Click here to secure your copy of the 2nd edition of "The BIG Black Lie!"
Close

Not a member yet? Register now and get started.

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

 //  Jobs Bill and Baby Steps

Posted on Wednesday, February 24th, 2010 by Kevin Jackson

Lost in the white noise of recent Democrat loses and other setbacks is the fact that Democrats are the dominant party.  The new $15B jobs plan reinforces that Liberal Democrats will take whatever they want, and Republicans are helpless to stop them.  When the tactic of force doesn’t work, Democrats resort to their tried and true tactic of…“baby steps.”

Democrats would love to blame the present condition of the economy and a host of other things on the notion that they can’t prevent the filibuster. But let’s not forget that the Democrats hold 59 Senate seats to the Republicans 41!

The fact that Democrats are belly-aching about not having a super majority is incredulous when you think about it rationally.  Democrats control both houses of Congress with overwhelming majorities, yet they complain, “My Ferrari uses too much gas!”

The change in the Democrats’ strategy was not because of the MA seat going Republican, but because America became aware of just how crazy Obama’s ideas are.  Most Democrats are happier than a hippy who made it through customs that Obama was unable to pass things like card check, Cap and Tax, and DeathCare, and the polls prove that.  Had it not been for Republicans blocking these ridiculous ideas, America would be 88% union, paying 3X for its energy, and own DeathCare policies, but waiting on the five year delay for the policies to take effect.

The so-called mandate was not a mandate at all.  Those warm fuzzy feelings for Obama in 2008 are now seen as just indigestion in 2010.  And it was Obama’s policies that have forced the Democrats to pump the brakes, i.e. shift tactics. Baby steps.

Most big government programs began as little acorns, pardon the obvious pun. Social security began with baby steps, and is now a one-ton sacred cow.  The income tax system started with baby steps, “…to pay for the war,” and today the income tax system is a behemoth that nobody can understand.

Has the government ever rescinded any tax?  Gasoline taxes were added to finance one project or another, yet long after the projects have ended, the taxes still haunts us.  The government has become a bloated self-indulgent monster, and it got that way because it took baby steps, hardly noticed by the proletariat.

The Republicans who voted for the small—incremental is a better word—“jobs plan” are really showcasing their ignorance of history.

Consider that Democrats were able to regain their power after Reconstruction, practically erasing their vile history of racism.  They then transferred their legacy of racism to the party who actually freed the slaves and fought with valor for civil rights for blacks—the Republicans! Now that is something on which to marvel, and the Democrats did this over a period of a few decades…taking baby steps.

In 1922 Republicans held the majority in the Senate[i].  This was when Republicans were still getting the black vote and battling for the civil rights of black people. Republicans held their own until 1930[ii], where they led the Dems in the Senate 48 to 47. 

In 1932 Democrats held 59 seats, Republicans having lost 12 Senate seats[iii]. The election of 1934 brought the Democrats 9 additional seats and one Progressive seat, giving the Democrats 70 seats![iv]

When you consider the racist Progressive agenda that FDR implemented at that time, it is amazing that Republicans were able to get anything done during this time, and even easier to see how the “Progressive” baby steps began. 

Believe it or not, it got worse for Republicans. In 1936 the Demo-Progressives controlled a whopping 77 Senate seats, and Republicans only held 16![v]

The tide turned in 1937 due to the recession, as The New Deal was seen for what it was…The Raw Deal.  Republicans gained 7 seats back during this period.[vi] 

Republicans continued to gain with each election, until in 1946, they regained the majority in the Senate.[vii] 

Things flipped back and forth for a while, until the 86th Congress of 1958, where the Democrats gained 16 seats, giving them a 65-35 majority.[viii] Then Senate majority leader LBJ added to the baby steps begun by Democrat icon and fellow racist FDR in The Raw Deal

LBJ recognized what Republicans were doing for blacks—fighting for civil rights for blacks—and he knew the potential devastation the black vote could have on the Democrat’s plan to “keep the brotha down,” in the long run.  In his own words, LBJ could not let those “uppity Negros”[ix] get too much, so he devised a scheme to “…keep them N*ggers voting Democrat for the next 200 years.”[x] 

Under LBJ, The Raw Deal morphed into The Great Society, which would eventually become The InGrate Society of today.  Blacks bought into this fallacy hook, line, and sinker.

At the time of The InGrate Society, Democrats continued to gain seats in the Senate and the Democrats implemented the scheme to take over the mantle of being the party of civil rights.  LBJ’s plan on how to do this was simple:  Whatever Republicans say, just call them racists!  To paraphrase Alinsky, “If something is said often enough, people will eventually believe it.”

That is how the Republicans lost the distinction of being the party of civil rights, the party who freed the slaves, started the NAACP, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, sponsored all civil rights legislation, and began affirmative action, and how racist Democrats became the saviors of black people! A few decades of baby steps.

Here’s the wrap:

Just like Democrats have transferred their racist legacy to the Republicans and have taken control of the government with baby steps, they will transfer blame for Obama’s failed policies to the Republicans in the same way.

Like its predecessor, this new stimulus, guised as a jobs plan won’t work.  It doesn’t address critical issues in the economy that will affect jobs.  And frankly it’s not meant to work. It’s little more than another socialist money grab.

Before you even know it, $15B will become $50B will become $500B, and the money will go to unions, and other agencies that support the Democrat agenda, and it will happened right under our noses…with baby steps.

© 2010 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

Kevin Jackson is author of the Amazon best-selling book The BIG Black Lie, is a regular on The Glenn Beck Show, and appears every Thursday on Allman in the Morning, 97.1 FM radio.


[i] http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/reference/two_column_table/stats_and_lists.htm

[ii] ibid

[iii] ibid

[iv] ibid

[v] ibid

[vi] ibid

[vii] ibid

[viii] ibid

[ix] Quote by LBJ as Senate Majority Leader in 1957 documented in his archives

[x] Inside the White House by Ron Kessler – http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0671879197/ref=ase_conservativebo00/002-8280347-1084027

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

45 Comments »

 

proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 2:52 pm

why do you care so much about the republican party, kevin? i thought you were a conservative. why do you conflate the two whenever you make this argument?

the question isn’t whether or not the republican party made certain political decisions historically that converged with the agendas of black folk. the question is, in what ways do the values and goals of conservatism, which, by definition resists progressive change, jibe with radically progressive political measures like abolition, the XIII, VIV, and XV amendments, civil rights legislation, or the civil rights movement? there was nothing conservative about thaddeus stevens or charles sumner. just as there was nothing progressive about strom thurmond or jesse helms.

are you a conservative or a republican party apologist?


proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 2:55 pm

that’s supposed to say “the XIII, XIV, and XV amendments.”


mt says:
February 24, 2010 at 3:07 pm

Spot on Kevin. Sad that LBJ’s prediction has already made it a quarter of the way. Revisionism will never help us escape the fact that EVERY man, woman, and child has, in effect, a mortgage of 300,00K (without the crib!) nor will finger pointing help when social security checks, medicare coverage, etc. fail to be honored due to too much “incremental” debt. Sadly Kevin, we will be forced to learn the literal meaning of “baby steps” WHEN this happens.


Jim Schurmann says:
February 24, 2010 at 3:39 pm

Great rant Kevin! “Little acorns” thats funny.
You should post more rants it looks like Puddin is so envious of you and has so much hatred in his/her heart that she/he anxiously waits by the computer waiting for you to post a new one.
Now there are three sure things in life:Death,Taxes and Puddin jumping on every rant you post:).
Keep up the good work.Peace and love Puddin.


Kevin Jackson says:
February 24, 2010 at 4:24 pm

@proudhon – You can say that Progressives are progressive, however it is far from the truth! They are elitist. I won’t get into my VAST knowledge on the subject, as I try to keep things simple for people like you. I leave enough bread crumbs for you to find your way, so good luck with that.


Kevin Jackson says:
February 24, 2010 at 4:24 pm

@Jim – I’m glad “puddin’” is here. At least there is the possibility for education of ONE!


Kevin Jackson says:
February 24, 2010 at 4:25 pm

@mt – Most of the people with these bounties on their heads could care less. There is some rich Republican they know will be responsible to pay it…until there are no more rich Republicans!


proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 4:55 pm

@jim: right, because all critique comes from a place of hatred / envy. so what would that say about your comments directed at me?

the question i asked is the question no one here seems capable of answering, what does conservatism and the values espoused by tea-parties have to do with anti-racist action on the part of the state? show me a tea-bag (not a republican partisan, but an authentic unaffiliated conservative) who, if transported back to the 1860s, would support the kind of state that Lincoln created. show me one who would have supported the federal occupation of the south during reconstruction. show me one who if transported to the 1950s and 60s that would have supported the use of the national guard against american “patriots” attempting to defend their states rights against an “arrogant” and “authoritarian” federal government.

kevin is attempting to pass off the actions of a political party as expressions of a particular ideology, but, of course, nothing the republicans did in the examples he uses were conservative. so, to the extent that you celebrate these moments in american history, you are indicting conservatism. and no racist quote from lbj can change that.

@kevin: don’t make the same mistake your hero glenn beck does and conflate “Progressives” (i.e the Progressive Party of the early 20th c.) w/ progressivism. and i’m here anytime you feel like schooling me with your “vast” knowledge on the subject. i actually know a thing or two, too.


JJ SOLARI says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:02 pm

pudhunny you dont know squat, you dont even know what your own name is it sure aint proudhon.


proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:03 pm

okay, thanks. bye.


proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:04 pm

hey jim, i wonder of jj is envious of me.


proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:13 pm

actually, i have to say, i’m pretty impressed that jj was able to surmise that i am not, in fact, a 19th century french libertarian writing from beyond the grave. you found me out.


Jim Schurmann says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:29 pm

Puddin I just love irritating you. Peace and love baby.


JJ SOLARI says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:57 pm

i see where that rascal limbaugh is going to try and poo pooh glenn beck’s suggestion that there be a 3rd political party. that limbaugh is a crafty bastard and he’s squirming scared about this idea for some reason and it aint the one he claims it is that it will “weaken” the republican party and ensure the democrats prevail. this is a lie. i think limbaugh’s afraid of
palin. for some reason. to get back to the point here, pretty good classroom discussion today, Kevin, I’ll have to read this a few times to get the details absorbed. but i’m up to that.


Gadsden says:
February 24, 2010 at 5:57 pm

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: The left NEEDS racism and classism to further their agenda. That is why they will not let it DIE. I sit beside ‘working class’ folk who fall for it every time. The politics of ENVY.

The end justifies the means: The end being socialISM and stateISM…..the means being classISM and racISM.

OK, that’s enough ‘ism’s’ for one lifetime.

BTW, last time I checked, Envy is a sin.


Taqiyyotomist says:
February 24, 2010 at 6:40 pm

Kevin, great article!

“Consider that Democrats were able to regain their power after Reconstruction, practically erasing their vile history of racism. They then transferred their legacy of racism to the party who actually freed the slaves and fought with valor for civil rights for blacks—the Republicans! Now that is something on which to marvel, and the Democrats did this over a period of a few decades…taking baby steps.”

“…something on which to marvel..” Indeed. People who call the progressives and democrats “idiots” really don’t understand at all. These people are geniuses. I think the word in the KJV for the Serpent in the Garden is “subtil”, and OE or ME word from whence our “Subtle” derives. We know what subtle means, but in the context of both morality and deceit, it takes on a darker meaning. They have been “subtle” indeed, with the baby steps. That’s what baby steps is all about, the subtlety. Like the old adage about boiling a frog – it’ll notice and jump right out of the pot if you just crank up the heat quickly. But not if you’re SUBTLE about it. It takes a good chess-playing mind to do what they have done. Brainwash an entire population, take their schools, their arts, their media, their publishers. All over a long period of time using baby steps.

Gen.3:1 (partial)
“Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made.”

Subtle, from dictionary.com
1. thin, tenuous, or rarefied, as a fluid or an odor.
2. fine or delicate in meaning or intent; difficult to perceive or understand: subtle irony.
3. delicate or faint and mysterious: a subtle smile.
4. requiring mental acuteness, penetration, or discernment: a subtle philosophy.
5. characterized by mental acuteness or penetration: a subtle understanding.
6.cunning, wily, or crafty: a subtle liar.
7.insidious in operation: subtle poison.
8.skillful, clever, or ingenious: a subtle painter.

The progressives and libs and marxists (I thrice repeat myself), they are not idiots. They are not making errors, mistakes, blunders. They know exactly what they are doing and why, almost every time.

For example, when most of the mainstream media news outlets do their level best to paint the Tea-partiers as a bunch of violent racists….it’s not because they are STUPID and don’t know the truth. They know exactly what they are doing, and why. Like their father in hell.


Kevin Jackson says:
February 24, 2010 at 9:50 pm

@Taq – Excellent references! Battlefield promotion in your future and one for jj as well.


Kevin Jackson says:
February 24, 2010 at 9:53 pm

@proudhon – It is too easy to say, “I’d like to take you back to…” a certain time. I’d like to take you back to a time when you were being oppressed and see how you would react! So let me put it this way. You are getting you butt kicked. Two racists are watching you, and ONE stops the butt-kicking. I may not like either one, but I would sure be happy that ONE of them stopped my ass-kicking from continuing. Now take me back to that! THAT has led to my ability to pen, to opine. If the other guy had won, well I think you know the outcome?


proudhon says:
February 24, 2010 at 10:57 pm

actually kevin, to go along with your analogy, it was your ability to fight back, not some benevolent gift from either racist, that lead to your “ability to pen, to opine,” etc. you don’t seem to give black folks much credit for their own liberation from slavery and later jim crow.

but again you’re skirting the question. you claim the pre-1877 republican party as some sort of ideological forebear. but point to one thing radical republicans like stevens and sumner believed that could be considered conservative by your standards. likewise, point to one thing john c calhoun or andrew johnson believed that you would consider “liberal” or “progressive,” let alone “leftist.”


Sir RonB says:
February 25, 2010 at 12:09 am

$15 Billion sure can buy an awful lot of Enfamil and Huggies creating thousands of jobs in the manufacturing of Huggies and the milking of all those Enfamil cows. Baby steps is right. Get what you can now because wars are won in battles not all at once.


Kevin Jackson says:
February 25, 2010 at 12:11 am

@proudhon – You deal in absolutes. I don’t believe Republicans are all good, as my analogy OBVIOUSLY conveyed. I won’t get into the Conservative v Liberal issue because that clouds things for the less informed. I am certainly aware of the differences. However if there is anything that has switched over the years, it is certainly the definitions of Liberal and Conservative. It is interesting to note that Libs and Conservatives are switched in Europe for example.


JJ SOLARI says:
February 25, 2010 at 12:13 am

pud-pud: what is YOUR solution to things. let’s hear it. you’re killing everybody with your weird, disjointed sentences about some arcane aspect of something or other. fortunately for us all you’re KIND of fun, like watching a wolf that just ate a bait-rabbit filled with strychnine. still, before you writhe to a silent, drooling, overweight blubbery mass of motionless anvil-like dead weight, maybe you could give us your brief but erratically dissociated view of a perfect world under the pudhunny mantle.


Mick says:
February 25, 2010 at 11:52 am

A $15 billion jobs bill that is basically a infrastructure bill to repair roads and bridges does not and will not generate permanent jobs. Nor will the temporary jobs for the census create permanent jobs. Once the temporary jobs are completed the people who had these jobs are back collecting unemployment benefits.

While typing this comment I’m listening to the Obama gathering for health care. A medical doctor, a republican, from the Senate made a suggestion of allowing people to purchase health care across state lines. This along with eliminating the fraudulent type activity in health care would cut one dollar out of every three spent. The president’s response…..SHOWS SOME PROMISE!!!!!

Oh my, Oh my, Oh my………downright stupidity when you know and are told and told again what can reduce the problems within the whole health care fiasco and essentially ignore sensible comments on ways to improve the situation and reduce overall costs and you take it and brush it off like dandruff on your shoulder????????


Jim Schurmann says:
February 25, 2010 at 1:34 pm

The $15 billion jobs bill for infrastructure jobs. Just another old plan out of the Libs. playbook.They did the same thing in the 1930s with the (CCC) Civilian Conservation Corps. and the (WPA) Work Projects Administration. Historians believe these make work projects actually prolonged the recovery rather than helping it.


Reese says:
February 26, 2010 at 8:57 am

Spot ON!! Thank you, Kevin.

Although I think the “baby steps” era has come to an end, as BO stated yesterday when asked about the size of the HC bill, “Baby steps don’t get you to where you need to go.”

I’m grateful he’s turned in the ice-pick and reached for the pick-ax to hack away at our Liberties, in a way. I wonder how many would have noticed had that not happened. How many would still be oblivious, had “they” not started getting excited and getting greedy in their move forward to fundamentally change America and the law of the land?

Thank you for being in the fray of it all, Kevin, you are appreciated!


soifa says:
February 26, 2010 at 3:21 pm

so that i may joint the fray, there are some little nuances that get lost in the subliminal. this may keep some of the high browed from continuing to the ridiculious.
there are few lessons that need to be looked at again.
first, to whomever doesn’t know their history is doomed to repeat it.
Andrew Jojnson was a Democrat, from Tennesse – shocking- look at the way presidents were elected – oh yeah, that isnt what we do today. He also liked to keep the Constitution handy.
reconstructed was ended by a near Constitutional Crisis – R.B. Hayes. Bueller? anyone?
the two party system keeps everyone compromising, it prevents coalition governments. Wiemar? hmmm, crickets.
oh yeah, and modern Republicans, closer to the progressives of the early 20th cent. Demos, closer to Maoists. does anyone know about Classical Liberals?
Kevin keep those rants coming, the libs are really showing their lack of learning. they learned like the government schools wanted them to, just regurgitate and get an A. it makes them feel so evolved.


Kevin Jackson says:
February 27, 2010 at 11:38 pm

@Sir RonB – Huggies! Huggies! LOL


Kevin Jackson says:
February 27, 2010 at 11:39 pm

@soifa – You are enlightened! We could have interesting discussions!


Kevin Jackson says:
February 27, 2010 at 11:40 pm

@Reese – Don’t believe Obama. He IS taking baby steps, or DeathCare would have already passed!


Kevin Jackson says:
February 27, 2010 at 11:41 pm

@Jim S – Yes, The RAW Deal, and that racist FDR!


Taqiyyotomist says:
February 28, 2010 at 12:04 am

Kevin, I agree re: sofia’s post. I’d like a lesson or ten, since numerous of her references were over my head. So much history, so little time to study it. So few historians to trust. What do I read to figure out that post, aside from the twofold gist, that your rants rock and that libs are mostly teh suck…? Not wikipedia, but I will. Tomorrow. I know enough, somehow, to know that conservatives and Republicans are more right and Democrats and progressives and so-called Liberals are more wrong, but I am still lacking in detailed knowledge of history. I have a more complete picture of the world from Moses to I-Pods than most of my friends and neighbors, but sometimes a single cryptic post can humble a man, make him realize he knows just slightly more than jack squat.


Taqiyyotomist says:
February 28, 2010 at 12:14 am

And welcome, sofia. Please join the fray. As I mentioned above, even many of us conservatives, although sometimes handy with facts, are quite deficient in learning.

Go on ahead and be less cryptic (for it was, despite your exasperation for things everyone ought to know…), unlearned is not unable to learn. If you don’t wish to elaborate, and in doing so, enlighten, I suppose I could understand – it can be tiresome and time-consuming explaining things that you know everyone should already know.


Taqiyy. says:
February 28, 2010 at 11:38 am

Kevin, congrats! I just noticed that this article was on American Thinker!


Janelle says:
February 28, 2010 at 7:32 pm

The Ferris Bueller reference was a hoot, sofia!


Kit Ashworth says:
February 28, 2010 at 9:33 pm

Proudhon sounds like he/she is defending democrats to the death. Why his/her head in the sand, I don’t know. The dems must have made that sand must taste good and smell good with one of their hoodwinking social programs. Please wake up and smell the coffee. Do yourself a favor and quit being bamboozled by democrats, they have never meant black people any good; they’ve been using their advantage for the last 100 plus years. They never wanted slavery to end, and it hasn’t for them. Instead of being their physical slaves, blacks are now their social slaves. Well not all blacks, some of us didn’t stay ignorant of their devices. As for me, I’se r’lized I’se was free, I done left Master Dem plantation! Whether or not a conservative would have supported Lincoln back in 1860 is hardly relavant, the point is that Republicans pushed for the abolishment of slavery, passed the civil rights acts of 1867, 1875 despite democratic oposition. Republicans passed the 13th, 14th, 15th amendment which abolished slavery, legally made blacks full citizens, and gave black men the right to vote. And yes, I believe they would have supported federal troop occupation in the racist democratic south during reconstruction. They were there to enforce the abolishment of slavery and to protect the new freedmen. You say you don’t understand why Kevin supports Republicans. If he does, could it be because he knows that the Republican party has done more for blacks then dems. I for one do not understand that if you know your history and do some research, why you continue to support democrats, liberal or otherwise. Leave the plantation and explore the truth about your master, ‘Master Dem’. If you’re not a black loyal democrat, my apologies, preach the above message to the next misguided loyal black democrat you meet.

SIncerely,
Proud black indpendent consevative black woman, who wants Obama out in 2012!


JJ SOLARI says:
February 28, 2010 at 11:58 pm

I want that son of a bitch out in the morning.


Kevin Jackson says:
March 1, 2010 at 7:14 am

@jj – Glad you gave it a deeper read. I agree that Obama should be gone before 2012, though unlikely. People don’t actually care about the Constitution much these days or incompetence!


Kevin Jackson says:
March 1, 2010 at 7:15 am

@Taq – Thanks for seeing the article in Am Thinker. I try to write there every once in a while.


Kevin Jackson says:
March 1, 2010 at 7:16 am

@Kit – We are of one mind “sistagirl!” I adore educated black people, and educated people of all colors!


Reese says:
March 1, 2010 at 9:02 am

Kevin, I think that BO is a symptom of the parasite, a rather aggressive symptom, that the other symptoms were reacting off of and got a bit excited and aggressive.

I think after the initial surge in reactions, they [the symptoms to the growing parasite] are remembering themselves and trying to reign in so as not to totally freak out the host, and alert the host to the cause of illness (too late) so as not to risk eradication of the parasite.

Yea…he and his cronies turned in the icepick (for chipping away at our Liberties), for the backhoe, now they have turned in the backhoe for a pick-ax. Fortunately it alerted a lot of people, and they are alerting more people…domino effect fashion.

LOL…it seems it’s analogy morning here. Keep up the good fight and ya’ll are still in my thoughts.


Reese says:
March 1, 2010 at 9:12 am

UGH…forgot my point LOL…

I think the days of “baby steps” are set aside, and the giant leaps that were attempted, alerted the people so the movement is backwards to basic “adult” steps; which doesn’t seem so huge after the attempted giant leap, and an easier pill to swallow by some not so alert.


GRIM says:
March 16, 2010 at 2:48 pm

@Mick unfortunately, though, the federal government cannot make the decision to allow the purchasing of health care across state lines. That’s going to have to be something that state governments get together and do. I’d be happy with just “local co-ops” … an example would be Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri. They’re close neighbors, and friendly most of the time. Students reasonably close are granted in-state tuition as part of a local cooperative effort to work together. I don’t think we’ll see every state open up it’s healthcare to every other state in the near future (though I hope I’m wrong). One reason is that each state mandates different “minimum requirements” for being included in the different plans. The more inclusive (or lower premium), the higher the cost.

Another thing that would help is if the MARKET set prices for things instead of the government. Obama liked to ridicule Republicans on opposing his plans by saying “doctors will cut off a foot, or remove tonsils to get more money” but failed to mention “we set the prices”. he also couldn’t come up with any examples of that happening. Big surprise, I know.

While I’d love to do away with pre-existing conditions, they are another way to keep premiums for health people low. I am most certainly not healthy (overweight and plenty of lingering injuries from sports and the army) but I understand the concept and why it’s important. MORE important, though, should be restricting the ability of companies to drop customers at the drop of a hat. I still don’t think that should be government mandated, but it’s a travesty that things like that are occuring.

I could be wrong, but I got sick of hearing Obama say “that’s why senators and representatives get such good insurance, because there’s millions of government employees”… and i wanted to say, “So you’re telling me EVERY government employee gets the same benefits that our Congress gets? Pardon me while I get my BS card out.

ALSO, Obama says “you can keep your insurance after you’re fired” in his ‘health care bill’. Well, that’s already an option known as COBRA. Unfortunately for most people, they don’t realize the amazing cost that employers pay for their employees premiums. Places like where I work, it’s a split (part employer, part employee), but some place pay 100% of the coverage. When you’re fired, that’s gone and you end up paying 100% of the bill. My guess is that it’s a pretty big jump when paying it all yourself.

OH, and did I mention that I’m a 24-year old poor white kid without health insurance that knows this stuff? amazing how much info is out there that the government doesn’t “know” (conveniently) or hides?


Aussie says:
March 26, 2010 at 2:36 am

Kevin, I lost you for a while because of feed issues. I cannot bring up your blog in bloglines, and I had the wrong feed for another reader. I have been missing your rants.

Now to address the idiocy of Puddles who really has no understanding of the Radical Republicans.

Ya know what, the name of the group should have been a clue “radical republicans”. These people were the carpetbaggers in some respects. They were the ones who assisted those members of the State houses that were really quite corrupt. I dare not tell you that such members were not the whites, because in that period of Reconstruction the whites were the ones who were denied the vote!!!!!

To my mind, upon reading about the period, but also needing to read more… the Radical Republicans seem to be more like the RINO rather than the middle of the road Republican and Democrat. (most of those Dems who were middle of the road are now Independent thanks to the Marxists).

Now let’s get some more of that history straight. Which group of people intimidated the Blacks and the Republicans? Which group rode around on horses with white hoods on their heads? Which group used scare tactics to frighten the blacks from attending meetings and to frighten them out of voting?

Well ya know that group was not made up of Republicans. It was not made up of conservative people. It was the KKK. The people behind the KKK were members of the Democrat Party.

Next set of questions for poor little puddles: when those Democrats gained control of those state houses what happened next? Do you know puddles?

Well it is like this poor dumbpudhun, when those Democrats gained back control of the South, it was the blacks who were disenfranchised. This was achieved by passing laws regarding the requirement of passing literacy tests in order to be allowed to vote.

So, who was it dumbhun that tried to ensure that the black would not be represented in the Congress? It was the Democrat Party!!

And you dumbpuddle, you are the one who constantly touts for this same group of people who are the true racists… but you are too blind to see the truth!!!


Dana Maxwell says:
April 1, 2010 at 10:16 pm

1st time to visit your site. Loved reading your comments as well as being informative.
I’m 67 yr old grandmother and legal guardian of 9 yr. old. I’m tough enough to tighten
my belt and do whatever it takes to see that these children have a good life in the future. I think that as Americans we are all tough and willing to do whatever it takes.The current admin. needs to remember just where we came from and what it took to build this country. We do not need the government(which ever party is in the majority or control) to give us anything. Let the Constitution stand, let the banks and big business FAIL. We are willing to take anything to get this country back on the right path. I’M TOUGH ENOUGH! ARE YOU! I think I will have a T-shirt made with this on it!!!! In fact, I think it would be interesting to put this question to listeners and readers of comments just to see how many responses you get. Don’t have to vent, just call in or email the words, “I’m Tough Enough!” On second thought this T-shirt thing could get me in trouble. I’ll think about that. But I still like getting responses from listeners and readers. Thanks, tomato


Leave a comment