This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.

black killingsThe KKK, responsible for heinous black killings, was a creation of Democrats. They would do anything to change that fact.

They say that the Republican Party is made up of the racist Southern Democrats, known as Dixiecrats who hated black people, and who were responsible for the 3,446 deaths by the Klan in 86 years.


I have a question for the Democrat Party who would like to forget their racist, heinous past: do you really call this “Progressive”?

I want no part of THAT progress.


Kevin Jackson's hilarious take on Race-Pimping: The Multi-Trillion Dollar Business of Liberalism!

Enjoy this excerpt from the book:

"In actuality, black people will go to substandard hospitals, wait in long lines behind illegal immigrants, and be treated like non-citizens, as there simply won’t be enough healthcare to go around. There will be the occasional lucky few who will receive treatment, and we will parade them around like championship rings, thus continuing the ruse. As you can see, we’ve left out nothing. We touch more on this in Chapter 10: Promise Everything, Deliver Nothing. If for some reason we happen to run out of blacks, we will be able to apply our trade to the Mexicans with little disruptions. Plans are already underway for our next edition in this “How To” series: How to be a Latino "Race Pimp for Fun and Profit…even if you’re Illegal."

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

  • Truth_in_Response

    Based upon the 2011 FBI Uniform Criminal Report 91% of blacks were murdered by other blacks and only 7 % were murdered by whites. Conversely in 2011 82% of whites were murdered by other whites and 14% were murdered by blacks.

    • Jim Plantz

      But: What are the total numbers of murders for each ethnicity?

      • AG Dot Com!

        What is your point?

        • justdooit

          Probably that too much emphasis is given to Blacks…WHY? Because the very scum that put them down want us to believe it was Republicans fault…History shows otherwise…

          LBJ acted as tho he cared…Great Society…a total FARCE…That was just a ploy to keep blacks down on the farm so-to-speak…He also was heard by colleagues to say, “I’ll have them NI**ERS voting democrat for the next 200 years…”

          • AG Dot Com!

            You are right on both points. I cannot produce a source for that LBJ quote off the top of my head but it is pretty well known.

            Not sure how the number of killings matters, when it is so obviously clear that Blacks kill each other and Whites in far greater numbers than the converse scenario.

            Imagine if White teenagers went out and brutally slaughtered a Black guy in the street just for being Black. What would the repercussions be?

          • justdooit

            Let’s just say O would mandate they be hanged publicly…It’ll all get worse…never better til Christ returns and cleanses the Earth and restores His Garden…

          • cimiron

            guess that was one true statement

          • delahaya

            Isn’t it interesting how modern Democrats preaching welfare to minorities sound a lot like Old South slavery apologists? “Well, true they aren’t free, but they aren’t treated too bad and they get food and clothes and have a roof over their heads.”

      • Chip Dooley

        What’s the difference blacks are killing blacks and white are killing white people. 1 killing is to many for any race

  • AG Dot Com!

    The socialists neé democrats have very carefully executed the Devil’s Greatest Trick. They have always been, and continue to be, the party of racism, eugenics, intolerance, and hate. Conservatives, for the most part (no group is ever devoid of its morons) prefer to label Americans as Americans. It is the looney left that requires labels like African/Hispanic/Arab/Gay/Womyn American – ever wonder why?



    • Scot Harvath

      They are the party of the Devil. They could as well be called the Devilcrats.

      • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


  • jb80538

    WHen was the last time an arrest was made in a Chicago murder?

    • AG Dot Com!

      Hey man, I live just north of, and work in downtown Detroit. Our cops are just as inept at solving murders as Chi-town po-leece…

  • bbf

    None of the numbers of killings by the KKK or by Blacks today compare with the 15 MILLION black babies aborted since Roe v Wade. The urban streets are dangerous for blacks..but the most dangerous place for a black baby is in the womb. Thank you Margaret Sanger. Thank you Planned Parenthood.

    • AG Dot Com!

      You could not possibly be more correct. Hey Black America – ol’ Lefty has been running a eugenics campaign on you… You might want to address that and say, help us vote their skinny white granola-crunching, mocha-latte-sipping, Black baby-killing asses out of office!

    • Thomas in Jacksonville


    • Lorene Cribbins Kesler

      I absolutely knew that. She was a firm believer in Eugenics (as was George Bernard Shaw, who designed the gas chamber that Hitler made so infamous; Hitler LOVED the ideas coming out of the Eugenics movement).

      Three reasons to hate abortion: 1) it’s murder; 2) it’s DETRIMENTAL to a woman’s health (depression, suicide, infertility, miscarriage, premature birth, low birth weight babies, and cancer); and RACISM. It is no coincidence that 78% of Planned Parenthood clinics are located in URBAN MINORITY COMMUNITIES. Margaret Sanger said in a speech to the ladies of the KKK, “Abortion is the answer to that Negro problem!”. And that’s what Planned Parenthood does, just taking care of that problem…

  • Chip Dooley

    It was not only whites who killed blacks it’s always been blacks killing blacks and the KKK was not about race. It was about getting democrats elected and did not matter what color you where. Don’t forget over 3400 blacks owned slaves and over 4000 whites owned slaves. Why doesn’t anyone ever talk about blacks owning blacks here in America. If they really where offended by slaves owners why aren’t they doing anything about blacks, Muslims, whites and other races being slave to this day around the world? Peace

    • AG Dot Com!

      Blacks still own slaves in massive numbers. Take a little trip to non-tourist Africa & the middle east – see for yourself. Slave markets are alive and well. Nobody wants to talk about that though, because it doesn’t involve America “doing evil things”.

  • menjo


    Some times comments are much more informative than the articles written.
    If the following is true, you must get it to every republican
    congressman, senator, pastor, every e-mail contact you have!

    sit back, I’m going to provide you with more than an opinion; I’m going
    to provide you with stats/facts that very few of your readers have ever
    heard/read. I’ve provided these stats/facts to the Detroit News
    before, but apparently they’re not interested in educating their
    readers. Maybe you are? I’ll see. There’s enough here to do a series
    of articles. It’s time to wake up America and Detroit.

    95% of blacks vote democrat. But how are democrats when it comes to
    the subject of race/civil rights?Every segregationist who ever served in
    the Senate was a democrat.The Republican Party was founded for the
    express purpose of opposing slavery.It was Republicans who passed the
    Thirteenth Amendment, granting slaves citizenship; and Fifteenth
    Amendment, giving them the right to vote.It was Republicans who sent
    federal troops to the Democratic south to enforce the hard-won rights of
    the freed slaves. The Ku Klux Klan was originally formed as a
    terrorist group to attack Republicans who had come to the Democratic
    South after the Civil War to help enforce legal equality for free
    slaves.It was Republicans who passed the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
    Republicans kept introducing federal civil rights bills and Democrats
    kept blocking them over and over and over throughout history.
    Republicans passed bills to protect black voters in the South in 1890,
    antilynching bills in 1922, 1935, and 1938; and anti-poll tax bills in
    1942, 1944, and 1946. Meanwhile, when Democrats won elections, they
    promptly re-segregated the entire South. In 1913, Democrat Wilson
    instituted segregation in Washington DC, and summarily dismissed black
    officials from their federal jobs. President Wilson’s racist policies
    were fully supported by Democrats in Congress, and angrily denounced by
    Republicans.It was republicans who overwhelmingly introduced, promoted,
    and passed every civil rights act from the end of the Civil War right up
    to and including the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which incidentally, Al
    Gore’s father voted against.The Senate vote on the 1960 Civil Rights Act
    was 71-18. Every single vote against it came from a Democrat. Lyndon
    Johnson voted against every civil rights bill during his tenure in the
    Senate.Democrats only came around on civil rights when blacks were
    voting in high enough numbers to make a difference at the ballot box –
    and then they claimed credit for everything their party had ferociously
    blocked since the Civil War. It baffles me that we’re taught that
    Democrats are the civil rights champions. They are absolutely the
    opposite.First of all, the Republican party was created to be the party
    against slavery because the Democrats were pro-slavery, and good people
    knew it was un-Christian and morally wrong. Lincoln was a Repblican,
    and not in “name only” as so-called scholars are teaching on campuses
    across the country. You’d never know it by how Republicans are
    portrayed now, but we were THE anti-slavery party, and we still are.
    very first Republican president freed the slaves and was hated for it.
    He was consequentially murdered by a Democrat.The Republicans also gave
    the freed slaves 40 acres of land and a mule to work their land..Yep,
    you guessed it, the Mighty Democratics came along and took back the land
    and the mules, and returned all of it to the ex-slave
    owners….From Maggie’s Notebook, an email to her from David Lemon, and
    :Astonishing History of Democrat Racism at The
    Klu Klux Klan was created by the Democrats for the express reason of
    terrorizing blacks and Republicans in the South to prevent them from
    voting, and that every known Klansman that were members of Congress have
    been Democrats….imagine if you will, what a far different nation the
    United States would be had not the Republicans been around to block the
    Democrats’ efforts.
    From WorldNetDaily:Further, the first grand
    wizard of the KKK was honored at the 1868 Democratic National
    Convention, no Democrats voted for the 14th Amendment to grant
    citizenship to former slaves and, to this day, the party website ignores
    those decades of racism….Three years after Appomattox, the 14th
    Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, granting blacks citizenship in the
    United States, came before the Congress: 94 percent of Republicans
    endorsed.”The records of Congress reveal that not one Democrat — either
    in the House nor the Senate — voted for the 14th Amendment…Three
    years after the Civil War and the Democrats from the North as well as
    the South were still refusing to recognize any rights of citizenship for
    black Americans. [David Barton]
    And finally, how ’bout this comment:
    discussing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 with two governors, Democrat
    Lyndon B. Johnson said “I’ll have them n*ggers voting Democrat for two
    hundred years.” His words, not mine!!!!So there you have it, is that
    How ’bout some comparisons of what happen to cities when democrats are in control?

    City, State, % of People Below
    the Poverty Level1. Detroit , MI32.5%2. Buffalo , NY29..9%3. Cincinnati ,
    OH27.8%4. Cleveland , OH27.0%5. Miami , FL26.9%5. St. Louis , MO26.8%7.
    El Paso , TX26.4%8. Milwaukee , WI26.2%9.. Philadelphia , PA25.1%10.
    Newark , NJ24.2%
    U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey,
    August 2007What do the top ten cities(over 250,000) with the
    highestpoverty rate all have in common? Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty
    rate list) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1961.Buffalo,
    NY (2nd) hasn’t electeda Republican mayor since 1954.Cincinnati , OH
    (3rd) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1984.Cleveland , OH (4th)
    hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since 1989.Miami , FL (5th)
    has never hada Republican mayor.St. Louis , MO (6th) hasn’t elected a
    Republican mayor since 1949.El Paso , TX (7th) has never hada Republican
    mayor.Milwaukee , WI (8th) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since
    1908.Philadelphia , PA (9th) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since
    1952.Newark , NJ (10th) hasn’t elected a Republican mayor since
    1907.Einstein once said, ‘The definition of insanity is doing the same
    thing over and over again and expecting different results.’
    It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats yet they are still POOR!
    Still not convinced? How ’bout a historical conversation about the democrats’ track record?

    Our Social Security Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the
    Social Security (FICA) Program. He promised: 1.) That participation in
    the Program would be Completely voluntary, No longer Voluntary 2.) That
    the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their
    annual Incomes into the Program, Now 7.65% on the first $90,000 3.)
    That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would
    be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year, No longer
    tax deductible 4.) That the money the participants put into
    the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating
    fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social
    Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and, Under
    Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent 5.) That
    the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as
    income. Under Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can
    be Taxed Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now
    receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that
    we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal
    government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the
    following: ———— ——— ——— ——— ———
    ——— —- Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from
    the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that
    Congress could spend it? A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the
    democratically controlled House and Senate. ———— ———
    ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— — Q: Which Political
    Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA)
    withholding? A: The Democratic Party. ———— ——— ———
    ——— ——— ——— ——— —– Q: Which Political Party
    started taxing Social Security annuities? A: The Democratic
    Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote
    as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the
    US ———— ——— ——— ——— ——— ———
    ——— – Q: Which Political Party decided to startgiving annuity
    payments to immigrants?
    Do I need to tell you?


    • cimiron

      great post and so true all of it

  • danny

    Tell the truth Mr west. Tell the truth

    • Saintsation

      I would vote for these men for President…Allen West, And Dr. Carson.
      Both intelligent and down to earth.

  • Jon Blackburn

    If the Democrats really wanted to change that fact, we wouldn’t have Obamamcare.

    • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


      Opposing Immigration Raids

      • President Obama opposes immigration raids designed to identify illegal immigrants in workplaces or housing units.

      “Path to Citizenship”

      • Obama says the U.S. should “allow undocumented immigrants who are in good standing to pay a fine, learn English, and go to the back of the line for the opportunity to become citizens.” He supports a “path to citizenship” for illegal aliens, so as to “bring people out of the shadows” and allow them “to fully embrace our values and become full members of our democracy.”

      Driver’s Licenses for Illegals

      • Obama favors permitting illegal immigrants to obtain driver’s licenses. “When I was a state senator in Illinois,” Obama has said, “I voted to require that illegal aliens get trained, get a license, get insurance to protect public safety. That was my intention. The problem we have here is not driver’s licenses. Undocumented workers do not come here to drive. They’re here to work.”

      Social Security Benefits for Illegals

      • Obama voted in favor of allowing former illegal aliens who had previously worked at jobs under phony or stolen Social Security numbers, to someday reap the benefits of whatever Social Security contributions they may have made while they were so employed.

      “Family Reunification”

      • Obama voted in favor of an amendment placing an expiration date on a point-based immigration system (i.e., a system that seeks to ensure that people with skills that society needs are given preference for entry into the United States). Obama instead advocates a system focusing on the reunification of family members, even if that means permitting the relatives of illegal aliens to join the latter in America.

      The DREAM Act

      • As a U.S. senator, Obama was a supporter of the DREAM Act, intended to allow illegal aliens to attend college at the reduced tuition rates normally reserved for in-state legal residents, and providing a path to citizenship. He helped to pass a state version of such a law in Illinois during his years as a state senator.

      Legalizing Illegal Aliens, to Make Them Eligible for Health Care

      • On September 18, 2009, The Washington Times reported: “President Obama said this week that his health care plan won’t cover illegal immigrants, but argued that’s all the more reason to legalize them and ensure they eventually do get coverage.” “Even though I do not believe we can extend coverage to those who are here illegally,” Obama told the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute, “… this debate underscores the necessity of passing comprehensive immigration reform and resolving the issue of 12 million undocumented people living and working in this country once and for all.”

      Obama Justice Department Sues Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio

      • In September 2010, the Obama Justice Department sued Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio, known for his aggressive policies against illegal immigration. In the greater Phoenix area, Arpaio had established a hotline for the public to report immigration violations. He also had conducted numerous crime and immigration sweeps in heavily Latino neighborhoods, and he frequently raided workplaces in search of people residing in the U.S. illegally.

      Changing Deportation Policy

      • In August 2011, President Obama issued an executive order toprevent potentially thousands of cases in federal immigration court from moving forward if they did not involve criminals or people with flagrant immigration violations. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that the agency would launch a case-by-case review of 300,000 cases pending in immigration courts across the nation to focus on the federal government’s top priority, detaining and deporting criminals and serious violators of immigration law. Immigrants classified as low-priority cases would be eligible to receive a stay of deportation and the chance to apply for a work permit.

      For more information click on the following link.

      • Jon Blackburn

        Wow! That’s a lot. I’ll take a look.

  • hangman57

    Democrats Have been Killing Blacks for 150 years . It started with the Klan and still happening to day with Black on Black crime . There is about 10,000 blacks a year that die by the hand of other Blacks . Because they live in substandard living conditions all set-up by the Democratic Party . Instead of giving real hope to rise up out of the Project slums all over this Nation . Democrats in Congress just gives them more of the same . Two Black Leaders ,Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson all they do is spew hate and division among whites and Blacks . But they are they problem for blacks ,they never have solutions . Obama brought Hope & Change in 2008 and Move Forward in 2012 . But problems have got worst for blacks ,not better . They only way out is blacks to say no more Government for them and start up a business or Educate themselves and get out of there .

  • hangman57

    The Democratic party started the KKK 150 years ago after the Civil War. To control blacks who run off the plantations and didn’t want to work for their old masters after the war. Today Democrats want control over blacks ,just for their votes . So they promise Welfare ,Food Stamps , WIC ,Heap, Obamacare , Government Housing under HUD . If blacks could only see ,this just another form of Slavery . It will never end till Blacks are sick of seeing gangs killing their love ones and decide to make a change for the rest of their family . God Bless Them all .

  • hangman57

    Back during the Civil War Democrats organized the KKK to keep Blacks away from the Voting stations . It was the Republicans that went into the southern states to sign up Blacks to vote . Many Republicans die doing this . The reason Democrats didn’t want blacks to vote was because they were voting Republican back than . Democrats would never have any say in what they could do or vote into office . Because there was more blacks than with voters back than.

    • Jeff Castille

      Am I correct in assuming you meant to use the word “then” rather than the word “than” at least three times???

  • pat ange


  • Karl G. Smith

    Only thing different between modern Democrats and Democrats of old are the fashions and century. Strategies and objectives remains the same.

  • Flavius Josephus

    These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.”—LBJ
    You can find this in Ronald Kessler’s “Inside The White House”

    “Not Enough to make a Difference”……LBJ

    First let me say that I want you think about how powerful a weapon socialism is; especially when used in hands of skillful people. Lyndon Johnson and Barrack Obama have proven to be two of the absolute best.
    It is a powerful thing when you can get almost a whole demographic of people and millions more to willfully and gladly reach down and re-shackle themselves into a slavey that so many people died to free them from. In that sense, the slavery of government dependency is worse than chattel slavery. Why? Because you enter into it gladly and of your own volition.
    Next comes the destruction of the family then abject poverty that continues generation after generation. What is devastating, is that you still think that the government is doing you a favor and that you are “getting over” on the stupid people that get up and go to work every day. You are even so blinded by that first of the month largess that you fail to realize that you are living in a rat infested, crime infested, drug infested neighborhood where it is not safe for your children to play in the yard and your young son may not live to the age of 20. Now you are addicted to the first of the month and you have to vote for a certain party to keep those checks coming. Why? Because “The Democrats take care of the little guy and the poor.”
    Adolf Hitler, Mao Zedong, Stalin, Pol Pot and Castro all used this same strategy because it works every time it’s been tried. Now that poverty is not just confined to Blacks but is now spread out across all demographics here in America.
    You now see Blacks, Hispanics, single women with and without children, young people who have been indoctrinated and ignorant people who just don’t know any better all vote Democrat? Read the Communist Manifesto.

    • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


      Obama’s Stance on Abortion

      • During his years as a state and federal legislator, Obama consistently voted in favor of expanding abortion rights and the funding of abortion services with taxpayer dollars. Says author David Freddoso, “I could find no instance in his entire career in which he voted for any regulation or restriction on the practice of abortion.”

      • In July 2006 Obama voted against a bill stipulating that the parents of minor girls who get out-of-state abortions must be notified of their daughters’ actions. In March 2008 he voted against a bill prohibiting minors from crossing state lines to gain access to abortion services.That same month, he voted “No” on defining an unborn child as a human being eligible for the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.

      • On July 17, 2007, Obama declared: “The first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.” This bill would have effectively terminated all state restrictions on government funding for abortions. It would also have invalidated state laws that protected medical personnel from losing their jobs if they refused to participate in abortion procedures.

      Obama’s Support for Planned Parenthood

      • The largest abortion provider in the United States, Planned Parenthood in 2008 alone was responsible for 324,008 abortions, as compared to just 2,405 adoption referrals. This ratio was representative of the organization’s activities in most years.

      • On July 17, 2007, Obama thanked Planned Parenthood for “the outstanding work” it was doing “for women all across the country and for families all across the country…. I put Roe at the center of my lesson plan on reproductive freedom when I taught Constitutional Law. Not simply as a case about privacy but as part of the broader struggle for women’s equality.”

      • During an April 26, 2013 speech to Planned Parenthood, Obama said: “As long as we’ve got to fight to make sure women have access to quality, affordable health care, and as long as we’ve got to fight to protect a woman’s right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know that you’ve also got a president who’s going to be right there with you, fighting every step of the way. Thank you, Planned Parenthood. God bless you.”

      Obama and Partial-Birth Abortion

      • When Obama was a state senator in 1997, two separate “partial-birth abortion” bans came up for consideration. On both occasions Obama voted “present,” the functional equivalent of a vote against the ban. The term “partial-birth abortion” refers to a procedure where the abortionist maneuvers the baby into a breech (feet-first) delivery position, permits the baby’s entire body to exit the birth canal except for its head, and then uses scissors to puncture the baby’s brain and kill it (while the head is still inside the mother).

      • In 2000, Obama voted against a bill that would have ended state funding for partial-birth abortions.

      A Legalized Form of Infanticide

      • In 2002 Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that somehow survived late-term abortion procedures. The Act twice came up in the Judiciary Committee on which Obama served. At its first reading he voted “present,” the functional equivalent of voting against it. At the second reading, he voted “No.” The bill was then referred to the senate’s Health and Human Services Committee, which Obama chaired after 2003. As chairman, he chose never to call the bill up for a vote.

      Obama Strikes Down Rule that Prohibited U.S. Funding of Abortion Clinics Overseas

      • On January 23, 2009—the day after the 36th anniversary of the famous Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision—President Obamastruck down a rule that had prohibited U.S. money from being used to fund international family-planning clinics that either promote abortion or provide referrals to abortion services. Stating that such restrictions on funding had been used as a “political wedge issue,” the President said that he had “no desire to continue this stale and fruitless debate.”

      For more information click on the following link.

      • Flavius Josephus

        Obama has governed against everything low income people need to lift themselves out of poverty. Seems like along with the left, he has supported every issue that goes against the word of God. . God Bless.

        • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

          The Shared Agendas of George Soros and Barack Obama
          By Discover The Networks
          February 2011

          While George Soros was busy bankrolling his battalion of established activist groups and launching a few new ones of his own, he quite naturally looked toward the upcoming presidential election of 2008 with great anticipation, eagerly awaiting the day when George W. Bush would finally leave office. The question was, who would replace him? In recent years, all indications had been that Soros favored Hillary Clinton above most, if not all, other potential Democratic candidates for President. But now there was a new face on the scene¯a young, charismatic U.S. senator from Illinois named Barack Obama¯who seemed not only to share virtually all of Soros’s values and agendas, but also appeared to be a highly skilled politician who stood a good chance of getting elected to the nation’s highest office.

          In December of 2006, Soros, who had previously hosted a fundraiser for Obama during the latter’s 2004 Senate campaign, met with Obama in Soros’s New York office. Just a few weeks later¯on January 16, 2007¯Obama announced that he would form a presidential exploratory committee and was contemplating a run for the White House. Within hours, Soros sent the senator a contribution of $2,100, the maximum amount allowable under campaign-finance laws. Later that week, the New York Daily News reported that Soros would support Obama rather than Hillary Clinton for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, though Soros pledged to back the New York senator were she to emerge as the nominee.1 But it was clear that Soros considered Obama to be the more electable candidate of the two. Most importantly, Obama’s economic and political prescriptions for America were wholly accordant with those of Soros.

          • Flavius Josephus

            Obama¯who seemed not only to share virtually all of Soros’s values and agendas,
            Given Soros’s support of everything socialist and atheist, I would say that they are very comparable. During Obama’s first term Soros was a frequent visiter to the Oval Office. I suspect Soros has significant influence on Obama. I dare say that he is the evil wizard behind the curtain.

    • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


      Obama’s Mushrooming Welfare State

      • From 2008 to 2011, federal welfare assistance (in America’s 79 means-tested federal welfare programs) grew by 32%, from $563.413 billion to $745.84 billion annually. According to Heritage Foundation Senior Research Fellow Robert Rector, the spike in federal welfare spending during Obama’s first two years in office was two-and-a-half times greater than any previous increase in American history, after adjusting for inflation.

      • According to a CNS News report, “Obama’s spending proposals call for the largest increases in welfare benefits in U.S. history … a spending total of $10.3 trillion over the next decade on various welfare programs. These include cash payments, food, housing, Medicaid and various social services for low-income Americans …”

      Obama Has Long Opposed Welfare Reform

      • When he was an Illinois state senator in 1996, Obama spoke from the floor against implementing the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), which was ultimately passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. That welfare-reform bill placed certain limitations on how long a household could continue to receive benefits, and instituted a work requirement designed to move people off the welfare rolls and into paying jobs. Ultimately, PRWORS reduced the number of households participating in the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFCDC) program by 60%, from 5.1 million to 2 million.

      • Upon joining the U.S. Senate in January 2005, Obama quickly set out to undermine the welfare-reform law. Consider that in 2005, Congress closed a loophole that had permitted some states tocircumvent the legislation by defining as “work” such activities as bed rest, personal care activities, massage, exercise, journaling, motivational reading, smoking cessation, weight loss promotion, participation in parent-teacher meetings, or helping friends or family with household tasks and errands. Obama strongly objected to the closure of that loophole.

      Ending the Work Requirements for Welfare

      • On July 12, 2012, President Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a policy directive eliminating the federal work requirements that were the essential ingredient of the 1996 welfare-reform bill (PRWORA). Thus did Obama promote the further expansion of the American welfare state.

      For more information click on the following link.

    • ebigg2000

      That was poignant Sir and truth unfortunately few embrace, but it will take brave people like yourself to keep ringing the alarm bells and hopefully will they raise up others who will begin to ring the bells of liberty from the enslavement of the socialist democrats.

  • joshuasweet

    why change that when they can make people ignore their history as they have?.

  • karen

    Amén to that I love everone thats what christ wants us to do

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


    Obama Characterizes America As “Mean-Spirited,” Where Race is Concerned

    • In an interview published by the Daily Herald on March 3, 1990, Harvard Law School student Barack Obama said: “There’s certainly racism here [at Harvard Law School]. There are certain burdens that are placed [on blacks], more emotionally at this point than concretely…. Hopefully, more and more people will begin to feel their story is somehow part of this larger story of how we’re going to reshape America in a way that is less mean-spirited and more generous. I mean, I really hope to be part of a transformation of this country.”

    Obama Supports Professor Derrick Bell, Godfather of “Critical Race Theory”

    • In 1991, Obama, who was then president of the Harvard Law Review and a well-known figure on the Harvard campus, spoke at a rally in support of Professor Derrick Bell, encouraging his fellow students to “open up your hearts and minds to the words” of that individual, whom Obama described as someone who spoke “the truth.”

    • Professor Bell was the godfather of Critical Race Theory, which contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently the nation’s legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid. It also holds that because racism is so deeply ingrained in the American character, traditional American ideals such as meritocracy, equal opportunity, and colorblind justice are essentially nothing more than empty slogans that fail to properly combat—or to even acknowledge the existence of—the immense structural inequities that pervade American society and work against black people. Thus, according to critical race theorists, racial preferences (favoring blacks) in employment and higher education are not only permissible but necessary as a means of countering the permanent bigotry of white people who, as Bell put it, seek to “achieve a measure of social stability through their unspoken pact to keep blacks on the bottom.”

    • Bell, who died in 2011, also made a host of racially charged statements during approximately the same period as when Obama hailed his articulation of “the truth.” Below are several examples.

    For more information click on the following link.

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


    Obama the Chicago Community Organizer

    • From the mid- to late 1980s, Barack Obama worked as a community organizer in Chicago. Thomas Sowell, the eminent Hoover Institution Fellow, offers this concise explanation of what community organizers do: “For ‘community organizers’ … racial resentments are a stock in trade…. What [they] organiz[e] are the resentments and paranoia within a community, directing those feelings against other communities, from whom either benefits or revenge are to be gotten, using whatever rhetoric or tactics will accomplish that purpose.”

    • The godfather of community organizing, Saul Alinsky, put it this way: “[The community organizer] must first rub raw the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act…. [His function is] to agitate to the point of conflict…. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it…. [T]here is no point to tactics unless one has a target upon which to center the attacks.”

    Obama’s Ties to Saul Alinsky’s Tactics for Fomenting Class Resentments

    • Three of Barack Obama’s mentors in Chicago were trained at theIndustrial Areas Foundation, founded by the famed godfather of community organizing, Saul Alinsky. In the Alinsky model, the goal is to foment, in a gradual and persistent manner, enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark social upheaval, for which Obama uses the term “transformation.” Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method for several years.

    Obama’s Introduction to ACORN and Project Vote, Groups That Pit the Poor and Nonwhite Minorities Against the Rest of Society

    • In the early to mid-1990s, Obama worked with the (now defunct) community organization ACORN and its voter-mobilization arm, Project Vote. In 2003, Manhattan Institute scholar Sol Stern wrote that ACORN, professing a dedication to “the poor and powerless,” in fact “promotes a 1960s-bred agenda of anti-capitalism, central planning, victimology, and government handouts to the poor.” ACORN, Stern elaborated, organized people “to push for ever more government control of the economy” and to pursue “the ultra-Left’s familiar anti-capitalist redistributionism.”

    Obama Calls for Massive Government Spending Hikes on Education, and the Enactment of “Living Wage” Laws

    • In an October 28, 1994 NPR interview, Obama said it would be “just plain stupid”—and would reflect “a moral deficit”—for anyone to oppose making a taxpayer-funded “investment” in the expansion of government programs for children and low-income workers: “Real opportunity would mean quality prenatal care for all women and well-funded and innovative public schools for all children … a job at a living wage for everyone who was willing to work …”

    Obama Emphasizes Inter-Group Conflict

    • In a 1995 interview, Obama said: “[M]any of the problems that Africa faces, whether it’s poverty or political suppression or ethnic conflict is just as prominent there and can’t all be blamed on the effects of colonialism. What it can be blamed on is some of the common factors that affect Bosnia or Los Angeles or all kinds of places on this earth, and that is the tendency for one group to try to suppress another group in the interest of power or greed or resources or what have you.”

    Obama Scapegoats the “Top 5 Percent”

    • In a December 28, 1995 interview published in the Hyde Park Citizen newspaper, Obama explained his views on income inequality in the United States: “In an environment of scarcity, where the cost of living is rising, folks begin to get angry and bitter and look for scapegoats. Historically, instead of looking at the top 5% of this country that controls all the wealth, we turn towards each other, and the Republicans have added to the fire.”

    • In that same interview, Obama said that his perspective on the “top 5%” had been shaped by his experiences abroad: “It’s about power. My travels made me sensitive to the plight of those without power and the issues of class and inequalities as it relates to wealth and power. Anytime you have been overseas in these so-called third world countries, one thing you see is the vast disparity of wealth of those who are part of power structure and those outside of it.”

    Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, and Obama’s Entry into Politics

    • In the mid-1990s, Obama entered electoral politics, setting his sights initially on a state senate seat in Illinois. He launched his political career in the home of two well-connected Chicagoans, longtime activists who would help him make important contacts and enlarge his public profile. These two allies were Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, lifelong Marxists who in the 1960s and ’70s had been revolutionary leaders of the Weather Underground Organization, a domestic terror group that aspired to transform the U.S. into a Communist country.

    Obama Views the Poor As a Potential “Voting Bloc”

    At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, Barack Obama statedthat the “working poor” on welfare constituted a political voting bloc that could be harnessed to the advantage of Democrats. Specifically, he said that:

    • “To the extent that we are doing research figuring out what kinds of government action would successfully make their [the working poor’s] lives better, we are then putting together a potential majority coalition to move those agendas forward.”

    • The “one good thing that comes out of [the welfare-reform bill of 1996] is that it essentially desegregates the welfare population,” merging urban blacks with “the working poor, which are the other people.”

    • Such a coalition becomes “one batch of folks … that is increasingly a majority population” whose policy needs would grow to encompass health care, job training, education, and a system where government would “provide effective child care.”

    “Rich People Are All for Nonviolence…. They Want to Make Sure Folks Don’t Take Their Stuff”

    • On January 21, 2002—Martin Luther King Day—then-Illinois state senator Obama appeared at a Chicago church and delivered an emotionally charged speech drenched in the rhetoric of class warfare. He said: “The philosophy of nonviolence only makes sense if the powerful can be made to recognize themselves in the powerless. It only makes sense if the powerless can be made to recognize themselves in the powerful…. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but rich people are all for nonviolence. Why wouldn’t they be? They’ve got what they want. They want to make sure folks don’t take their stuff.”

    For more information click on the following link.

  • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.

    This is Obama’s master.

    • RevG

      Wrong my friend that picture is from his family photo album

      • Ray – Jesus is the Son of God.


  • RevG

    The Racists are in the White House. The KKK is the Child of the Democratic Party.


Trending on The Black Sphere