Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Tired of Facebook censorship? Join Tea Party Community.

Bernie Supporters are Correct! Election Rigging Finally Proven.

Courts finally concede that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is guilty.

The DNC favored Hillary over Sanders, therefore, they skewed the primary results. 

election rigging finally proven; Kevin JacksonIt looks like Wasserman-Schutlz had problems long before she was busted for her sympathetic treatment of the Muslim spies stealing hard-drives. The socialist-loving Sanders supporters are on to her, and they know she rigged the primaries. Unfortunately for the Bernie fanatics, proof of her guilt doesn’t amount to a hill of beans. In what will shock the Left, the DNC has the right to choose their candidate, regardless of what the voters want.

As the Observer reports:

In June 2016, a class action lawsuit was filed against the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz for violating the DNC Charter by rigging the Democratic presidential primaries for Hillary Clinton against Bernie Sanders. Even former Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid admitted in July 2016, “I knew—everybody knew—that this was not a fair deal.” He added that Debbie Wasserman Schultz should have resigned much sooner than she did. The lawsuit was filed to push the DNC to admit their wrongdoing and provide Bernie Sanders supporters, who supported him financially with millions of dollars in campaign contributions, with restitution for being cheated.

Lying and Cheating isn’t Illegal…in Politics

Unfortunately for Bernie supporters, all they’ll get out of this is the court’s agreement. The Democrats lied and cheated. However, legally speaking, lying and cheating in politics is not exactly against the law.

As the article continues:

On August 25, 2017, Federal Judge William Zloch, dismissed the lawsuit after several months of litigation during which DNC attorneys argued that the DNC would be well within their rights to select their own candidate. “In evaluating Plaintiffs’ claims at this stage, the Court assumes their allegations are true—that the DNC and Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Clinton and sought to propel her ahead of her Democratic opponent,” the court order dismissing the lawsuit stated. This assumption of a plaintiff’s allegation is the general legal standard in the motion to dismiss stage of any lawsuit. The allegations contained in the complaint must be taken as true unless they are merely conclusory allegations or are invalid on their face.

The Court continued, “For their part, the DNC and Wasserman Schultz have characterized the DNC charter’s promise of ‘impartiality and evenhandedness’ as a mere political promise—political rhetoric that is not enforceable in federal courts. The Court does not accept this trivialization of the DNC’s governing principles. While it may be true in the abstract that the DNC has the right to have its delegates ‘go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way,’ the DNC, through its charter, has committed itself to a higher principle.”

So basically, the primaries were rigged. Yes, Hillary was given an unfair fake advantage. Unfortunately, the court has no jurisdiction over the matter.

So, once again, Hillary gets off on a technicality and so do her co-conspirators.

Left vs. Right

Ironically, the left has wasted countless hours and resources accusing Trump of being the cheater. The Russian narrative is by far the most famous story the DNC spins as the reason for their brutal defeat. Meanwhile, the real cheating happened in their very own party.

Regardless, Sanders would have fared no better against Trump. Like Wasserman-Schultz and Hillary Clinton, Sanders is just another dishonest Democrat, which is why he took his payoff. Years of crying poverty left Sanders longing for wealth.

Sanders raked in millions while sitting in Congress. Moreover, he made sure his family profited as well.

Back to Debbie

At the end of the day, cheating Bernie out of his bid for president is the least of Debbie Wasserman-Schultz’s worries. It seems the Democrats are finally ready to cut ties with the crooked former-chairman of the DNC.

For months, we have followed Wasserman-Schultz and her tie to the Muslim spies who made a killing off Congress with their IT scams. And, despite the mounting piles of evidence, Wasserman-Schultz couldn’t bring herself to fire the Awan brothers. Instead, she tried to aid in their escape.

As we’ve noted on several occasions:

The brothers had a trail of problems behind them. From unpaid loans and stolen car scams to DWI’s and real estate fraud- these brothers were robbing Americans blind. Meanwhile, they sent bucket loads of money to Pakistan.

Not only did Wasserman-Schultz defend he Awan brothers, she actually claimed these men were victims of racism. Her statements defied logic. Now the Democrats in search of rebranding are ready to drop Wasserman-Schultz like a bad habit. It won’t be enough to redeem leftists, but it’s a start.

 

 



Send this to a friend