Does the Gay Agenda Trumpt the American Agenda?

I believe that Obama’s evolution with respect to gay issues is based on his sexual past. Big deal. Other than pop culture curiosity, I don’t think most conservatives care about Obama’s sexual past, present, or future. But we do care when the gay agenda supersedes the American agenda. I believe that a president’s singular agendum should be the betterment of the entire nation, not various segments.

I discuss my book The BIG Black Lie my discovery of “gay,” which was fairly benign. I was around 12 years old, and my grandfather had stopped to gas up, before we left Dallas. As my grandfather pumped gas, I saw what I thought to be at the time, “the prettiest man I had ever seen.” He was very well-dressed, but noticeably different from what I had been raised to think of a man. He was perfectly dressed in a tan jumpsuit, and he had a beret to match.  I remember he carried a matching clutch that looped around his neck and was tucked just below his armpit.

As a kid from the country, I had never seen such style in my life. I had to know what I was seeing, so I whispered for my grandmother to look at the man as he walked by. My grandmother took a stealthy glance, then whispered to me, “He’s funny.”

I had no idea what “funny” meant, but would learn over time. Until further revelations, I just knew that I wasn’t “funny.”

Over time, I altered my perception of what a man is. I would further learn of all the variations in how people form that make the idea of gender confusing at times. I developed compassion for people in these areas, and learned to respect the idea that the human body is a complicated creation, which the mind can complicate to unfathomable degrees.

Understanding that everybody doesn’t think as I do or act as I do, I learned not moralize on the conditions of others, to just let them be. I recognized that these “different” people I described were of all races, ethnicities, creeds, and so on.

As a youth, I thought it was mainly white people who are gay. To be (openly) gay in the black culture was almost unheard of, or so I was conditioned. Prior to my exposure to “pretty man,” I had only heard of black gays anecdotally, though I do recall having certain feelings or suspicions about some males and females I had met.

In early adulthood, I recognized a very different world from what black culture had taught me. Blacks were just as gay as whites; whites were just as poor as blacks, and so on. I learned that these nice neat boxes that the world kept trying to put people in just didn’t fit.

As I traveled, I found that there were all these same “different” people all over the world. I learned that transsexuals were treated much the same almost everywhere I went. Cross-dressers were gawked at almost universally. Being gay was discouraged again almost universally. I got it. To say that there wasn’t some pushback to being gay would be naïve.

Because of my worldview, I learned that all these people were part of the human condition. They were everywhere, in all cultures. We can argue the nature nurture theory; nevertheless I assure you that I know it to be a bit of both.

My point is, I evolved. All on my own. I didn’t need the government to evolve me.

I remember when I believed the only people who had tattoos were thugs or ex-cons. Nowadays, seeing somebody with a tattoo doesn’t necessarily carry the same connotation it did decades ago, at least not for me.  However, Obama would have passed legislation to protect people with tattoos, because he believes he can control your thoughts with laws.

Like blacks (and all people) the best thing that the LGBT has is their humanity, not special legislation that puts them in a box. All the rules that were imposed for blacks essentially removed black people from the human race.

Without creating books like, “Billy has two black parents,” black people managed to overcome all the adversity of slavery and the lack of civil rights.[1] The understanding of black culture didn’t come from books, it came from people realizing the contribution that blacks have made in this country and seeing it with their own eyes.

Who knows if some of history’s most famous blacks were gay or wished they were another gender.  If you told me that George Washington Carver had dressed in women’s clothes, it would not diminish his accomplishments to the world in the least. Nor do Carver’s accomplishments have more impact on America because he was black. Peanut butter is delicious, regardless of Carver’s sexuality, ethnicity, and any other proclivities he may have had.

You would think that we would have learned something by now about how to deal with people, and not attempt to legislate thought. Despite what people may believe, Civil Rights laws are not the reason Obama is president. Obama is president, because of the actions of people like Jesse Owens, Arthur Ashe, Jackie Robinson, and millions of other non-descript blacks who in their own small ways changed the hearts of minds of racists in America.

Because of these unheralded black Americans, America long ago abandoned focusing on color—save the racists who voted for Obama strictly because he was black. For the most part, the people who voted for Obama did so because they felt he was going to be a transformational figure in American politics, not gay politics or black politics.

There has been a lot of money spent on removing people from the human race, and putting them in boxes. Obama wants to do the same for the LGBT, because of his life experiences and his evolution. $17T has been spent on the evolution of “helping blacks,” and I don’t see a lot of progress at the Main Street level. How much money is America willing spend on LGBT agenda? How many more manuals and training sessions do we need for Americans to understand gays?

For the most part, Americans interact with people based on our needs and their performance. I choose my friends based on common core values, without moralizing about those who values don’t necessarily agree with mine. I don’t have to have gay friends in order to not be homophobic. I don’t need white friends to prove I’m not racist.

All men are created equal. It’s time Obama stop with the politicizing various agendas, and focus on the human agenda, the American agenda.

© Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved.

Kevin Jackson is an Amazon best-selling author and award-winning blogger. He also hosts a daily radio show.

Obama’s Whole Two Girlfriends,

Isn’t it a touch suspicious that we are just now hearing about Obama past girlfriends? A little late to be touting Obama prowess with the ladies, if you ask me. A desperate move by the Left to try to convince us that Barry Soetoro was the Barry White of his time.

And when we finally get the question answered of,  “Where are Obama’s girlfriends?” all they can come up with is two. Bill must have had a serious chuckle over this: “Two girls over a few years…Heck, that’s a typical night out for me!”

And both Obamas girlfriends were white. Now there’s the shocker! No wonder nobody wanted to divulge this little tidbit in 2008, when Obama was “all things black.” This might have gone over like a high-jumping elephant with “African-Americans for Obama” crowd back then.

It was said that during his college years, Barry struggled with his racial identity—I guess he didn’t realize he was human?

Obama’s first girlfriend Alex McNear was from an upper middle-class family and would later marry a Serbian boxer.[1] McNear wouldn’t elaborate on her relationship with the racial-confused-would-be-future-Commander-in-Grief.

The second girlfriend Genevieve Cook hailed from a prominent Australian family, she journaled her observations of her relationship with young Barack, as reported here:

In one entry, she wrote: “The sexual warmth is definitely there.” But just one month later, she wrote, “Barack still intrigues me, but so much going on beneath the surface, out of reach. Guarded, controlled.”

I’d say that Leftist America fell under the same spell as Ms. Cook, because they still know very little about guarded Barack. And like with Cook, when the Left told Barry, “I love you,” he responded, “Thank you.”

While we are on the subject of Barry’s past lovers, there is the nagging question, “Did the author question any of the boys?”

I know this is a controversial subject, but the rumors persist that though Barack dabble with girls, but he liked boys better…in the Biblical way.

It seems the Left not only wished to conceal Barry’s penchant for melanin-challenged women, but also his hunger for the heartier sex.

The Left is supposed to be tolerant. They wouldn’t care if Obama batted from both sides of the plate, would they? You would think that Obama would wear bi-sexuality like a badge of honor.

Perhaps he does?

He gave the LGBT lobby “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell,” and he continues to fight for “gay marriage.” Arne Duncan is over miseducation, and is openly and atrociously gay.

If it weren’t for those honery Conservative Democrat Negroes. They are less tolerant when it comes to gay issues. And I will bet you dollars to dog turds, that if Obama had admitted to having gay relationships with men, he would never have been elected president. Further, if he admitted to it now, he would be chased out of DC by those not-so-tolerant black Democrats.

The LGBT crowd knows this.  This is why they don’t make a stink about Obama not admitting to his bi-sexuality. Just knowing is good enough for them.

Obama has built-in excuses, should he want to fess up.

It is well-documented that Obama was mentored by sexual deviant, Frank Marshall Davis. Davis wrote  Sex Rebel: Black (Memoirs of a Gourmet Gash), a under the pseudonym Bob Greene. In the book he detailed his sexual encounters with a 13-year old girl. Davis also penned an unpublished novel titled, Mixed Sex Salad, a novel which has led many to speculate on exactly what type of relationship Davis had with young Barry.

But Little Barry was exposed to strange sexuality even before being handed over to Marshall. In what we learned only a few months back, in Indonesia, Obama was raised by Tranny Nanny, a transsexual, prostitute nanny. It was reported that as a child, Obama used to watch Tranny Nanny put on his mother’s make-up. That’s sure to jack a kid up.

So it is NOT a stretch to believe that at some point Obama might “experiment.”

Why wouldn’t Obama just admit to what is not that difficult to prove? In just basic research one can find evidence of Obama’s sexual proclivities in Chicago. Rahm Emanuel and the bath houses and there is Obama’s former “confidant,” Reggie Love.

I suspect that Obama believes this book will help mitigate the rumors of his bi-sexuality, which only makes me wonder if there is more to come on this issue. There must be something amiss, since Obama is willing to potentially forfeit his race card. Is it more important to hide his sexual nature versus divulging his past love of the other white meat.

Obama must be willing to take his changes, given that he changed his evil ways and married Michelle, an authentically militant black woman.

Regardless of the marriage to MO, don’t be surprised if you hear about Obama’s boyfriends are releasing their Love Letters…in a 40 volume set!

That’s my rant!

© 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

If the Mitt fits, you must acquit

The lamestream media is already carpet-bombing Mitt Romney. They would love to set the meme on Romney and suppress the Tea Party vote. As my grandfather would say, “Careful is the man who hurdles barbed-wire fences naked.”

The Left has nothing.

“Romney is rich,” they remind us, as if wealth is a bad thing. They say that Romney is “not Reagan,” like McCain was; or better yet as if Obama is. Even Obama himself channeled the ghost of Reagan in order to convince us that our rich white Republican is the wrong choice.

Romney is all that is standing between the Liberal apparatus and their destruction of the American way of life.  The media knows that Romney, aka “other” can and will beat the Left’s golden child.

If you believe the Left, however you might be thinking, “Given Obama’s popularity; how could he possibly lose?” Take a look at the lamestream polling data:

Poll 1: If you remove all 42 other presidents, Barack Obama is the most popular president ever.

Poll 2: I was less surprised to learn that Barack Obama is considered the best black president in history, though it was a close call between him and Bill Clinton.

The point is, it’s easy to see why Obama will be difficult to beat. {wink}

As a black man, I’m actually sad that Obama is such an abject failure that he will be a one-term president. I can’t stand Democrats for the most part, nevertheless if Obama had “represented,” I might have warmed to him.  This is because, like most blacks I have a sense of nostalgia for blacks who break the color barrier. Until Obama, when blacks are “firsts,” they are awesome.

Jack Johnson, the first black heavyweight boxing champ changed the sport of boxing and he changed the world. Not only did Johnson legally beat up white men, he added what was then insult to injury by dating white women and actually married one. Can you imagine the male genitalia[1] this man had to possess in that day and time to stick his finger in the eye of convention?[2] Jack Johnson was the poster child for “Trendsetter”, and should be the patron saint of interracial dating and marriage, if there ever was one.

And there are many other examples of black “first” greats, like Arthur Ashe, Wilma Rudolph, Jackie Robinson, and so on. Obama however is unquestionably the worst black “first.” This is bad news for the Left, because despite their delusions of a second term, Obama has the office closest to the door. His admin has already boxed up his goodies for shipment with pre-paid postage to Kenya. Obama will follow shortly in Winter, returning one Kenyan village its idiot.

How will Leftist America handle the departure of their messiah? They would lose their religion, if they had any, go stone crazy.  If you think the election of an unqualified black man was historical, just wait until you see how historical it is to unelect one.

When Obama loses, black Liberals will cry racism, and claim that America has reverted to being racist—this will be the definition of the pot calling the kettle black.  Black Liberals are undoubtedly the most racist people in America today. Their universe revolves around color, specifically black. “Rape us, rob us, shoot us, kill us, rip us off, just be BLACK!”

The black race pimps know that Obama is the worst president in history, but he’s black. That and being Democrat is all it takes to get the support of other blacks. Anybody who doesn’t feel this way is either a racist or a sellout, so say the black pimps and their minions.

The Left wants Conservatives to feel damned if we do, damned if we don’t in picking Romney. They think they have the power to determine who Romney is, not us. They really believe that Romney is Obama’s opponent, because the Left doesn’t understand the reality of their plight.

They don’t want to face the fact that Obama’s biggest opponent is himself. Obama created another opponent, “ABOA,” as in “Anybody But Obama Again.” Finally, there is Mitt Romney.

If Conservatives set the agenda and support Romney as I predict they will, then on Nov 6, 2012 black Liberals and others on the Left will feel like white folks did at hearing the OJ verdict.

To paraphrase the late Johnny Cochran, “If the Mitt fits, you must acquit!”

That’s my rant!

© 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Kevin Jackson is a National Spokesman for TheTeaParty.net, an Amazon best-selling author, and blogger.

[2] Not to mention what else he was sticking in forbidden places!

Chins are the new Breasts but Why I Opted for Big Naughty Bits?

Claimer:  This is completely satirical. Enjoy without judgement.

According to this report in Fox News, chins are the new breasts, as chin implants are up 71 percent over last year. I’m distraught. I have never looked at a woman’s chin and thought, “Wow! Look at the chin on that babe!”

Remember when all the rage in Hollywood was white starlets wanting Angelina Jolie lips?! They created these hideous lips, and lots of women got them, and that perpetual pucker. Hollywood essentially used Angelina Jolie to sell white women on getting black women’s lips. Let’s face it, with black chick lips, Angelina Jolie is a stone cold hottie about to marry Brad Pitt. Without those lips Angelina Jolie is a pretty white chick dating Bubba Pitt. It’s hard to believe that such a subtle change in one’s DNA can be the diff between Brad and Bubba, but such is the case.

The same is true for butts. Remember when women in Hollywood were all getting their butts done?  Who do we thank for the butt craze?  Kim Kardashian? Perhaps. But before her it was Jennifer Lopez, who gained butt fame from Selena, the Mexican singer who was killed by her assistant. All this hoopla over a few chicks who have a black woman’s butt. Why hasn’t anybody notified the UN that black women are being pilfered.

Nothing new when it comes to chicks wanting to be black. Remember when well-tanned Bo Derek rocked the braids in the movie “10”? There she was, running on the beach. Bo Derek’s braids and big chin bouncing up and down in that slow motion shot, as Dudley Moore looked longingly on, wishing he could put his pianist’s fingers on Bo’s beautiful facebump.

The article says of chins,

“As a result, people subconsciously associate a stronger chin with more authority, self-confidence and trustworthiness.”

Is this not even more true of big naughty bits?

I hate that body parts fads are a moving target, since years ago[1] I invested in my big naughty bits. I figured by now that big naughty bits would be in.  I wanted a body part that said, “manly” without begin overly ostentatious. Despite my humility, a few people do recognize my big naughty bits, and some write and tell me so.

One wrote, “Kevin, to do what you do, you must have big [ones].”  Another went further, opining, “I bet you have [naughty bits] the size of Alaska!”

It’s like these people looked at my medical file or overheard my consult with my doctor. When I asked for my big naughty bits, I requested “naughty bits the size of Texas.” However, my doctor talked me specifically into getting naughty bits, and I quote…the size of Alaska! Hallelujah Sarah Palin!

As I think on this, I should have picked a body part that could be exposed without offending. Not to mention women who like men with big naughty bits would have known that I was the man for them, as many women love men with big naughty bits. On the contrary, women don’t necessarily like to see other women with big naughty bits.  And despite the freedom of the women’s movement, most women don’t want people to know that they have had the surgery[2].

We all know women like Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and many other Liberal women—I call them “Tuckers” [3]—have opted for surgically enhanced male naughty bits. These are in short supply in men on their side of the aisle. These women obscure their big naughty bits, post-surgery; however occasionally you can spot them when they wear the wrong outfit or pants that are a wee bit too tight.

I know what you’re thinking and yes, big naughty bits can be cumbersome and are risky.  But all surgeries have complications, so I knew the risks. We all have to die of something. And upon my death I wanted the medical examiner to be impressed.[4]

I know I will shrivel up in my old age, and my big naughty bits will be a bit awkward, but no more so than breasts. Have you seen pictures of septuagenarians who have had breast enhancements in their 40s? Their bodies look like saddle bags with two lumps. And in a decade or two, you will readily know those women who had their butts done; trust me on this, it won’t be sexy in the future.  And anybody with fake lips will look like the spawn of Carol Channing and a Big Mouth Bass.

The article goes on to say that a more prominent chin is what people want; that a certain chin invokes a winning look. How about the chin that looks like a butt; or worse? The face tends to shrink up a bit as we age, so I caution people against a deep dimple or they could look like they got big naughty bits, only they got them on their chins.

Regardless, I can hardly wait for Hollywood to tell us what next to do with our bodies. Until then, keep your chin up and your tummy tucked.

That’s my rant!

(c) 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Kevin Jackson is a best-selling author and blogger.

[2] Except some trannies

[3] Among other things!

[4] Doubly impressed, if you get my meaning

Is Romney the new Reagan

Obama says that Reagan couldn’t pass muster with Republicans of today. A Hillbilly knows more about opera than Obama knows about Reagan. Obama does know a little something about Republicans though. He knows that historically Republicans fight like sissies and have no idea how to set a narrative. So in attacking Reagan, Obama believes Republicans won’t know how to react. They certainly wouldn’t let just anybody take the baton from Reagan, now would they?

Further, Obama wants America to believe that he and Reagan are brothers from other mothers; that he is more like Reagan than Romney. Nice narrative, if you can sell it. Reagan might be rolling over in his grave at Republicans, but not because Republicans are not Reaganesque at their core. Reagan would be appalled at how the Left has managed to commandeer the lexicon, and make sensible people lose their ability to reason. Like with tax cuts.

The Left continually derides “The Bush Tax Cuts,” as if tax cuts are bad. Tax cuts give the people their money back. How can that possibly be bad? This is the equivalent at not liking a rebate. We all love rebates. I doubt that you’ve ever heard anybody complain about getting a rebate unless you have to send in the UPC code and a copy of the receipt.

Obama wants us to believe that we want the government to “invest” in things like Solyndra, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Postal Service, Medicare and Medicaid, and frankly that’s insulting. So when the government confiscates less of your money, that’s cause for celebration, not derision.

Liberals however have managed to make tax cuts something Republicans are ashamed of. Even former President George W. Bush said recently that he wished Liberals had named “The Bush Tax Cuts” something else.  Bush should be proud to have his name on tax cuts.  Would Bush rather have his name on “The Bush Tax HIKES?”

Can you imagine how Reagan would have fought on behalf of “The Reagan Tax Cuts?” Reagan would be shoving tax cuts up Obama’s “Democrat mascot,” and wear those brown-stained tax cuts like a badges of honor.

By now, we would have a civilian medal called “The Reagan Medal of Freedom for Tax Cuts”—a medal that would be second only to the Medal of Honor. Republicans lucky enough to receive the medal would proudly showcase their medals in their campaign ads. Reagan would remind the American people that the government is a beggar, at the mercy of the people; that the government has no money, because the money belongs to the people.

Just as the Left has made giving your money back appear bad, so they attempt to set the narrative on Romney. They don’t want you to know that Romney has Reagan potential, at times appears downright Reaganesque.

There is very little difference between Reagan’s state of California and Massachusetts.  Reagan governed The People’s Republic of California at a time when the state had sanity. If he governed California now, I suspect he would have governed much like Romney.

Reagan would applaud Romney on his life, particularly Romney’s ability to amass an astounding net worth, as there is NO shame in doing well financially. Yet Liberals want America to believe Romney is bad for acquiring wealth, and Republicans continually apologize for financial success, as if people love their personal failure. How silly is this!? Some liberals people may love other people’s failures, but most Americans wish for personal success.

Presenting Romney as a success is the Left trying to convince us that successful people like Romney are losers. Romney has too much against him? He’s a wealthy family man with political experience and amazing business acumen. What a loser! Too bad Romney doesn’t have enough radical influences; he’s not a closet homosexual whose religion is in question, because that would make him even more interesting to the Left.

Nope, Romney is a pure by-the-book capitalist.  And much to the chagrin of the Left, Romney will work to repeal ObamaCare. He will also reduce corporate taxes, and do things that encourage small business. Romney will bring fiscal sanity to Obama insane Bizarro World of economics where a bankrupt nation can spend its way out of debt, where lower bond ratings are dismissed, as are welfare rolls bursting at the seam.

There certainly is no better time than now for the baton passing ceremony between the ghost of Reagan and Mitt Romney. It’s 1980 all over again, and Romney deserves the baton. Remember this:  It’s not what you think about Romney, it is what we make of Romney. Liberals will have much to fear, when we begin to see Reagan in Romney.

That’s my rant!

(c) 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Kevin Jackson is the National Spokesperson for TheTeaParty.net, an Amazon best-selling author and blogger.

WASHINGTON,

If Obama were a basketball player, he would be the equivalent of the guy who can’t inbound the ball or who constantly double-dribbles. He’s the guy to whom you just quit passing the ball, because when he gets it, he always shoots and always misses.

What happened to black pride? There was a time when black people didn’t settle for failures like Obama; they expected more from blacks who were blessed to get the opportunity for greatness. Whether it was sports, entertainment, or politics, blacks who were set up for something transcendental carried the expectation of the entire black race on their shoulders. Much was riding on his or her success, regardless of the role.

Each time the baton was passed, the next black understood the obligation to represent, to show the world that the black man had a contribution to make, and we would not squander it. We were to be among the best, and expected to be better than whites at whatever we wanted to succeed. Many blacks received the admonition that, if you were to do a job that put you in the spotlight, do it “twice as good as a white person.”

Read the rest at the Washington Post here…

Liberals Love the Hoodie

I knew it wouldn’t take Obama long to see how to make the shooting of Trayvon Martin in FL a political talking point. “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.” Is that supposed to make the death of Trayvon much more tragic?

Forget that the killing of a teenager in FL by a neighborhood watch buffoon is a tragedy, one of the many routine tragedies that shouldn’t occur in America. No, Trayvon’s death is a crisis of political proportions.

The media started the feeding frenzy, alerting Obama that the situation could be “racial,” reporting the story as: White Man Shoots Black Teen.

As it turns out the “white” man who shot the kid was actually half-white and half-Hispanic man. Funny how the media considers a half-white half-Hispanic man white, but a half-white half-black president black. Since Hispanics are technically “Caucasians,” it’s only a slight stretch. Journalistic integrity intact.

The incident was much worse however, because the teen was wearing a hoodie, making this for the Left a clear case of racial profiling.

Hoodie or no hoodie, the kid should not have been shot by Zimmerman, as neighborhood watch is not neighborhood shoot.  Zimmerman took his role way too seriously, and a tragedy resulted. But is it a national tragedy?

As for Zimmerman confronting the kid however, that is another story.

An [insert ethnicity here] teenager wearing a hoodie in Florida—where it’s HOT—is reason for a neighborhood watchman to “observe and report.”  There were two clues: (1) A teenager was walking, and (2) wearing hoodie. Let’s face it; the hoodie is the uniform of the thug, though it didn’t start out that way.

The inventor of the hoodie did so with the idea that when people wear sweat gear, their heads and ears get cold at times, depending on the clime. Being the industrious type that they are, criminals “criminalized” the hoodie, and made it part of their stable of uniforms, much like criminals co-opted Zorro’s mask, doctors’ spit guard, and women’s stockings.

So for Zimmerman to take notice of a teenager wearing a hoodie as part of what he believed to be his responsibilities for neighborhood watch was the right move. He went too far in what happened next however, and for that he should be arrested, tried, and given his penalty. That should be the end of it, except that Obama needs an election issue.

Obama has already hinted at the racial implications of this incident. Obama will prove that despite America having a black president, America is still “profiling.” The New Black Panther Party has issued a fatwa on George Zimmerman, offering $10,000 for his “capture.”

Is a black teenage walking in a hoodie suspicious? I’d like VP Joe Biden’s opinion to check with all the Indians working as cashiers at 7-Elevens or Dunkin Donuts. I suspect that no matter the nationality of a cashier, they have a far different view of people wearing hoodies than the Left is trying to portray.

Leftist blacks ask if white people can be profiled. Sure they can and I have a few profiles for them.

White people driving their cars in “black neighborhoods” are Crackers criminals buying crack, or some other drug of choice.

Here’s another profile.  Scantily clad white women standing on street corners in black neighborhoods are Cracker criminals committing prostitution, likely to feed their drug habits…oh, and their black pimps.

Make no mistake about it; I’m mad at the killing of the teen in Florida who happens to be black. I’m mad for his death, and I pray for his family. But I’m also mad because black teens are criminal standouts for the reasons most people are too afraid to say—black teens commit lots of crime, disproportionately to their other ethnic peers. And those wearing hoodies are exponentially more likely to commit crimes.

This is why the Liberals will make hay with situation, even though in this particular case, the kid’s ethnicity likely had little, if anything to do with his death. If Trayvon Martin had been wearing Tommy Hilfiger, things could have been different. God-forbid it’s the hoodie that causes people to take pause, and not the color of one’s skin.

Don’t expect the Left to impugn the hoodie; the hoodie is the uniform of the criminal.  The Left protects such symbols, because the Left must protect those who wish to do us harm to prove their tolerance. Why not make the hoodie our new flag, at least that way the Left won’t desecrate it?

But the Left won’t stop there, because we also need gun control. No gun, no incident. Stupid GUN!

Finally, all the neighborhood watch personnel should go through race and hoodie sensitivity training. This training must be performed by a Liberal lobbyist’s company and paid for by the taxpayers in order to be valid. Such are the consequences by the Left, when an overzealous neighborhood watchman makes one tragic mistake.

That’s my rant!

© Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

The Democrats’ Conundrum

As the election of 2012 approaches the Left becomes more desperate.  For the first time in his adult life Obama has to deal with the reality that he’s Barack Obama. And being Barack Obama has created a real conundrum for the Democrats.

Obama wanted to play president, not be president. And the real Barack Obama is anything but a confident competent winner.

Those who did not support Obama tried to sound the warning bell about Obama severe lack of well, everything. Obama lacked experience, and continues to lack character, integrity, and a love of the America that has taken over 200 years to build.

Now Democrats must face the reality of their creation, just like I did when I found out that Fonzi is not the cool Italian of Happy Days, but instead is a whiny Jewish guy named Winkler. Obama v2.0 doesn’t just reveal his vulnerabilities; he exposes the abject lunacy of the Left.

The scary thing for Democrats is they went all in on Obama. They spent so much time propping up their puppet, believing that style would prevail over substance. But Obama failed miserably, and the Democrats have no succession planning.

Hillary can’t run this election unless they abandon the “not so golden boy.”  I suspect that Hillary is smart enough not to want to run this election anyway, unless she has a defense to combat Obama and the Democrats’ scorched earth project.

The sad truth is that Hillary has two chances for a run in 2016: Slim and none.  Despite all the tolerance that Democrats supposedly have, they will not elect an old “rode hard put up wet” white woman to the presidency.  Don’t believe me; it already happened…in 2008.

Recall that Hillary was all the buzz in 2008, that is until the Democrats found an “articulate and clean” candidate with “no Negro dialect.” The Democrats dated Hillary, until they found somebody they deemed cuter.

Obama was perfect for the rebirth of radical Regressivism, sure to continue punishing minorities.

“We will have them n*ggers voting Democrats for 200 years!” – LBJ – Democrat ICON

But the strategy backfired, because Obama was supposed to be at the very least “ok.” Obama is ok, if you like that America is now fighting for Third World status.

The walls surrounding Obama are crumbling from within. Right-wing conspirers need not apply and the Republican machine has been switched off.  It’s the Democrats who are destroying Obama, which is one reason why the Obama administration is panicked.

Who leaked the recent story that Barack Obama was raised by a gay, transsexual, prostitute nanny, affectionately called “Tranny Nanny” by the media? Republicans didn’t have a clue or they would have brought up Tranny Nanny in 2008.

And if that’s not bad enough for Obama, the media, repeat the MEDIA ran with the story.  It appears that in 2012, the media loves a salacious story about Obama’s past, more than they love Obama. The idea that Obama might be just a bit mixed up in the cabeza has been allowed to float in “the cloud.” God-forbid we actually get to see Obama’s grades or a new and improved birth certificate?

A recent poll has Obama dropping by 12 points with women; repeat, WOMEN! The same women who wanted to take Obama home to daddy—“HE’S HALF WHITE TOO DADDY”—are now abandoning Obama like last year’s fashions.

It doesn’t take a psychic to see the future for Obama. He sees it, and you can bet he’s throwing hissy fits all over the White House, as he contemplates updating his resume.  Obama is so desperate to keep his position[1] that he recently made a Truth Team declaration, saying that he has drilled for more oil than any other president. Obama wants America to believe that he is the Fossil Fuel President.

Forget that Obama has said publicly that he wants to destroy the coal industry. He publicly battles with “Big Oil” dirty revenue, and wouldn’t allow the Keystone Pipeline to happen or allow drilling on Federal land; but he’s now the Fossil Fuel president.

Meanwhile back at the algae farm, Obama discussed removing oil company subsidies, as he doubled down on failed green energy failures, boondoggles, and payola to same.

Instead of forming African-Americans for Obama, Obama should have formed: “White People Please Give Me One More Chance?”

Obama is reneging on his declaration that if he didn’t have things on track in three years, he should be a one-term president. For the good of the country. No sane people expected an incompetent megalomaniac to really live up to that declaration, now did we?

Two things have saved Obama to date:  The media and Obama’s “blackness.” Had it not been for either, Obama’s choices would have been impeachment or resignation. Wait, there is a third choice…Jail.

America has become so politically correct that despite the president being “black,” he can still run on the “I’m a victim of racism” ticket. But that’s changing and its vexes the Left.

The black president has been in charge, and America is worse off; we are all victims of Obama. Obama owns whatever America has become, because leaders must take credit or blame, regardless of the circumstances. Obama can’t admit he is not a leader over the worst America in decades. That is the Democrats’ conundrum.

© 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

Liberals Should Thank Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh is a Conservative god, but he doesn’t speak for all Conservatives despite what the lamestream media and others on the Left want people to believe. And occasionally Limbaugh makes a mistake.

We can all admit that Limbaugh’s comment about Sandra Fluke being a slut was crass. Regardless of the moral implications of Fluke’s testimony before Congress about contraception and wanting her college to provide free contraceptives, the fact is that Fluke can have all the free sex she wants.  That really is her choice.

If Fluke wants to have sex for money, then Fluke’s choice is diminished somewhat by a bunch of mainly white men known as our “government.” The government mandates that if Fluke wants to get paid to have sex, her choices are as follows:

(1) Risk getting arrested for choosing to charge for sex, or

(2) Move to a location where the government authorizes sex for money, so that the government will regulate and tax her vagina and other bodily orifices she may use in providing said paid sexual services.

Apparently the NOW movement still has a bit of work to do when it comes to paid sex. Free sex however has few restrictions. NOW has earned Fluke the right to be as promiscuous as her vagina and lesser attributes will allow, and with no moral implications.

Who are non-governmental mere mortal men to moralize unattainable sexual standards on women?  These men should leave women who wish to waddle in the wasteland of no holds barred, no harm no foul sex with anybody and everybody.  The new mantra of freedom for sexual pleasure is now “all a PERSON needs for sex is a location.”

Meddling Conservative men really must hate women, when you think about it. Conservative men feign idolatry of a woman’s virtue, all in an effort to actually demonize women; to strip them of their rights to be as sex-craved as men.

This is why Liberals should embrace Limbaugh.  Limbaugh divulged the Conservative man’s ugly secret of wanting to put woman on a pedestal. How deviant.

Limbaugh’s comment had the added affect of overshadowing the point that Fluke was making, which is one way or another Liberal women want to be paid to have sex one way or another.

Fluke didn’t argue to help coed men to get $1K annually for condoms. Think of the problem the lack of money, ergo condoms has created in the black community. Many young black simply do not buy condoms, as they are cost-prohibitive.  And there is no shortage of young black women who seem ready to allow young black men to profiteer on the Women’s Movement, and thus are willing to accommodate these economically depressed young studs.

In one case a young black man fathered 23 children by 14 different women. This guy should get a Nobel “Piece” Prize, if you ask me, but he would have many challengers and the record is in danger of being broken soon.

And this problem is not just within the black community, nor is it limited to the U.S. The U.K Examiner reported on this white British deadbeat who faked his death in order to avoid paying child support on his 8 children by multiple mothers.  He had another little one on the way…by another mother.

Fluke did not argue for coed men to get vasectomies so God-forbid, men are not burdened with babies. Has Fluke even considered how much money a baby costs a man in child-support, and sometimes spousal support, even when the man may not be the father of the child, or the fact that woman doesn’t have to be a spouse?

And once a man has finished sowing his oats, who pays for the reverse vasectomy? The man? What kind of Amazonian world do we live in, where men are emasculated and forced to do all the bidding of women and then pay for the privilege?!

The NOW generation has given the women of today freedom to choose, and women are picking deadbeats by the dozen all over the world. Thankfully here in America, the taxpayer remains vigilant to pick up the pieces, regardless of the woman’s and deadbeat man’s choices.

Why shouldn’t the Women’s Movement go full circle and require that we prevent them from having the burden of children with a knuckledragging Neanderthal who was just all about the sex?  It’s our civic duty.

The pill can do what no parent can. The pill doesn’t moralize when a  young woman decides to have sex with a miscreant. Statistically speaking, if you have sex with enough bad boys, you will ultimately end up with Mr. Right, right?

Limbaugh was wrong to treat women as sacrosanct. Women are humans. Women can do what they want, just like men. Ladies on the other hand respect their virtue and don’t put their business in the streets, nor do they expect a man to pay for it.

That’s my rant!

© 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved

A

Does anybody else see the correlation between Obama speaking for a product and that product failing miserably shortly thereafter? And they say this guy gives good speeches. Solyndra, Evergreen Solar, SpectraWatt, the list of failures touted by Obama goes on and on and on. Midas was to gold, as Obama is to red ink.

When Obama visits a factory, it becomes a “failure factory,” doomed to the scrap heap of defunct businesses. Obama is such a bad luck Schleprock, that if Obama were to warn the CEO of a company of his visit, I recommend that the CEO have all  employees stay home, and put a sign on the lobby door that reads,

“Factory Being Remodeled Until Nov 6, 2012…unless there is no GOD and we have to close for an additional four years!”

Sometimes, however it doesn’t even take a visit from Obama, and all Obama has to do is mention a company by name to doom it. Obama’s State of the Union addresses or stump speeches have corporation marketing executives and shareholders shaking in their capitalist boots.

Companies are realizing that when Obama helps, it hurts. And getting “stimulus” from Obama is like possessing the Hope diamond, where nothing comes of it but despair.

GM is finding this out the hard way.

Three days after Obama touted that he would get a Volt after his second term ends, GM temporarily {ahem} halted production and laid off 1300 workers.

Obama declared that he will get a Volt in 5 years, which only confirmed that the White House drug use policy is not being enforced and Obama is straight up delusional. Obviously Obama will be getting a used Volt, because the new Volt has been struck by a lightning “volt” as it were.

Obama went on to say to the fawning UAW crowd,

[pp] “I sat in a Volt, but the Secret Service wouldn’t let me him drive it.”

There you have it—the Secret Service saving lives, protecting America from Obama. Because who knows where that Volt would have ended up.  In a ditch? Over a cliff? Or perhaps Obama would run over American taxpayers with a goofy look on his face that he had when he took his daughters to ride bumper cars?

Obama supposedly can do anything in the world he wants as he is the leader of the free world. However apparently there is a Secret Service has a directive to not allow Obama to drive anything, as Obama and cars just don’t mix. Neither does Obama and business.

GM “temporarily” halting production of the Volt is like Rick Perry or Herman Cain “suspending” their campaigns. One can only surmise that GM is colluding with DOJ on how to force Americans to buy the Volt, because they only sold 603 in January. Prospects to sell more are as dismal as the real unemployment numbers.

This is because the only way to sell the Volt is by force, by mandate, dare I say by Executive Order. The Volt is a disaster, and represents Obama to a tee—An overpriced, under-performer, soon to be out of production in 2012.

The fact that GM halted production on the heels of the Obama speech is symbolic to the Obama administration. The demise of the Volt proves that the government shouldn’t be in the business of picking winners and losers.

If we are keeping it real, politicians don’t pick winners; they only pick losers.  It is Liberal politicians (on both sides) who don’t believe in the free market, which is why Liberals pick losers.

Liberals love losers, because Liberals are losers. Liberals love experimenting on losers, as if loser DNA will somehow create winners. Liberals are searching for a taxpayer-funded cure for themselves, and the research just keeps backfiring.

Obama has financed all these boondoggles in a spending orgy, because he hopes that it will make him a winner. Obama is the Hillbilly lotto winner turned big baller at the gentleman’s club who actually believes the women love him and not his money. He is destined to be back in the poor house within a few short years.

Obama and the Volt deserve each other, and America should provide Obama a Volt as part of his severance package later this year. We should take the necessary step to provide him another ten of those boat anchors, so he has enough spare parts.

Deus No Volt (God doesn’t want it)

That’s my rant!

© 2012 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved