. that pals around with radicals and terrorists, one that wants the UN to hold sway over us, one that bows and apologizes to everyone, especially illegal foreign invaders and criminals. Yeah, man gimme some of that.

          • Middle Thinker

            And those things are definitely on the right as well as the left (LOL)

          • Throw Them All Out

            Soooo… using YOUR analogy and disdain for the GOP, you must be voting democrat when you go to the voting booth. Oh, wait, but YOU'RE not a liberal. Uh-huh… o_O

          • ant

            Middle has to vote for Obama. The Won told us himself, if he loses the election it will "herald in a painful era of self-reliance.." Oh, the horror, whatever will I do without Big Brother? hmm…find more work for starters, I suppose.

          • Middle Thinker

            Unsure who I will cast my vote for. The right sure does not give me a reason to vote for them (LOL).

          • ant

            Don't waste your time. Middle's arguments are one big, pointless circle of stubborn ignorance. Save your mind for someone worthy of it. And Happy New Year.

          • Middle Thinker

            The problem comes, as I have stated many times, how black conservative or otherwise think they convince someone to think like them because of their "enlightened" political views. I can say with confidence you probably have not debated someone who can challenge and prove what he is saying and has liberal and conservative views. That is because in the limits of your thinking a conservative cannot be bested in any debate. I challenge anyone on the right to show and prove, more often than not, they can out debate me. That's is why you respond like you do.

          • Middle Thinker

            That's called freedom of speech. I have to power to go to any site and agree or disagree.

        • Throw Them All Out

          MT, there's a lot about liberals, especially progressives, to dislike. I'm so glad you can "concede" that democrats have "some" responsibility here. :o/

          It's easy to go after them because they make it so easy. However, if anybody out there thinks that the republicans are the guys in the white hats out there, they're badly mistaken. I no longer consider myself a republican — more of a Reagan conservative. I am a conservative through and through, but conservatism and republicans aren't mutually exclusive. Just because Kevin focuses on the liberals doesn't mean he thinks conservatives are great. It's just that THEY are the ones who have been in control for the last two years of Bush's term and into the first two years of Obama's — and they've spent us beyond repair. I truly believe the government we have today is hell bent on destroying America in order to create THEIR version of utopia. And by this government, I mean all of them. However, I also believe the progressives are more adept at it as they've been trying to make us communists for decades now.

          • Middle Thinker

            << progressives are more adept at it as they've been trying to make us communists for decades now.>>

            Besides anything decided by the Supreme Court, Republicans and their administrations have had the opportunities to overturn anything they felt liberals have done was wrong, so what the excuses when they haven't?

          • ant

            You mean like Obamacare? Roe v Wade? You mean like immigration law enforcement? EPA regulations? Black Panther voter-intimidation? It's a little hard to overturn petty tyranny and derelict rules with rogue judges, corrupt departments, regulations and laws that avoid Constitutional correction and scrutiny, and a Party that thinks it's above the law and the People.
            You belong to a Party that locks doors and steals microphones from the Capitol when they are challenged. A Party that screams racism at the drop of a dime and gets their cronies in the press to help them. A Party that calls in fake bomb threats to keep the opposition from meeting. A Party that tries to define protest signs as 'deadly weapons', and you think they are unopposed out of some sort of compliance? Wrong, they seem unopposed to you because they are rotten, unethical, 'dirty' fighters.

          • Middle Thinker

            Where's your proof and links to this….oh, that's right you have none.

            I already educated you on where obamacare came from: The Heritage Foundation.

            President Obama lifted some EPA regulations signing into law conservative regulation.

            Nothing you listed is inherent to liberals that conservatives have not done themselves.

            Nice try, no cigar.

          • ant

            Yes, Obama and Pelosi are getting their ideas from the Heritage Foundation. Us conservatives love us some Federal mandates concerning health care for all, and yet, at the same time, we are heartless ogres that want minorities and children and old people to die. Fantastic.
            It's true Obama did back-up on one EPA Reg that I'm aware of. Good for him. So I can kill a puppy if I help an old lady cross the street. Especially if I help her only because people are watching. He's awesome.

          • ant

            You're full of it. You have the audacity to claim that Republican stances on issues like abortion, immigration and others are no different than liberals stances. Nonsense. And don't come back with "Governor so-and-so" supports the DREAM act crap. We're not talking about RINO's or individual sell-outs here, we're speaking platforms. Must I explain to you again…do you think people like McCain or Romney are beloved of conservatives? To use examples like that is a cop-out and only proves you have nothing to offer. Stupidity is inherent to liberals, as are circular, ridiculous arguments. Do you have a point to make here at all? Other than tell us there are Republican cavers and 'compromisers'? You want to come back and let us all know water is wet too?

          • Throw Them All Out

            Don't forget the Flee Baggers in Wisconsin when Scott Walker was holding a vote — then when the republicans voted without the whiny, sissy boys, they cried foul. Nothing but cheaters and babies, the whole lot of 'em.

          • ant

            You really must order your new memo from the DNC. The popular meme now is that Republicans are 'obstructionists' for fighting Obama's Cloward-Piven style. So they're either obstructionists or are complicit, they can't be both. You also suffer from the liberal disease that Americans want constant, perpetual legislation and government activity. It may surprise you to note that conservatives in fact are in a daily battle against 'progressive' ideology, for 'progressives' never stop foisting their 'wants' as policy.

  • Middle Thinker

    I usually come to this board for a good laugh. Wasted time on this.

    • theblacksphere

      Yeah, and you KEEP COMING! LOL

  • Basil Manos

    Amazing….someone wrote a play based on the assassination of George Bush and nary a word was said. Right on Kevin! Eye spy stick em in the eye, someone stole THEIR apple pie. Keep agitating because the progressives will NEVER stop Palining people in humor or not. If they can't take irony and wit, send them to Cuba where they wont even find milk.It's your world Kevin. Have a blast!

    • theblacksphere

      That's the plan Basil. I will piss them off, before I send them packing…down their rat holes of course, with a D-con chaser!

  • p.j.

    God is our all and all…AND since there is no Santa…of any color….this is not the day to bring this all into the mix….ALL are the same to our heavenly Father…..Peace and Love to all of you that are offeneded or feel excluded this day….God loves you and so do I…AMEN!!! P.J.

  • Meah

    Good job Kevin,have a Merry Christmas!!

    • theblacksphere

      You too, Meah! Thanks for the FB props on this bad boy!

  • rwbne

    Great rant, love it! Merry Christmas!

  • Carol Johnson

    Love this article. Of course the first Santa was brown, not white or black. He was a Turkish Bishop. I love seeing articles like this that remind there are still some black people who don't follow the voting herd. White people can vote their conscience. Black people have to vote their color. So it's an absolute? All blacks have to vote democrat? Thankfully not, but I know the pressure is on. That's too much power for any political party to have–sway one black voter and win all black votes? No other group votes like this. Why? Because it hands over an obscene amount of power to a single entity. I've known for years that democrats were going into republican and/or conservative forums making racist posts, posing as republicans. You can keep blacks, hispanics, and other non-white groups out of the republican party by perpetuating the stereotype of conservatives as racists. Which party ended slavery? The Republican party. When it came down to it, which party finally responded to moral conscience? Right. Don't believe the lies. And democrats lean heavily upon social programs. They're supposed to be for times of crisis–not to get on and stay on for years. Do any of those people ever come up? No. So why encourage people to get on these programs and stay on them? For the exact same reason a pet owner chains their dog in the yard. We can't seem to tell the difference between someone offering a hand up and someone offering a handout. What's the difference? One empowers you and the other keeps you down and chained in the yard.

    • theblacksphere

      Thanks for the well thought out message, Carol. This team is changing things ALL the time, and God is on our side!

  • Santa Clause

    I TOLD all of you he was the anti-Christ-mas!

  • Banneker77

    I think this is rather funny. You using terms like CPT. i bet most whites wouldnt even know about that one. BTW the real Nickolas was one of the few bishops who had a complete copy of the Bible in 396 A.D. The printing press wouldnt be invented for 1200 years.. In the nicean councel around that time there were heretics he debated for the truth about Christ: so he actually saved Christmas. ST Nicks day is Dec 6th. We just combined them

  • Throw Them All Out

    Shuck 'n jive, shuck 'n jive. MT is such a good li'l Sambo for the libtards. Goooood li'l Sambo. Believes that ball and chain around his leg is really a cool piece of bling because the man say so. If'n the man SAY so, the man who gives me stuff from the evil conservatives, then HE must be the GOOD man. But I won't claim the democrat party, NO I WON'T! I want to seem cool and independent from the man. But in reality, I go to the voting booth for him and do his bidding when it comes time to vote. Oh, yes I sho' do! MT, you couldn't scream LIBTARD more clearly if you chose that as your moniker instead. I don't care what you CALL yourself, the proof is in the pudding. You liberals seem to think if you tell a lie long enough, people just believe it.

    • blknred

      Good point, but when it comes to blacks the liberal lies have become truth. How else can you explain how 90% vote consistantly democratic despite obvious contradictions to personal beliefs. Or how else could a group of people blindly accept inaccurate history when the truth is readily available. For example, if the media started saying after WW II the nazis realized it was wrong to try to exterminate an entire ethnic group and decide to be the head proponent for Israel's statehood. At the same time the allied forces decide even though they were the reason the Jews weren't exterminated, they don't really like them as a people. So they fought tooth and nail to prevent Israel from becoming a state. Now how many jews do you think would buy that? Yet we have many blacks (about 90%) who believe democrats fought for slavery in the civil war , but were all for civil rights in the 60's. And republicans apparently wanted blacks to be free, but not equal. Now how does that sound to you?

      • Middle Thinker

        Looking back on Democratic History, you will indeed show that they were for slavery, segregation, the KKK, and other sordid things. You can go back through and read quotes and racist things that were said from the left, back in the day.

        But the question is, in the year 2012, where the segregationists in the Democratic Party now? Where are the Bull Connors and George Wallace's now for the left? What Democrats in Congress now are in the KKK?

        The sad reality black conservatives cannot seem to fathom or even accept is that you have plenty of racists on the right. You guys won't even acknowledge the stuff like Pat Buchanan has said, which at one point, he said he wanted to sue David Duke for "taking stuff out of his playbook." Are the Neo-Nazis, KKK, and Aryan groups backing the democrats and President Obama? Do pictures of watermelons, and photo of monkeys coming from the democratic party?No they are not. How many Republican governors are willing to take down the confederate flag? Worse yet, how do you expect blacks to flock to the Republican party when you have stuff like this? http://newsone.com/nation/newsonestaff4/sc-republ… This is not coming from the left, no this the right doing this.

        Yet you try to bring up an analogy about Jews? The reality is, black people should not aling themselves with any party because both have racism. I can admit the left has it race baiters and a sordid past. How of you so called free thinking conservatives have the guts to admit that your party is just as polluted in the last 30 years with race baiters and people within your party who are just as bad as democrats in the past.

        There is no sambo in me because I know when it is all said an done, change is going to come from the grassroots not political parties. You won't find an endorsement of any party, but I call you guys out for your own hypocrisy and misinformation.

        Quite of bit of my proof comes from conservative sites. My hats goes off to those who can keep it real and tell those who claim to be conservative that everything on your side of the plantation is not all and well. because the greatest illusion is that you guys think you are free because you think republican, but it's the same system. In the big picture, you guys are laughed at on he right just as much as people laugh at black liberals.

        As for who blacks votes for in the booth. Black conservatives don't give other blacks a reason to switch their votes. The attitudes conveyed here are just like other black conservative bloggers. Stuck on their own fiefdoms, frustrated, somewhat bitter, and worse yet uninformed.

        I don't think none of you do.

        If republicans were so in favor of black people, why do black candidates complain they are not getting support from the mainstream GOP?

        Where is your outrage over the fact that Republicans and Tea Party members were calling for Herman Cain to step down. You guys said nothing about this.

        No, it seems many black conservatives who claim they are so free, were seemingly happy to get some kind of verification from Ann Coulter with her "Our blacks are better than theirs." If a liberal said the same things, these boards would light up.

        • blknred

          Middle Thinker = pointless conversation.

        • ant

          My God, man! You just don't pay attention to anything anyone says here, do you? First of all, let the Ann Coulter thing go, it was already explained to you what she meant by that, but you rather hold onto your misconception because you're happier being angry.

          Second of all. Pat Buchanan? Let me explain this to you. Pat Buchanan can say he 'hates himself some negroes' all day because no substantial numbers of conservative voters are going to be putting him in office, regardless. But now Harry Reid has said some racist things and Bill Clinton has said, 'in the old days Obama would be fetchin' us coffee'. But Harry Reid gets re-elected by dems and Bill Clinton is supposedly loved by the libtard base, so what's that tell ya?

          Thirdly, you knock yourself out and vote third party then, but most of us know we don't have that luxury for the simple idea that Obama must be removed for the good of the Country and quite probably, the world.

          • Middle Thinker

            Pat Buchanan is not a politician, but still identifies with conservatives and the GOP. It's only the mindset here that bringing in another GOP president after the years of 2000-2008 is going to make things better, when it fact it will be worse. Look at history and see Republicans have higher deficits and wasteful spending.

        • blknred

          right is as racist as left = 50/50 split. Blacks vote 90/10 democratic. middle thinker = not good at math, very good at run on sentences

          • Middle Thinker

            And what is to be said about 90% or more of all black conservatives who were campaigning for Herman Cain? Why? Because he is black.

            Your own math does not make any sense. What does a 50/50 split have to do with how blacks vote? Or is that conservative logic which make everything right as long as conservative quotes it.

          • ant

            Why? Because he is a businessman, a true outsider. Not another lawyer or a red-diaper/trust fund baby groomed to be king like a Kerry or Obama, or the son/daughter of a long line of career politicians a la Pelosi, Landrieu..and even Bush.

            I come here to read Kevins articles and a chance to lay out my own opinion. By your own admission, you come here to buzz black conservatives. Who's the one thinking in racial terms? The fact that this blog is run by a black man is reason numero uno that you bless us with your dissertations.

          • Middle Thinker

            All Kevin talks about, like other black conservative bloggers, is race and liberals. But we all know what that is, it helps sells books.

            As for Herman Cain, working for the Federal Reserve does not make one an outsider.

            As for who black conservatives were pulling for, simply go back through their blogs and see for yourself. Besides a few who supported Ron Paul, the majority were for Cain. Forget all the fluff about being a businessman. Black conservatives were not even behind him under he won straw polls in the South.

          • blknred

            No proof for Cain comment, therefore irrelevent. If both sdes are equally racist then statistically black votes should come out somewhere close to 50/50. Simple math for most, but understandably not for you.

          • Middle Thinker

            Proof? No one believes what I post anyway, right, so what would proof do (LOL).

          • blknred

            You always want proof so I'm just returning the favor. Besides, I would hate to see such an elaborate blogger be a liar as well as irrelevent. (LOL)

          • Middle Thinker

            I'm so "irrelevant" that the longest threads are associated with words I said.

            As for who asks for proof, I only started doing it after your fellow conservatives asked for it. And it was amazing, even though quite a bit of my proof came from conservative sites, everyone still thought I was crazy (LOL).

            But through it all it shows that some black conservatives sit in seat of false piousness. Instead of calling the race card, they scream "liberal" at every turn, play the blame game as much as you say liberals do.

            And most of all, get into an uproar when someone comes and challenges their views.

          • blknred

            Ironically, yes that's exactly why you're irrelevent. Someone has to devote three paragraphs of information to disprove all of your half truths and dancing. If you could stay on topic for more than two sentences and tell the truth, I assure you that exposing you would require many fewer words. That is why (with the exception of this post) I no longer write long posts in response to you. BTW, I never thought you were crazy, just irrelevent. LOL

          • Throw Them All Out

            "I'm so "irrelevant" that the longest threads are associated with words I said. "

            Crap DOES create the most stink, that is true.

          • blknred

            Even if you have Cain proof, you say black conservatives not black voters. That equates to 9% of black voters. Straw argument, therefore irrelevent.

          • ant

            I'm going to tell you why you are wasting your time and others, if your goal is, as you state, to educate. Like a great many conservatives, Thomas Sowell for example, I was a liberal in my youth…bought into the whole thing..many young people do,,they like the idea of social justice, they are easily influenced to 'fight the power', but they lack the experience. I grew up. I saw through time that the left had not much truth on their side. That many times they were angry, hate-filled, illogical, and devoid of true analytical thought or knowledge, mostly knee-jerk emotional stuff with no consideration for consequences or responsibility.

            Their ideas were the same and their methods were often deceitful, 'a means to an end', and came from a place of rage/emotion. I left the left. And now you think you have the capacity to turn people to an ideology they have already known and abandoned. A fool's errand.

          • Middle Thinker

            Your story is the typical story of those who "Left the plantation" and found the "oasis of conservatism."

            It must be somewhat disappointing to find that the same things you accused the left of is almost the same as the right. For there is something inherently wrong with people who try to prove so hard that they are not liberals and the views are different. I think they call that overcompensating. If you are secure in what you believe, you would spend more time defending your virtues of what you feel. Instead, you talk about what the other side does. You run out of "logic" so you try to be crass in what you write.

            So this is never a waste of time for me, because I informed you of some things you did not even know about, and further prove quite a bit of time black conservatives are not as informed as they thing they are. And for someone who said they were through talking to me, you sure do still have a lot to say (LOL).

          • ant

            You would already know what I believe if your weren't so pig-ignorant. What was that you say about talking about the other side? What have you been doing here? Pot meet concrete-skulled kettle.

            You'll have to remind of some of the things you educated me on. That there are RINO's? That despite the Democrat incured debt of over $15 trillion, it's TeaParties fault? Don't make me laugh.

        • Throw Them All Out

          "As for who blacks votes for in the booth. Black conservatives don't give other blacks a reason to switch their votes."

          As in welfare checks?

          "If republicans were so in favor of black people, why do black candidates complain they are not getting support from the mainstream GOP?"

          Same question — as in welfare checks?

          As for Herman Cain, it had NOTHING to do with his color and EVERYTHING to do with the fact that, like it or not, the GOP still looks badly on men who behave badly. Actually, Herman Cain could have been a wonderful way to get back at Obama. He certainly couldn't play his tired old race card if he was up against another black. But Herman had what appeared to be some shady female issues going on there.

    • Middle Thinker

      Calling you out for your own inconsistencies, misinformation, and myths, is not the same as being a liberal.

      • Throw Them All Out

        True. But you ARE a liberal regardless of what you think you're doing here.

  • Middle Thinker

    Correction: they cannot out think me.