Click here to secure your copy of the 2nd edition of "The BIG Black Lie!"
Close

Not a member yet? Register now and get started.

lock and key

Sign in to your account.

Account Login

Forgot your password?

 //  MediaWatch – Blood in the Water

Posted on Monday, December 8th, 2008 by Kevin Jackson

The Tribune Company, a newspaper publisher and broadcaster is considering filing for bankruptcy. The irony is that this company is owned by Sam Zell, a billionaire. Apparently being the good businessman that he is, Sam decided not to throw good money after bad and bailout his own media outlet. Congress? Hello? Is this thing on?

According to this Bloomberg article,

The economic crisis is hurting newspaper publishers across the U.S. as advertising dries up and companies struggle to pay down debt with shrinking cash flow. To reduce costs, Tribune’s Los Angeles Times eliminated another 75 newsroom positions in October, or about 10 percent of the editorial staff. The company has also cut jobs at its other publications.

The drop in Tribune’s newspaper ad sales accelerated to 19 percent in the three months through September, steeper than the 15 percent slides in the first and second quarters. Overall publishing revenue declined 13 percent to $653.6 million, while broadcast and entertainment fell 5.6 percent to $383.4 million.

“The newspaper industry continues to see extraordinary declines in ad revenues, and Tribune is no exception,” Zell, 67, the company’s chief executive officer, said in a Nov. 10 statement when Tribune reported third-quarter results.”

I call BS on Sam’s reasoning, and say that it is not the economic crisis that is hurting the industry. I think it’s a few other things, like Conservatives are the heartbeat of America, and we run the majority of businesses. Why would we advertise in liberal rags?

Next, the fact is that these newspapers are no longer reporting news. They are so heavily biased, that to say you get news is really a stretch. When you lose your Conservative readership, you lose your paying audience. Liberals are the people who pick up the paper after a Conservative has finished reading it, and the people who order water for their “two drink minimum”.

I must say that I am actually enjoying the demise of the media, given their atrocious behavior in helping elect our new Kenyan leader, and their treatment of Conservatives in general. And the fact that their demise is not limited to the Tribune, but also to other venerable liberal strongholds, like the NY Times just makes me giggle like a gigolo with a full workload.

22622_cover_front

“Sexy Brilliance brings levity to the political discourse in this country. I put a comedic spin on what's happening in America, and showcases the ironies and hypocrisies of politics in America.”

Buy_now

style="font-size:12pt;color:#262626;">S&P slashes NY Times rating to junk after gloomy outlook

By Andrew EdgecliffeJohnson in New York

Standard & Poor’s slashed its rating on the New York Times Company by three notches to junk yesterday after the publisher reported fresh impairment charges, a quarterly underlying loss and a review of its dividend policy.

The decline in print advertising revenues that has dogged US newspapers accelerated in the third quarter as the economy worsened, said Janet Robinson, chief executive. Visibility about future advertising bookings was “limited”, she added.

Considering the NYT’s recent downgrade to “junk” status, perhaps venerable was too strong a word to describe them? And to think that I called the NY Time “junk” because of editorial content, when in fact it really is junk! I can’t wait until next quarter to see the rating below “junk”.

So we have one major media outlet considering bankruptcy, and one exposed as “junk”, what could possibly be next? Since you asked…

Here it is. The Miami Herald, the #3 newspaper chain in the country can’t even find anyone who wants to take her to the prom. Apparently she’s picked up a few pounds, called debt?

“Citing people briefed on the company’s plans, the Times said the nation’s number-three newspaper chain, struggling with debt and a downturn in advertising, wants to sell the newspaper. Its sources were not aware of any serious offers.”

Don’t be surprised if the Liberal Triumvirate of Obama, Pelosi and Reid step in to bailout the media. After all it is Christmas, so why not put another gift the taxpayers don’t want under the Christmas tree.

But seriously, don’t be surprised when you hear the Fed giving serious consideration to socializing the media, and offering a bailout. What would happen if the Liberals didn’t have the bully pulpit from which to practice their tyranny?

That’s my rant!

© 2008 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere All Rights Reserved

22 Comments

 

Alexander Schmitt says:
December 8, 2008 at 7:08 pm

I live in Miami and can tell you few of us actually read the “paper”. In my opinion the news paper is a dying media conduit. The business has a high TCO and low margins. When you consider the paper, equipment, maintenance, delivery and slew of other associated costs. Forget it!


The Black Sphere says:
December 8, 2008 at 7:37 pm

And thankfully so, Alexander. They have become little more than liberal media outlets. Thank God for the revolution of the internet!


Rich says:
December 8, 2008 at 8:16 pm

Fortunately, Sam Zell bought me out of the The Tribune Company before it got as bad as it is today.

When I was a modest shareholder, I would often wonder why the Tribune of all papers wasn’t making more a presence online like The New York Times, WSJ, etc.

Zell thinks like the businessman, which is exactly why he won’t throw more money into what’s become a sink hole. Nice piece.

Worth following up on.

Best,
Rich


Biased Girl says:
December 8, 2008 at 9:14 pm

Another great Rant! Newspapers are dying because they’ve followed a business model Liberals would love…As they lost readers to a more “instant medium” of cable news and the internet, they raised the price of advertising.


Pacaderm says:
December 8, 2008 at 9:27 pm

What will all the poor birds do? Or is that “doo”?


The Black Sphere says:
December 8, 2008 at 10:07 pm

Pacaderm, nice touch!

BiasedGirl, thanks for the props, and excellent point on what a great Liberal business, the newspaper biz!

Rich, thanks for the comment and validation.


Anonymous says:
December 8, 2008 at 10:38 pm

We get the Washington Post and it is a terrible paper. We have canceled it twice and they just keep dumping it at our driveway. we have not paid them a dime. We put it in the recycle bin straight form the driveway most days.
Today Barb Steisand is on the front, gosh I dislike her so much.
the wash Post is a terrible paper, poorly written stories, and very biased. It is disgusting and some days almost as infuriating as listening to MSNBC… which I do not do either, ha.

~Rosemary

I have been reading just not commenting lately, I have been kinda sickish, yay. not.


roihunters says:
December 9, 2008 at 3:34 am

I equate most newspapers today as nothing more then pamphleteers of the early days of this country. It seems they are simply in place to help spread the liberal agenda and destroy or mock anyone with conservative values.

They are out of touch with the mainstream. Their sales reflect this. If they had a product worth buying, more people would.


The Black Sphere says:
December 9, 2008 at 3:40 am

Rosemary, I’ve missed you, and feel better! I agree with your take on the Washington Post. Suggestion: toilet paper!

Roihunters: Agree, they can sell what people aren’t buying! I congratulate them all for their failures…a tribute to Liberalism in business!


Renee+ says:
December 9, 2008 at 4:39 am

Just say No! to liberal rags!!!

and I’m not sure I’d even want to Wipe my tail with the Washington Post!!!


madmath1 says:
December 9, 2008 at 9:19 am

Yea, I stopped reading the papers years ago. Why pay 50 cents just to be insulted. I can get that free from liberals on the streets.

Frankly, I wouldn’t trust a newspaper to be worthly of toilet paper. God only knows what they’re putting in the paper to cut on costs.

Final thought, and it’s scary. What if the government bails out the newspapers? They need their pulpit to preach from, but if they have ownership in the news media, what’s to keep it from becoming Pravda?


Stormbringer says:
December 9, 2008 at 10:55 pm

Maybe — just perhaps — you’ll write something that I take issue with. Not bloody likely, though.


The Black Sphere says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:44 am

Stormbringer, get me out of your head! You know we have “mind-melded” my friend. My rants are your rants!


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:13 pm

GlobalRoamer on 12/08/2008

There is a great book out; “The Gospel According to the New York Times.” It is a great book about how the Times changed from reporting news to trying to shape social agenda. It is all fact based, uses a lot of Lexus-Nexus statistics to show how they fail to report balanced news, works to press for social change like live birth abortion, homosexuals, and liberal democrats.

I am not surprised this is happening. Perhaps the liberal socialists might think of it as natural selection.


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:14 pm

mmaine on 12/08/2008

FTA “the fact is that these newspapers are no longer reporting news. They are so heavily biased, that to say you get news is really a stretch.”

I agree with you 100%


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:15 pm

EMFK on 12/08/2008

When we were little, reading the paper was fun! On the weekends, before breakfast everyone read some section of the paper. It was a family activity for many Americans and their families. It helped create family topics and conversations throughout the day sometimes. However, as we got older—it started becoming apparent that something was amiss. As you grow older, you begin to formulate your own political ideas and beliefs and then you realize that what you believe doesn’t mesh with the paper your reading from.

This was true for those of us growing up watching Dan Rather. Always thought he was fantastic, but it had more to do with our grandparents and parents watching him on a nightly basis. He was someone you thought you could trust with your news.

Again, as we grew older we began noticing that he was skewering the line of ‘reporting the news’ and giving his opinions of the news.

There are many columnists that we grew up reading and loved. If the world needs one thing, it is for more Erma Bombeck’s of this world. Her columns were fantastic and provided an insight into life’s more amusing everyday adventures. The rest of the columns and columnists—we won’t miss as much. Sad.


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:16 pm

thoughtsonthis on 12/08/2008

Some years ago the NY Times subscription department called our home, asking if we would like a subscription to their paper. I think I surprised the sales person by quickly telling her no thank you. She then asked why I would turn down the offer and I simply told her that her paper was too liberal.

I know you should read the other side of the issues, but why should I pay to read something I don’t believe.


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:17 pm

Bagio54 on 12/08/2008

I no longer subscribe to any newspaper and when watching MSM I turn the station as soon as Obama’s name is mentioned because I already know they are going to let me know again how wonderful he is, or how terrible Bush is, I’m not a Bush fan but give me a break.


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:18 pm

tasine 22 hr 49 min ago

I subscribe to no newspaper or news magazine, and I watch no TV news. They offer me exactly nothing but ulcers. One of the local rags asked me why I didn’t subscribe, and I told them because I wanted news and they didn’t provide it. She wasn’t happy with my answer, but they quit bothering me.


Anonymous says:
December 10, 2008 at 4:19 pm

lilamae 16 hr 51 min ago

Caught a little of Sean Hannity on the radio on the commute from work. There was mention of Tribune’s sale of Wrigley Field being blocked by the governor of Illinois? Who has just been indicted for something related to the sale? of Obama’s U.S. Senate seat. Ya’ll might want to keep your eyes/ear open for further developments. This could get very ugly for the President Elect (as well as other prominent Illinois politicians).


Susan says:
February 6, 2010 at 11:19 am

Florida Lawyer Claims Rights To Tea Party Name — Says Activist: He’s ‘Trying To Hijack Our Movement’
Zachary Roth | January 14, 2010, 12:05PM
Spread the word and support this article. Share it on Digg!

At a tea party in Philadelphia in 2009.
Read More
Doug Guetzloe, Everett Wilkinson, Fred O’Neal, Tea Parties, Tea Party Express, Tea Party Nation, Tea Party Patriots
Share
274 diggs Send to a friend!To email: Your Name: Your email:

A Florida lawyer who registered the “Tea Party” as an official political party doesn’t want to share the name that’s become synonymous with the fledgling grassroots conservative movement. Fred O’Neal is pressuring activists in the state to rechristen their local Tea Party groups — and in doing so, he’s become the latest figure to be charged with co-opting the movement for personal gain.

In August, O’Neal, an Orlando attorney and anti-tax activist who until then had had little involvement with the Tea Party movement, registered the “Tea Party” as a new political party with the Florida Division of Elections. O’Neal has told the press he intends to recruit conservative candidates under the Tea Party banner — an idea that hasn’t sat well with many Tea Party activists, who view any organized political party with distrust.

Now, according to one activist, O’Neal and his business partner “are trying to ‘hijack’ our movement and turn it into the thing we are protesting for their own personal gain.”

Everett Wilkinson, a South Florida Tea Party activist, told TPMmuckraker that in mid-December he received a letter from O’Neal, citing Florida law and claiming the right to the Tea Party name, on the basis of having registered the Tea Party as an official political party. O’Neal, who did not respond to TPMmuckraker’s request for comment, demanded that Wilkinson stop using the name for his local group, according to Wilkinson. Wilkinson, who opposes the idea of turning the Tea Party into an organized political party, had clashed with O’Neal when O’Neal tried to promote his effort on a website run by Wilkinson and other Tea Party activists.

Wilkinson said he forwarded O’Neal’s letter to an attorney, who quickly told O’Neal that he had misread the law, and that Wilkinson would go on using the Tea Party name for his local group. O’Neal, according to Wilkinson, backed down, acknowledging that Wilkinson had the right to continue using the name*.

In an email to fellow activists sent soon after and forwarded to TPMmuckraker, Wilkinson wrote that O’Neal and his business partner, political consultant Doug Guetzloe, “are trying to ‘hijack’ our movement and turn it into the thing we are protesting for their own personal gain.” Wilkinson added: “Our sincere hope is that these political opportunists will see that America has been fooled by two parties and we don’t need another.”

But O’Neal hasn’t gone away. On Sunday he sent an email — subsequently posted on a conservative website — to another Florida Tea Partier with whom he had clashed, writing: “I suggest you take a look at whether your … Tea Party needs to get a new name.” O’Neal cited the law, and added: “[U]ntil the law is changed, I suggest obeying it. He signed the letter: “Fred O’Neal, a registered member of the Tea Party , a Florida political party.”

Then last night, Guetzloe sent an email to a Google group of conservative activists — read to TPMmuckraker by someone who received it — in which he charged that Wilkinson and his allies had defamed O’Neal in online postings. “If [O'Neal] wanted to shut down every blog, every website, and every entity that uses “TEA PARTY”, he could,” wrote Guetzloe. “He obviously does not want to do that or he would have already.”

In other words, the threat to prevent Tea Partiers from using the Tea Party name appears to remain out there.

O’Neal is just the latest figure to provoke charges of seeking to profit off the Tea Party movement, whose core supporters pride themselves on their idealism. As we’ve reported, numerous conservative activists have raised concerns about the financial arrangements for the upcoming National Tea Party Convention — where Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann are scheduled to speak — and have questioned the motives of the event’s organizer, Nashville lawyer Judson Phillips. And the Tea Party Express, a group created by a team of well-connected political consultants, has been slammed by some Tea Party groups as an inauthentic creation of the organized Republican party.

* O’Neal has now told TPMmuckraker that, counter to Wilkinson’s assertion, he never acknowledged Wilkinson’s right to use the name. We’ll have more on what O’Neal told us soon.


Susan says:
February 6, 2010 at 11:19 am

More Tea Party Activists and Groups Wanted
.

Last Tuesday, I filed with other tea party leaders filed a lawsuit in Federal Court against the Mr. Fred O’Neal and Doug Guetzloe (attorney and political consultant) that started “Tea Party” as a political Third Party.

The reason why we filed this lawsuit is because Mr. Fred O’Neal and Doug Guetzloe are threatening tea party leaders. He is also claiming all rights to the name “Tea Party.” See article “Florida Lawyer Claims Rights To Tea Party Name –
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/florida_lawyer_cl...

We would like to add other tea party leaders to our lawsuit. It will not cost you anything to join. You can see a copy of our complaint at http://bit.ly/5BYdqc or for more information contact:

Michael R. Caputo
michaelrcaputo@gmail.com
Caputo Public Relations, Inc.
12864 Biscayne Blvd, #332
North Miami, FL 33181-2007
305-733-3431

Let’s not let the politicians and political parties take over our movement. We can and we will hold true to our mission and values.
Sincerely,

Everett Wilkinson
SouthFloridaTeaParty.org
TeaPartyPatriots.org

Press Release
(MIAMI, FL) Legal counsel for Florida Tea Party activists and organizations today filed a complaint against a new political party of the same name seeking a declaratory judgment separating the two
groups. The conservative activists also asked the court to order the newly registered Florida Tea Party to stop threatening them and their colleagues with trademark litigation. “We believe the identity of the Florida Tea Party has been hijacked by cynical forces,” South Florida Tea Party chairman Everett Wilkinson said. “We are especially concerned the group is improperly leveraging
the tea party movement to support the gubernatorial campaign of Sen. Paula Dockery.”

Republican campaign consultant Doug Guetzloe and his associates Fredric O’Neal and Nicholas Egoroff registered the name “Tea Party” as a political party with the Florida Secretary of State in August 2009. Two of the founders are cashiered county GOP committeemen; none were
active in the state’s Tea Party organizations. Since registering, the group has represented themselves as leaders of the Florida Tea Party movement to the media, endorsed Sen. Paula
Dockery for governor in the Republican Primary and threatened authentic Tea Party activists with legal action over use of the name. Officers of the new party have also threatened to run third party
candidates against both Republicans and Democrats. Longtime Tea Party activists in the Sunshine State are working toward reform within the Republican Party and view third party candidacies as county- productive.

“The registered party and original Florida Tea Party activists are miles apart in our political agenda and priorities,” Wilkinson said. “Make no mistake: the Tea Party on the Florida ballot is not the
grassroots group you may think it is.” “Only through a declaratory judgment will activists across Florida know who is who in this important election year,” Wilkinson said. “Likewise only a judge’s order will end the new party’s threats of litigation.”

A copy of the complaint can be seen here: http://bit.ly/5BYdqc Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include the following tea party activists and organizations:

TIM MCCLELLAN,
A Tea Party activist,
EVERETT WILKINSON,
A Tea Party activist,
SOUTH FLORIDA TEA PARTY, INC.,
A Florida non-profit corporation,
JUST PATRIOTS, INC.,
d/b/a UNITED AMERICAN TEA PARTY,
A Florida non-profit corporation,
MARTIN 9/12 TEA PARTY COMMITTEE,
A group of concerned citizens,
NAPLES TEA PARTY,
A group of concerned citizens, At press time, more Tea Party activists and groups are signing up as
plaintiffs in the complaint. For a PDF of the complaint and more information, please contact Michael Caputo at 305-733-3431 or cap…@caputopr.com.

©2010 South Florida Tea Party | 510 S Broadway Lantana Fl


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.