Condi Rice BODY SLAMS Beasts on The View Over Trump’s Alleged Ties to Russia [VIDEO]
Watch the former secretary of state take down the Leftist attack dogs on the View. Her tactic? Simple facts.
There are two things to notice about this interview.
First, the alt-Left hosts cannot stop themselves from attacking the Trump administration with every question. Their goals seem to be for Rice to confirm that our current president is dirty and needs to be removed from office.
Second, with every answer, Condoleezza Rice schools all of them with the truth – an inconvenience to which they have no retort. Because how on earth could they possibly rebut actual facts.
When it comes to Russia, Condi Rice is no slouch.
The former secretary of state AND national security advisor under President George W. Bush has more knowledge about the Russians than practically anyone else on the planet.
Rice obtained a master’s degree in political science from the University of Notre Dame in 1975. Afterwards, she began work in the State Department in 1977as an intern in the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs in the Carter administration. In the summer of 1979, Rice attended Moscow State University to study Russian.
In 1981, at age 26, she received her Ph.D. in political science from the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver. Her dissertation centered on military policy and politics in what was then the communist state of Czechoslovakia.
From 1980 to 1981, she was a fellow at Stanford University’s Arms Control and Disarmament Program, having won a Ford Foundation Dual Expertise Fellowship in Soviet Studies and International Security.
Among Rice’s book are, The Gorbachev Era (1986) with Alexander Dallin and Uncertain Allegiance: The Soviet Union and the Czechoslovak Army (1984).
So, why would the ladies of The View think they could convert her into a Trump-hating liberal simply by asking some inherently biased questions?
Liberal Halfwit Question #1 –
Whoopi Goldberg questioned why Trump was so stubborn about appointing Michael Flynn as national security advisor.
Refusing to attack Trump, Condi artfully responded:
“Let me just say, I’ve been in Washington. And a lot of times people say, Oh, I told him this. I told him that. I don’t know what those conversations were really like. So, I’m not gonna go there. I’m just gonna tell you this: Michael Flynn is gone. And H. R. McMaster is as good as you can do for national security advisor. And so Americans ought to be comforted by the character of the person who is there.”
Yet, the questions these hosts asked the Russia expert show an assumption that they know better than she does, what should or should not be investigated with regard to Russia. Their hubris is beyond laughable.
Liberal Halfwit Question #2 –
Sunny Hostin continued the Trump attack, by trying to get Condi to convict Flynn based on hearsay.
Condi didn’t take the bait. Instead, she educated the host on how the transition of power works:
“Let me make a distinction here. Because when you are the national security advisor elect, you will have conversations with foreigners. The thing you shouldn’t do is talk about policy. I don’t know what Michael Flynn did or did not say. I’ll just say that as a matter of principle, you can talk to anybody in that period. But you should not suggest that they may be making changes in policy.”
That sounds like exactly what we have Obama on video doing before his re-election in 2012. The liberal hypocrites have no proof regarding Flynn, but stand ready to condemn him. And yet, they do have proof of Obama’s inappropriate remarks, and stand mute.
Liberal Halfwit Question #3 –
Then Joy Behar jumped into the fray, attacking Rex Tillerson, and suggesting Russian spies have infiltrated the Trump team.
The Russia expert invalidated every liberal excuse about Russia being the reason Hillary lost.
“Putin has been trying to interfere in ours and everybody else’s elections for a very long time. Vladimir Putin is an eye for an eye kind of guy. Hillary Clinton questioned the legitimacy of his election in 2012. Now, Putin is going to question the legitimacy of our election by hacking into it. So, don’t let him get the satisfaction of thinking that we don’t believe our own elections to be legitimate.”
Liberal Halfwit Question #4 –
But Hostin pushed back:
“But, Madam Secretary, if he did, in fact, engage in these types of tactics in our election, then the very legitimacy of our election is at issue, isn’t it?”
Once again, Condi schooled the uneducated, propaganda-believing leftist.
“No. No. I trust the people who voted in Wisconsin, and Texas, and Alabama, and California, to have voted on the basis of who they thought was best going to represent their interests. So, I’m not going to question the legitimacy of their vote because Vladimir Putin tried to interfere in the election. That’s just a step that I don’t think we should take. Let’s trust our fellow citizens.”
A voice of reason amid the alt-Left pity party that refuses to make Hillary own her electoral defeat.