Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Tired of Facebook censorship? Join Tea Party Community.

When President Trump needs an ally in judicial review, there is hardly a better one than Congressman Trey Gowdy.

America has witnessed leftists soil their pants under the cross-examination by Congressman Trey Gowdy.

His background as a prosecutor has served him well, and I’m not alone when I say, I’d hate to face Gowdy as a criminal defendant.

So when the 9th Circuit Court gave its ruling on President Trump’s travel order, Gowdy chimed in.

“No one familiar with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals should be surprised at today’s ruling. The 9th Circuit has a well-earned reputation for being presumptively reversible. Unlike the district court order, there is at least a court opinion which can be evaluated.

…the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ suggestion that even those unlawfully present in the country have certain due process rights with respect to immigration. The Court cites Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 695 (2001) for the proposition that even aliens who have committed and been convicted of certain crimes while in the U.S. unlawfully may have due process rights with respect to travel to or from the United States. In addition, the Court ventures curiously into its own role in reviewing a president’s national security conclusions.

Legal permanent residents, non-citizens with current valid visas, non-citizens with expired visas (which were once valid), aliens with no legal standing, aliens who have committed a crime but have not yet been deported, and aliens who are not even present in the United States but seek to come are just a few of the categories the Supreme Court will need to determine what process is due, if any. It seems clear to most of us – not on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals – there is no right to come to this country for non-citizens of the United States. It also seems clear judges are neither in a position, practically or jurisprudentially, to second guess national security determinations made by the commander-in-chief. There is a reason we elect the commander-in-chief and do not elect federal judges.

For those, like Alexander Hamilton, who once or now wondered if the judicial branch would be too weak, wonder no more.”

That pretty much sums it up.

You could flip a coin and get more cases right than the 9th Circuit, who gets over 80 percent of its cases overturned by the Supreme Court. Why even bother to take a case to these baboons? Unless you let them rule on it, then go the other way?!

Honestly, most Americans know that the 9th Circuit Court is really a leftist Circus Court, the “judges” serving as court jesters.

Any other judges would be embarrassed to be overturned so much, but not these amateurs.



Send this to a friend