Does the Gay Agenda Trumpt the American Agenda?

I believe that Obama’s evolution with respect to gay issues is based on his sexual past. Big deal. Other than pop culture curiosity, I don’t think most conservatives care about Obama’s sexual past, present, or future. But we do care when the gay agenda supersedes the American agenda. I believe that a president’s singular agendum should be the betterment of the entire nation, not various segments.

I discuss my book The BIG Black Lie my discovery of “gay,” which was fairly benign. I was around 12 years old, and my grandfather had stopped to gas up, before we left Dallas. As my grandfather pumped gas, I saw what I thought to be at the time, “the prettiest man I had ever seen.” He was very well-dressed, but noticeably different from what I had been raised to think of a man. He was perfectly dressed in a tan jumpsuit, and he had a beret to match.  I remember he carried a matching clutch that looped around his neck and was tucked just below his armpit.

As a kid from the country, I had never seen such style in my life. I had to know what I was seeing, so I whispered for my grandmother to look at the man as he walked by. My grandmother took a stealthy glance, then whispered to me, “He’s funny.”

I had no idea what “funny” meant, but would learn over time. Until further revelations, I just knew that I wasn’t “funny.”

Over time, I altered my perception of what a man is. I would further learn of all the variations in how people form that make the idea of gender confusing at times. I developed compassion for people in these areas, and learned to respect the idea that the human body is a complicated creation, which the mind can complicate to unfathomable degrees.

Understanding that everybody doesn’t think as I do or act as I do, I learned not moralize on the conditions of others, to just let them be. I recognized that these “different” people I described were of all races, ethnicities, creeds, and so on.

As a youth, I thought it was mainly white people who are gay. To be (openly) gay in the black culture was almost unheard of, or so I was conditioned. Prior to my exposure to “pretty man,” I had only heard of black gays anecdotally, though I do recall having certain feelings or suspicions about some males and females I had met.

In early adulthood, I recognized a very different world from what black culture had taught me. Blacks were just as gay as whites; whites were just as poor as blacks, and so on. I learned that these nice neat boxes that the world kept trying to put people in just didn’t fit.

As I traveled, I found that there were all these same “different” people all over the world. I learned that transsexuals were treated much the same almost everywhere I went. Cross-dressers were gawked at almost universally. Being gay was discouraged again almost universally. I got it. To say that there wasn’t some pushback to being gay would be naïve.

Because of my worldview, I learned that all these people were part of the human condition. They were everywhere, in all cultures. We can argue the nature nurture theory; nevertheless I assure you that I know it to be a bit of both.

My point is, I evolved. All on my own. I didn’t need the government to evolve me.

I remember when I believed the only people who had tattoos were thugs or ex-cons. Nowadays, seeing somebody with a tattoo doesn’t necessarily carry the same connotation it did decades ago, at least not for me.  However, Obama would have passed legislation to protect people with tattoos, because he believes he can control your thoughts with laws.

Like blacks (and all people) the best thing that the LGBT has is their humanity, not special legislation that puts them in a box. All the rules that were imposed for blacks essentially removed black people from the human race.

Without creating books like, “Billy has two black parents,” black people managed to overcome all the adversity of slavery and the lack of civil rights.[1] The understanding of black culture didn’t come from books, it came from people realizing the contribution that blacks have made in this country and seeing it with their own eyes.

Who knows if some of history’s most famous blacks were gay or wished they were another gender.  If you told me that George Washington Carver had dressed in women’s clothes, it would not diminish his accomplishments to the world in the least. Nor do Carver’s accomplishments have more impact on America because he was black. Peanut butter is delicious, regardless of Carver’s sexuality, ethnicity, and any other proclivities he may have had.

You would think that we would have learned something by now about how to deal with people, and not attempt to legislate thought. Despite what people may believe, Civil Rights laws are not the reason Obama is president. Obama is president, because of the actions of people like Jesse Owens, Arthur Ashe, Jackie Robinson, and millions of other non-descript blacks who in their own small ways changed the hearts of minds of racists in America.

Because of these unheralded black Americans, America long ago abandoned focusing on color—save the racists who voted for Obama strictly because he was black. For the most part, the people who voted for Obama did so because they felt he was going to be a transformational figure in American politics, not gay politics or black politics.

There has been a lot of money spent on removing people from the human race, and putting them in boxes. Obama wants to do the same for the LGBT, because of his life experiences and his evolution. $17T has been spent on the evolution of “helping blacks,” and I don’t see a lot of progress at the Main Street level. How much money is America willing spend on LGBT agenda? How many more manuals and training sessions do we need for Americans to understand gays?

For the most part, Americans interact with people based on our needs and their performance. I choose my friends based on common core values, without moralizing about those who values don’t necessarily agree with mine. I don’t have to have gay friends in order to not be homophobic. I don’t need white friends to prove I’m not racist.

All men are created equal. It’s time Obama stop with the politicizing various agendas, and focus on the human agenda, the American agenda.

© Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved.

Kevin Jackson is an Amazon best-selling author and award-winning blogger. He also hosts a daily radio show.

Liberals Should Thank Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh is a Conservative god, but he doesn’t speak for all Conservatives despite what the lamestream media and others on the Left want people to believe. And occasionally Limbaugh makes a mistake.

We can all admit that Limbaugh’s comment about Sandra Fluke being a slut was crass. Regardless of the moral implications of Fluke’s testimony before Congress about contraception and wanting her college to provide free contraceptives, the fact is that Fluke can have all the free sex she wants.  That really is her choice.

If Fluke wants to have sex for money, then Fluke’s choice is diminished somewhat by a bunch of mainly white men known as our “government.” The government mandates that if Fluke wants to get paid to have sex, her choices are as follows:

(1) Risk getting arrested for choosing to charge for sex, or

(2) Move to a location where the government authorizes sex for money, so that the government will regulate and tax her vagina and other bodily orifices she may use in providing said paid sexual services.

Apparently the NOW movement still has a bit of work to do when it comes to paid sex. Free sex however has few restrictions. NOW has earned Fluke the right to be as promiscuous as her vagina and lesser attributes will allow, and with no moral implications.

Who are non-governmental mere mortal men to moralize unattainable sexual standards on women?  These men should leave women who wish to waddle in the wasteland of no holds barred, no harm no foul sex with anybody and everybody.  The new mantra of freedom for sexual pleasure is now “all a PERSON needs for sex is a location.”

Meddling Conservative men really must hate women, when you think about it. Conservative men feign idolatry of a woman’s virtue, all in an effort to actually demonize women; to strip them of their rights to be as sex-craved as men.

This is why Liberals should embrace Limbaugh.  Limbaugh divulged the Conservative man’s ugly secret of wanting to put woman on a pedestal. How deviant.

Limbaugh’s comment had the added affect of overshadowing the point that Fluke was making, which is one way or another Liberal women want to be paid to have sex one way or another.

Fluke didn’t argue to help coed men to get $1K annually for condoms. Think of the problem the lack of money, ergo condoms has created in the black community. Many young black simply do not buy condoms, as they are cost-prohibitive.  And there is no shortage of young black women who seem ready to allow young black men to profiteer on the Women’s Movement, and thus are willing to accommodate these economically depressed young studs.

In one case a young black man fathered 23 children by 14 different women. This guy should get a Nobel “Piece” Prize, if you ask me, but he would have many challengers and the record is in danger of being broken soon.

And this problem is not just within the black community, nor is it limited to the U.S. The U.K Examiner reported on this white British deadbeat who faked his death in order to avoid paying child support on his 8 children by multiple mothers.  He had another little one on the way…by another mother.

Fluke did not argue for coed men to get vasectomies so God-forbid, men are not burdened with babies. Has Fluke even considered how much money a baby costs a man in child-support, and sometimes spousal support, even when the man may not be the father of the child, or the fact that woman doesn’t have to be a spouse?

And once a man has finished sowing his oats, who pays for the reverse vasectomy? The man? What kind of Amazonian world do we live in, where men are emasculated and forced to do all the bidding of women and then pay for the privilege?!

The NOW generation has given the women of today freedom to choose, and women are picking deadbeats by the dozen all over the world. Thankfully here in America, the taxpayer remains vigilant to pick up the pieces, regardless of the woman’s and deadbeat man’s choices.

Why shouldn’t the Women’s Movement go full circle and require that we prevent them from having the burden of children with a knuckledragging Neanderthal who was just all about the sex?  It’s our civic duty.

The pill can do what no parent can. The pill doesn’t moralize when a  young woman decides to have sex with a miscreant. Statistically speaking, if you have sex with enough bad boys, you will ultimately end up with Mr. Right, right?

Limbaugh was wrong to treat women as sacrosanct. Women are humans. Women can do what they want, just like men. Ladies on the other hand respect their virtue and don’t put their business in the streets, nor do they expect a man to pay for it.

That’s my rant!

© 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Cain Brings Back the Good Ol’ Days for Democrats, by Kevin Jackson

You won’t hear any report of this, but Democrats partied like rock stars on Saturday night, December 3, 2011. Behind closed doors all over the country, Democrats celebrated December 3, 2011 like it was the election of Barack Hussein Obama all over again. It was not the ascension of a half-black man that was the cause of Democrat’s exuberance, but instead was the demise of a full black man.

For Democrats all is good in the world, as the Republican Party is ALL white again.

Just in the nick of time, too.  There are Democrat strategists high-fiving each other, saying “Whew, that was CLOSE!”

They’re right. Cain almost got away. The black Conservative who escaped beyond the plantation’s alligator-infested boundary to spread his message of American exceptionalism across the countryside had to be stopped.  Had Cain not been stopped, he might have infected other blacks with that crazy talk. Imagine a world where black zombies were muttering 9-9-9 all the time.

Luckily Democrats were able to do what they always do when a black man not of their choosing aims too high.  Democrats turned on the water cannons and unleashed the dogs. Female dogs. I believe the technical term is bitches.

No need to rehash how Democrats used white women and ultimately a white woman named White to bring down the accomplished black man with the biblical name. What’s important to know is that they accomplished it. Democrats are just repeating history, again openly oppressing blacks as Democrats did back in the day.

I say openly, because new millennium Democrats have evolved their oppression of blacks.  They are clever in that they now oppress blacks without making it appear that they are oppressing blacks, then blame Republicans. Genius, when you think about it.

Nevertheless, Democrat tactics remain the same.  Make examples of a few uppity blacks, which serves to keep other blacks in check.  It doesn’t take many lynchings to make a point.

Back in the day, all it took for a black man to be hung by deranged Democrats was for the black man to simply look at a white woman.  Black men were to walk with their heads down when approaching a white woman, and don’t dare speak to one.

The Democrats didn’t have to kill Cain. They could have just knocked him off his high horse, as they did with the first few white women.  His numbers had slipped enough, his reputation sullied so that he stood little chance of being the first full black president.  Instead however the Democrats knew it was necessary to destroy Cain, to kill his dreams and aspirations.

Democrats have been killing black people’s dreams for decades, including the most iconic dream of Dr. Martin Luther King.  King’s dream of being measured by the content of one’s character is as dead as disco.  It’s about color, stupid…period.   You’re black, ergo you’re a victim. Anybody trying to tell you otherwise, well is being uppity.

To paraphrase LBJ, Democrats realized that “Cain is getting uppity these days and that‘s a problem for us since he’s got something now he never had before, the political pull to back up his uppityness.” Damn that meddling Tea Party!

How dare that Cain want to be president? Who does this Negro think he is…a DEMOCRAT STOOGE?

Democrat’s hand-select their black presidents.  Democrat blacks must pass color and articulation tests. More importantly any potential black presidential candidate must be radical, socialist, baked in Affirmative Action and able to control black people; like the Congressional Black Caucus who holds dominion over blacks in black neighborhoods.  The minute Democrat black politicians begin to think they control white people, well now that’s just a bit too uppity for the Democrat party. Don’t try to get outside of your box, your assignment, your plantation mentality.

The lynching of Cain was slick, since it required no rope, but it was just as meaningful had Cain been hung in the public square. Cain’s demise affect is being felt in the black community as we speak.

You don’t hear the NAACP speaking out against what happened to Cain; they know that even if they wanted to speak out, they’d lose their funding.

The CBC should be outraged that a black man and Republican to boot didn’t get a fair shake in the process.  They know what the lynching of Cain meant:  It can happen to you too, Negro. Want more money for your husband’s bank or to steal more college funds from black students, then you’d better recognize.

The black Liberal population at large celebrates with their white Masters the demise of Cain, a man black Liberals have declared a “house n*gger.” Cain got what he deserved, because Cain is a product of the white man, black Democrats declared long ago, too stupid to realize what Democrats have accomplished has hurt the black community.

How many young black men could have benefitted from learning more about Cain’s accomplishments, we may never know? Anyway, why speak of the dead, Right?

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

When Liberals Ruled America

We no longer have to guess what would happen if America were run by Liberals.  Obama got elected and the Democrats controlled both houses of Congress, then shortly thereafter America revealed the stretch marks on her newly sullied underbelly, a product of birthing the Occupants.

The Occupy movement was to be Liberal’s manifest destiny.  Occupy was supposed to catch on and become the next battle cry for a Progressive Liberal Utopian (PLUtopian) revolution, yet it’s far from it.

The Occupy movement reminds me of why it’s totally unnecessary to bathe a dog.  The first opportunity the dog gets, it’s just going to go outside to roll around in the dirt again.

Here’s a quick recap of the Occupy:

First there were thefts of Occupants by Occupants. Then there were sexual assaults. Many Occupants used these gatherings to buy and sell drugs.—nothing like drug-crazed zombies roaming the streets to define your movement.

After all the eating and partying, eventually nature called, and some Occupants “paid their water bills”[1] in the park skipping the porta-potties.  If that wasn’t enough, one Occupant pinched a loaf on the flag and another defecated a police cruiser.  Occupants’ sexual activities created a run on free clinics for STD testing, and much of what the Occupants have done has created a public health issue, including an outbreak of tuberculosis in Atlanta.

Adding to this impressive resume of accomplishments, the Occupants assaulted cops, which in some cases are the very same cops asked by the Occupants to roust the homeless who wished to join the “cause.” Apparently the Occupy became a “members only” club, and the homeless were not on the list. We have a dress code, you deadbeats!

It’s easy to see why Democrats from the top down supported this movement. Obama praised the Occupants’ courage for marching against the excesses of Wall Street, and Pelosi all but organized a prayer vigil.  But hold on Hank Johnson, as Guam may have finally tipped over—Democrats may be regaining their sanity in all this.

Democrats will allow Occupants to steal, molest, pillage, harass cops, disrupt business, and reject the homeless, but they draw the line at their voters killing each other.[2] So with the recent public safety issues, it is said that the Democrats are distancing themselves from the Occupants.

As reported in the LA Times, “Democrats embrace Occupy themes, but not movement itself.”  That’s like a man who enjoys embracing other men’s genitalia, but claiming he’s not gay.

The Democrats have a long-range problem with OWS, and it’s not just the facts that the Democrats created the banking problem, or that their ideas haven’t created a single job.  The Democrats’ bigger problem is in order to distance themselves from the Occupy movement, they will need to take Little Johnny Protestor out of the will.

Democrats spawned the movement and are the reason for this movement, ergo Democrats are the movement.  The PLUtonian machine’s nuclear irradiated lab rats designed to target Conservatives and Republicans have turned on their creators.  To paraphrase famous Democrat “reverend” Jeremiah Wright, “Their chickens have come home to roost and their laying cracked eggs in the form of the Occupants.”

The free-love-no-accountability generation of the ‘60s has managed to take over major institutions of society and brainwash their progeny to believe in Utopia at somebody else’s expense.  Their kids have never faced difficulty and are likely the most self-indulgent generation in American history.

There have been wars during their time, but these wars are surgical in comparison to past wars and conflicts. More military men and women were lost in one day on D-Day, than had been lost in Iraq or Afghanistan in years of fighting.  War for Gen-X and Y is practically a video game, and if a war lasts longer than a Super Bowl halftime, they want out.

This generation of kids could care less about ethics and morality or performing hard work to get their reward. I watched an episode of Bait Car, a show where the police set up a car rigged with cameras in high crime areas in order to catch car thieves willing to steal the car.  In the episode I watched, two “hard working” PLUtonians take the bait and steal the bait car.  As they drive the car away, the driver immediately looks to Heaven to thank God for the “gift,” and cautions the passenger that he needed to to do the same, so that God would look favorably on their new bounty.  These two stooges actually make the sign of the cross, as if God would condone their crime. This is the relative morality and warped sense of judgment that guides the Left.

The Occupants and their ilk are a creation of the Left, as they represent mainly lazy, impatient clones of the Woodstock Era—the hook-up generation where everything is easy, from sex to getting something for nothing.  America bathed our dogs and we are now watching them wallow in their own filth.

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

[2] It is more difficult for Democrats to get dead voters to the polls, though it has been done

Dems Clinging to their Jews and Religion

No matter how the Left tries to spin the Republican win in NY-9, the fact is Obama and the Regressives got weinered, I’m talking stuck, skewered, screwed. How else can you defend getting your butt kicked by a rich old white Republican in a Democrat-dominated heavily Jewish district?

Weiner had a little to do with the loss, I’ll admit.  But in the scheme of things Weiner was a minor player.  And for New Yorkers, Weiner represents the type of Liberal they would have forgiven and promoted in the past, a mousey Jewish guy whom the Left canonizes.

Larger View
Graphic located at http://www.SonogramTechnician.org

Losing NY-9 was a big blog to the Liberals, and frankly, I’m concerned about Obama.  I’m not sure how much more bad news can be heaped on his frail little padded shoulders.  It simply has not been a good run over the past few weeks, when you think about it.

Unemployment up, with no end in sight.  When the White House tells you that they predict unemployment will remain above 9 percent, you know they know they are in trouble. It’s like the first step in the 12-Step Program.

Obama knows that people will not blame the Republicans when his latest “no jobs” bill fails. Who could blame the Republicans for finally finding sanity, following the Tea Party, and ending the fiscal orgy of the Liberals.

Another bad indicator:  Homelessness is up, and this despite Obama’s adding 24% to the budget to fight homelessness. It’s almost as if Obama is paying people to kick people out of their homes.

The stock market is schizophrenic to say the least, showing essentially no gain for the year.  Adjusted for “real” inflation or the devaluation of the dollar, the stock market has gained nothing. And if that’s not enough, the market tumbles each time Obama speaks publicly, as if the market knows that Obama will introduce another inane economic idea.

Obama got his money to raise the debt ceiling, and that money isn’t helping the economy at all, allowing Obama to just pay the vig on the Chinese debt.  Incomes falling, poverty rising, no bump from killing Osama, it seems that everything Obama touches turns to turd.

If I were somebody close to Obama, I’d put him under suicide watch.

As for this latest loss, the Democrats should have expected it.  I know that Turner was against overwhelming odds to win in NYC.  That notwithstanding, the rumblings were there, but like the Tea Party, the rumblings were largely ignored.

The first hint came with the loss of “the Kennedy seat.” Obama played it cool. No big deal.  The election of Scott Brown didn’t affect the outcome of ObamaCare.

Next, three governorships went to Republicans in formerly Democrat strongholds.  Obama was cool yet again, because that is his style. Cool under fire…publicly. Privately Obama was smoking like a chimney in fetal position on the sofa in the Oval Office.

The final warning bell came in what can only be described as The Carnage of 2010 for the Left. When the results of the election of 2010 were evaluated, Obama finally got a clue.
Obama admitted to receiving a shellacking. “That’s what elections are for”…shellacking!

Turner’s win is yet another indictment of Obama and Liberalism.

In this heavily Jewish NYC district, Democrats outnumber Republicans 3-to-1.  But as reported in the Wall Street Journal Online, DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman-Shultz had this to say:

“It’s a very difficult district for Democrats…”

It sure is a very difficult district for Democrats…to LOSE! But they DID IT!

A seat held by Democrats for 90 years goes to a Republican, and Wasserman-Shultz acts like it’s no big deal, business as usual. Perhaps losing is now the new business as usual for Democrats.

The Democrats were so desperate to win in the heavily Jewish district that they replaced Weiner with David Weprin, an Orthodox Jew.

There go those Democrats, clinging to their Jews and their religion! – Kevin Jackson

Weprin, a NYC Jew in a 40% Jewish area, dominated 3-to-1 by Democrats couldn’t beat an old, rich, radical, Tea Party-supported Republican fat cat?!

Can you imagine what’s happening within the DNC headquarters at this moment?  I’d be updating my resume, if I were them.  That place must resemble a morgue. No matter what they do, they are getting fleeced by the Republicans, and the Republicans don’t even have a strategy!

The Democrats demise is self-inflicted, which by the way makes it all the more fun for me.  They stayed too long in the sun and are sunburnt red like a baboon’s butt.  Democrats have NO clue what to do, because their disease causes dementia.

I have a suggestion for Liberals. Start digging your rat holes.

© 2011 – Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Recall that not long ago Garofalo was compelled to come to the aid of Barack Obama, when the nasty Republicans disagreed with his policies, calling them “reckless,” “dangerous,” and “anti-business,” all code words for “black.”  Garofalo stepped in to make sure that the new black president was not harassed further by Republicans in Congress, and that mean-spirited Tea Party.

In case you didn’t know, every black president is assigned a low-life Hollyweirdo for protection—it’s in the Constitution. Without such a low-life skanky chick like Garofalo, Obama would surely perish.

Garofalo said that the reason people were going after Obama was because he was black. And anybody who disagreed with Obama, right or wrong, was practicing “straight up racism.” Garofalo felt she needed to protect a man who could have her killed.

Garofalo is protecting two lowly Negroes for the price of one: A two-fer.

White Democrats have been helping Negroes for decades, so Garofalo is simply doing her civic duty as part of the Democrats’ “Eenie, Meanie, Mighty Mo, Catch a Negro by the Toe” program.  As part of this program, Garofalo is dumbfounded as to how Herman Cain parades around, freely to represent Republicans.  Democrats would have high-tech lynched that uppity Negro by now, if he were their property.

According to Garofalo, Republicans have conspired to let Herman Cain run for president, as he really doesn’t want to. This is how Obama made it. The powers that be decided to find a black who would be “acceptable” to the American Left. They introduced Obama in 2004, despite knowing that he was likely not a citizen and certainly unqualified. Who cares! Obama was a light-skinned Negro with no Negro dialect.

Garofalo could not allow him to enter the next election cycle butt naked. What would Obama do if racism were not kept front and center? Run on his record? Poppycock!

No self-respecting Negro president like Obama should be without the monkey of racism perched squarely on those skinny black shoulders, carried by those scrawny black hamstring muscles that don’t quite go up into the lower back. Swing low, sweet chariot, coming forth to carry me home…

With Obama’s poll numbers lower than a bull’s sack, maybe Garofalo is the unwitting stooge? Maybe she is just what the doctor ordered to get Obama back on top.

As for Cain, he is an unwitting part of the same ruse used by Democrats to get Obama elected, and the Left will not allow that.  How dare the Republicans try to rid the party of the specter of racism. Cain is getting PAID!

“Why else would a black person go against other blacks,” the white meddling Garofalo ponders. “Blacks are all supposed to be one and the same, and not think as individuals! Those frickin’ silly Negroes!”

Herman Cain is insane, and Garofalo must save him from himself. That’s what white Liberals do. They interfere, and always for the good of those they deem beneath them—like lowly Negroes. How else could an accomplished Negro like Herman Cain have survived and thrived all these years.  Would Cain’s white caretaker please stand up?

Medical degree be damn, Garofalo knows this illness like she knows the smell of rotting fish:  Cain is a sufferer of Stockholm Syndrome.

I’m not sure where Cain contracted Stockholm Syndrome. Perhaps he picked it up, when he was in Stockholm, likely traveling with inattentive white handlers who let him get too close to indigenous Swedes?Regardless, Cain’s ability to succeed on his own will truly be one for historians and anthropologists who study the lower form of human cultures to figure out.

Maybe Garofalo is a sufferer of Kenya Syndrome: The overwhelming need of skanky white Hollyweirdos to protect black people who don’t need it?

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

In a letter explaining his veto, Nixon said the photo ID requirement would have hurt senior citizens and people with disabilities who are qualified to vote but are less likely to have a drivers license or other government-issued photo ID. “Disenfranchising certain classes of persons is not acceptable,” he said.

To exercise your #1 right as a citizen of America living in the state of Missouri, you might wonder what it takes to be eligible to case your vote?

Besides having a pulse and the ability to fog a mirror, all it takes is to vote in Missouri is a utility bill, a bank statement or paycheck stub, all things you can find dumpster diving.  Have any of those easy to get  items and you get to exercise the Constitutional right afforded all American citizens living in The Democrat Union of Socialists of Missouri, by decree of Emperor Jay Nixon.

A 2007 study by Washington University found that among blacks, young people and low-income residents — historically among the most loyal Democratic supporters — about 80 percent of registered voters had access to [emphasis added] a government-issued photo ID. That compares with about 90 percent of white, middle-class and middle-aged voters.[1]

Even with all this voter disenfranchisement in Missouri, (Note race and age discrimination undertones in the study), it appears that it may not all be the fault of “the man.”

Voter turnout in the November 2010 election was 46.8%.  Apparently people are not feeling that disenfranchised when you consider that of the 80% – 90% of the people in Missouri who are not disenfranchised, only 46.8% decided to vote.[2]

Nixon knows that every citizen in Missouri can get a valid state-issued photo ID; illegals can not. And in order to win re-election, Nixon needs that vote.  He will do anything to get it, including disenfranchising productive Missouri citizens.

Will  Nixon next allow illegals to serve on our juries? Why not just elect illegals as judges? The fact is we don’t need illegals as judges; we have Democrats.

In 2006, Republican lawmakers passed a photo ID bill that was later struck down by the Missouri Supreme Court. The court ruled that the law amounted to a “heavy and substantial burden on Missourians’ free exercise of the right of suffrage.”

Seriously? Wanna guess what the makeup was of the Missouri Supreme Court was in 2006?

According to the website for the Missouri Supreme Court, justice is non-partisan, blind. It’s dumb too. In 2006, the Missouri Supreme Court had five Democrat governor-appointed justices, and two appointed by Republicans.[3]

Here’s the wrap:

Black people, young people, old people, gay people, disabled people, and all other “victims” should be tired of being used as an excuse for Democrats to steal elections and ultimately the treasury. Democrats like Nixon know that 100% participation in anything is not possible, yet they demonize the impossible and blame Republicans.

Ask yourself what you must show valid photo identification for, and you can clearly see why this veto is nonsense. You can’t rent a car or cash a check without a valid form of picture ID. You can’t get a fishing license without a photo ID.  But the ability to alter life as we know it in America can be done with a utility bill?

Democrats want America to run like other Utopias, say Cuba and Mexico. After all these countries are running so well that Democrats have allowed shrines to them on American soil.

Miami is the U.S. version of Cuba, settled by illegal immigrants who left their Motherland.  As for Mexico, we have built many shrines honoring the Mexicans reacquisition of sovereign United States:  California, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Texas are all tributes to Aztlan. Is Missouri next?

It will take more than the Mexican vote or the voting dead to carry “McLovin” Nixon to victory in 2012. Missourians, like the rest of America are not stupid. Maybe Nixon will have better luck running for governor in Mexico City.

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved.

[2] The predominantly black area of St. Louis City 37.7% voter turnout in the November 2010 election. In 2008 St. Louis City had a 61.71% voter turnout, higher by double-digits than any area in the state in 2010. Black people in St. Louis just decided not to vote in 2010, and were in no way disenfranchised.

[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_Missouri

My biological father did leave me a legacy. As an almost lifelong tenant of California correctional institutions, my father put a fear in me that only a child of an incarcerated parent can understand fully. As I said in my book The BIG Black Lie, I have always felt that I was meant to be in prison, though I certainly exhibited no actions to warrant such thoughts.

The sad part is that many black men are in the same predicament as I. There is an ominous feeling that surrounds us that we can’t explain. Like we are waiting to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. And in the black community, black men are perpetuating this feeling in their abandoned children.

I watched Maury recently—yes, my secret shame—and Maury had as one of his guests a young black man who was accused of having fathered five children by five different women. He denied them all.

As it turned out, four of them were his.  He was jubilant, actually cocky that he indeed was not five for five—the one that got away.  When asked how many children he may have fathered, he commented, “Word on the street is there are fourteen of ‘em.” ‘Em = his biological children.

The one mother who had wrongfully accused this “man” cried with joy that he was not her child’s father. Who knows if she knows who the child’s real father is, or if her child will ever know.

What I know is a child who doesn’t grow up with his biological father feels the loss. You don’t even know what the loss is, but there is a palpable loss. Not being able to define it just makes it that much more difficult to understand and ultimately hard to deal with.

I caught a break.  My grandparents stepped in and raised me, so my grandfather became my father. My grandfather was a wonderful man, though by the time he parented me and my brother he was in his early ‘60s. My grandfather did the best he could, and I treasure my relationship with him. But he didn’t raise me, like I raise my sons.

That is because there is no way to replace your biological father. Kids are wired to their biological parents, much the way a penguin can find his parent in a sea of other penguins.  Children learn about themselves through their parents. Some, like me learn that you are not necessarily all about your DNA. You can change who you are. But that doesn’t make it easier, particularly when your parent is such a terrible person, as my father was.

Thankfully my mother more than made up for him, though I ultimately lost her when I was five. Everybody I met who knew my mother said that she was a spectacular person, and wondered how she was ever snookered by my father. He was a smooth criminal, that’s for sure.

The people who know me and my mother say that I take after her, that I am in many ways like her. I smile, when I hear that. But I know that I am in many ways like my father.  The thought of this scared me for quite some time. I came to terms with that fear, figuring there was some good about my father.

He was smart and charismatic, certainly two traits that describe me. I try to use my powers for good, except when tormenting the occasional liberal.

It’s sad that since having kids I have approached Father’s Day with mixed emotions. Obviously I am ecstatic that my sons do special things for me on my special day. However I am reminded of all that I missed with my biological father, and the longing for him to have been a good dad.

My biological father is dead now, as are all the men who raised me. Nevertheless, I continue to see “father figures” in people that I meet, and in small ways I replace what I think that I missed, though I don’t full know what it is that I miss. I hate that too many black kids go through what I am going through, the constant yearning.  In the black community, it’s getting worse, not better.

For me this Father’s Day, I will join my adult-adopted father Rick, and we are headed to a Cardinal’s game. I will think of my grandfather who raised me, my step-father Tommie who was always there for me, and my great-grandfather who with few words managed to mold me into the man that I am. It will be a good Father’s Day.

But another year will pass, where I will wonder what could have been, had my father been a real father. Happy Father’s Day to the fathers who are there for their children.

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Thanks to the Conreco Group for inspiring this blog, particularly Jeff King and Jason Ivey.

“He who controls the language controls the masses”. – Saul Alinsky in Rules for Radicals

The Left controls the lexicon, so Republicans are racists.  Democrats have convinced a whole group of people (black people) that Democrats love them, yet history undoubtedly proves that Democrats were and still are the biggest racists on the planet.

Democrats say they are for the poor, so Republicans are evil capitalists. Yet evidence proves that Democrats represent the richest in government, as they are in society as a whole.

“Birthers” only wants to verify the simplest of requirements for the office of president. “Birthers” requests the simplest of documents from a president, yet the Left has made this request seem ridiculous, giving a name to those expressing doubt. The name denotes the enemy.

“Tea Baggers” are affectionately termed because they want government to be accountable to the people, as opposed to extorted and treated as pawns. “Tea Baggers” want politicians to stop acting like kings and queens—you know, the reason America was formed in the first place. Silly tea-bagging historians.

Liberals use words like entitlement, investment, social reform, and many others that have come to mean something very different than they do in reality.

We are entitled to what we earn. Period.  Anything else is charity. Would you “invest” in the government?  We have “invested” $100B in Fannie/Freddie, and they want $8.5B more. The CEO of Freddie Mac says he likely won’t be able to pay us back. How’s that for return on your investment? As for social reform, America is in a constant state of reform. The election of a black president proves reform.  What else would the Left have us reform, besides America as we know it.

The very same America that was the envy of all other nations, that is until the Liberals began their tinkering. What we now have is lunacy, where the lazy are rewarded, regardless of their country of origin or immigration status.

Statism appeals to those too lazy to understand that government is never benevolent.  Government depends on the uninformed, who listen only to soundbites or clever slogans. This type of communication appeals at the emotional level, but rarely passes the muster of an inspection. This is why the Left sees government as an “investment.”

Phrases like, no tax cuts for the rich, pay their fair share. The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer. No blood for oil. It’s my body.  Health care is a right. Education is a right. Welfare is a right.

Leftism promises something to someone, always at the expense of someone else.  And the someone else must be vilified for the ruse to work.  Enter stage Right.

Leftists fear the imposition of the Right’s morality on them. Conservatism interferes with the Left’s hedonistic free-sex ‘if it feels good do it” attitude. As one of my friends put it, the Left bows to the almighty orgasm.

The Left wants to regulate us from cradle to grave, and they have the biggest bully on the block, the Fed to do their will. Big Oil, Big Tobacco, and Wal-Mart are demonized by the Left, yet they pale in comparison to the power of the Fed. None of those evil capitalist companies can shut down your business or put you in jail. In fact, all evil capitalist companies do is provide opportunities. Government provides nothing, except the threat of more government. The result is the slow and steady low loss of freedom for all of us.

The Fed regulates what foods to eat, what cars to buy, how high or low to set our thermostats, what type of toilets to use.  Their moral imperative? Saving the planet!

Gay rights are a moral imperative. A woman’s right to choose is a moral imperative.  Welfare is a moral imperative, healthcare is a moral imperative, and everything else the Left wants is a moral imperative. It’s difficult to argue against moral imperatives without sounding harsh. But who are the arbiters of all that is moral?  The small group of elitists on the Left, with the support of their group-think: The Lunatic Left.

The Right won’t own the lexicon, until we own the institutions.  That’s how we will shape public opinion. Conservatives must seek an “unfair and unbalanced” media, and we must change our current indoctrination system, called public education. Conservatives must create and use the lexicon consistently and repetitively.

Entitlement = Deadbeat compensation

Education = Mis-education

Social reform = Social deform

Social security = Social insecurity or unsocial security

Medicare = MediWait

Rush has been best at getting some foothold, e.g. FemiNazi, Screwal (school). And we are now using “lamestream” in reference to the state-run media. Academia for me is Wackademia. But it will take much more creativity on our part to (1) define Liberal lunacies, and (2) to make them stick. The right rarely sets the lexicon, and when they do, they rarely follow through.

As for defining ourselves, we are Realists! We are products of human nature, where everybody is different, but our actions are predictable. We are guided by God-given core values, something the mostly God-less Left can’t understand.

Reality can be difficult to deal with. But Conservatives observe and readily accept reality. Look at the reality of the black community, the U.S. debt, illegal immigration, and ask yourself if Conservatives are reacting to the reality of the issues. Even communists recognize reality; they just choose to do nothing. Realists react.

For the Left, the Utopians everything must be perfect, or they continue to tweak. Tweakers tweak, because they don’t know when to stop. It’s a drug for them to believe that perfection is possible, fairness achievable. They take apart the radio, then put it back together with spare parts strewn about, and all that’s left is a broken radio.  Realists understand that the only perfection is in individualism, and even that is not 100% perfect, just the closest it is possible to achieve.

From the movie Men In Black:

Agent J (Will Smith) in protesting a long standing agency policy of keeping the public in the dark about threats from other galaxies, tells his partner Agent K (Tommy Lee Jones)

“People are smarter than that”.

K replies: “No.  A person is smart.  People are scared, dumb animals.”

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

The most recent Republican snafu has CA Republican National Committee member Marilyn Davenport emailing a picture depicting Obama as the child of chimpanzees.  What’s not being discussed is the picture clearly implies that Obama’s mother was a chimpanzee as well as he and his father, thus making the picture equally racist against blacks and whites.

Because of all the hoopla this graphic created, I asked myself, “Are white people tougher than black Liberals?”

White folks are not complaining about the distastefulness of the picture depicting a white woman as a chimpanzee, ergo stupid, much less the racial underpinnings.  White people aren’t complaining, because white people don’t feel like chimpanzees.  All the photoshopped chimps of white people traveling the information superhighway won’t change the way white people feel about themselves.

But let a black man be depicted as a chimpanzee and all hell breaks loose.  Black liberals are upset, but white Liberals are even more outraged on behalf of Obama.  Yet again white Liberals feel the need to protect the black man who is currently the most powerful person in the world. Do I really need to point out just how racist this is?

Ok I will. White Liberals want us to clearly understand that ANY white person is more powerful than the most powerful black man in the world. The most heinous of racist think this way.

These Liberal racists felt no such need to protect George Bush, who was often compared to chimpanzees or worse, much moreso than Obama. The same is true of Nancy Pelosi. She has been depicted as the Wicked Witch of the West, the bride of Hitler, and of course a panhandling monkey, yet nobody black or white came to her aid.

The reason Bush and other whites are not protected is you can’t protect up, only down.

Those more powerful than us don’t need our protection.  The top of the food chain doesn’t look for help from the less powerful.  Fighters don’t look to their cornermen to fight for them.  Fathers don’t look to their children to protect them.  The silverback gorilla doesn’t look to his mate to protect him.

When Jesus—arguably the #1 white guy in the world—is disparaged, the Left just calls it “art.” The Right leaves it up to God to handle His business.  What can we do for The Almighty?! And God does handle His business!

Last time I checked, ALL humans are only a rat’s hair from being chimpanzees anyway, not just black people. So why do black Liberals always seem to take it personally. I’m no chimp, and neither is anybody in my family. In fact, don’t protect me, because like whites, black Conservatives are at the top of the food chain, thus in need of no protection.

I call Liberals of all colors chimps (with apologies to chimps) daily, because generally Liberals act like chimps or worse. Liberal lunacy is entertaining, and the inspiration for Hollywood using chimpanzee as caricatures of people so often.

Is there an acceptable animal to call black people? We call each other “dawg.” How disparaging is that?

We say worse things like “What’s up my N*gga?” A term of endearment.

We have excited utterances like, “That’s my mutha-f—ker, right there!” when another person (color notwithstanding) says or does something we really like, and MF is considered a compliment in those circumstances. So I can see how white folks can get confused.

I am in no way condoning what Davenport did. It was juvenile humor to imply that Obama is hiding his birth certificate because he is from a family of chimpanzees, and Conservatives should be more clever than this in going after Obama.  He provides much more rich material almost daily.

The picture posted by Davenport might be in poor taste, but it’s not up to me to come to her aid.  She’s a big girl and she can handle the repercussions, and in fact her mea culpa has begun, as she has begun her apology tour. Next of course she will have to go through society-imposed racial sensitivity training.

It won’t matter what she does. She is now a racist, and a label more difficult to shake than that of a pedophile.  Her act will allow Liberals to demonize all Republicans over the next few months, as they pray to a pagan god that will allow for a few more Republican slip-ups between now and election time.

That’s my rant!

© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved