This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

By Robby Soave

THE DAILY CALLER

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill will conduct unannounced inspections of classes to confirm that they exist, following revelations about decades of fraudulent classes involving student athletes and the African-American studies department.

With an outside review board scheduled to visit the campus in the spring, UNC administrators are determined to make sure all scheduled classes are meeting at their appointed times, and featuring real conversations between instructors and students. Administrators have even considered taking pictures while classes are in session to obtain proof of existence.

In the College of Arts and Sciences, administrators visited a random 187 out of 2,300 class meetings. If a classroom had windows, the inspector only needed to peek in and make sure that an appropriate number of students were engaged with an in-the-flesh instructor.

One administrator, a former journalist, found the inspections refreshing.

“I’m an old reporter,” said Susan King, dean of the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, in a statement. “So you go and check and document. That’s what reporters do. I thought it was not a bad process.”

But not everyone is enjoying the inspections. One professor called them “Orwellian.”

“It was more than irritating,” said Lew Margolis, a professor of public health, in a statement to The News and Observer. “As I spoke to some colleagues about it, they looked at me and said, ‘This is ridiculous. What the heck’s going on here?’”

Orwellian or not, many members of the UNC community believe they are necessary. Recent investigations have uncovered years of fraud in the African-American studies department, including phantom classes that never met, and others where every student received an “A.” About half the students enrolled in such classes were student athletes, a report found.

Tags

 
 
Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Guest

    So it’s Orwellian to confirm whether University Professor’s is doing the job they were hired to do?

  • http://www.facebook.com/phillip.cleary.14 Phillip Cleary

    So it’s Orwellian to confirm whether University Professor’s are doing the job they were hired to do?

  • http://www.facebook.com/jean.larson.5 Jean Larson

    Welcome to the real world, professors, where your boss checks up on you occasionally to make sure you’re doing your job.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jean.larson.5 Jean Larson

    Irritating? To have someone look in on your class to make sure it’s legitimate? That seems very unobtrusive, and a reasonable response to suspicions or allegations of fraud.

  • http://twitter.com/Pebbles78623 Laura Chamberlain

    Imagine that! Having to be subjected to someone checking your work. Hey! why not just assume that all your students showed up at class and wrote that paper and did their research and passed that test!

    Oh wait, apparently that’s be exactly what has been happening.

  • cbkitys

    If all professors did their job the way they are supposed to then these inspections would not have to take place. Don’t blame the university but the professors that aren’t doing their job! Think of all the money wasted and how does giving everyone an A without teaching anything help those students? Shamefull!!!!!!

  • Carol Hall

    OMG – they have all been forewarned. If they can’t assemble enough students to fake it after being given notice, they are too stupid for college.

  • pamdix

    They shouldn’t have been warned at all. How stupid.

  • WhyMeLord

    I’ve long held that you get what you inspect not what you expect.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwWW2DQS_DU Booker (D-Marxist Meadows)

    Sounds like a good idea. It’s a private school, no?