Tired of Facebook censorship? Join Tea Party Community.

Something is afoot with the Democrats. They don’t know whether to scratch their watches or wind their asses.

I have predicted that Hillary Clinton won’t be the presidential nominee for the Democrats. There has been much positioning of Elizabeth Warren, but she won’t make it either.

There is my theory that many Democrats were positioning a Clinton/Warren ticket, but that went bust with the “Bossy” campaign, the imploded War on Women, and of course the circumspection of the two females in question.

 

Add to my own speculation the fact that, Massachusetts Democratic fraud, Sen. Elizabeth Warren said four times Monday that she’s not running for president, period, exclamation point.

During an interview with NPR’s Steve Inskeep, he asked Warren four times if she was running for president, and each time she responded, “I am not running for president.” Did Hillary get to Warren with Tanya Harding’s peeps? A bat crack over the knee caps tends to alter one’s perspective.

The fourth time when asked about running for president, Inskeep pointed out that she never said “never” about running, to which Warren became obviously frustrated, and replied,

“I am not running for president. You want me to put an exclamation point at the end?”

Warren is an idiot, political ideologically speaking; however she does recognize a potential ass-kicking when she sees one. You can get as high as she has being a lying piece of crap, and in Democrat circles, it’s encouraged. But Warren knows she will not fall under the gauntlet of protection that Obama has, because America won’t protect a lying Indian-wannabe.

There will be no woman president in 2016, and there will be no Democrat president either. The Left will want to blame Obama’s mess on Republicans, so they won’t fight too hard. This has been decided by both parties.

My theory would certainly explain Boehner, right?

 


So you liked it enough to share it? Well, don't miss out on anything else! Follow us!