Missouri Governor Jay “McLovin” Nixon’s veto of the Republican sponsored photo ID bill is another Democrat slap in the face to law-abiding, taxpaying citizens of Missouri and proves that Nixon could care less about protecting the rights of Missouri citizens. The truth is Nixon is about empowering criminals and getting more illegal votes.
In a letter explaining his veto, Nixon said the photo ID requirement would have hurt senior citizens and people with disabilities who are qualified to vote but are less likely to have a drivers license or other government-issued photo ID. “Disenfranchising certain classes of persons is not acceptable,” he said.
To exercise your #1 right as a citizen of America living in the state of Missouri, you might wonder what it takes to be eligible to case your vote?
Trending: Trump: The Great Peacemaker
Besides having a pulse and the ability to fog a mirror, all it takes is to vote in Missouri is a utility bill, a bank statement or paycheck stub, all things you can find dumpster diving. Have any of those easy to get items and you get to exercise the Constitutional right afforded all American citizens living in The Democrat Union of Socialists of Missouri, by decree of Emperor Jay Nixon.
A 2007 study by Washington University found that among blacks, young people and low-income residents — historically among the most loyal Democratic supporters — about 80 percent of registered voters had access to [emphasis added] a government-issued photo ID. That compares with about 90 percent of white, middle-class and middle-aged voters.
Even with all this voter disenfranchisement in Missouri, (Note race and age discrimination undertones in the study), it appears that it may not all be the fault of “the man.”
Voter turnout in the November 2010 election was 46.8%. Apparently people are not feeling that disenfranchised when you consider that of the 80% – 90% of the people in Missouri who are not disenfranchised, only 46.8% decided to vote.
Nixon knows that every citizen in Missouri can get a valid state-issued photo ID; illegals can not. And in order to win re-election, Nixon needs that vote. He will do anything to get it, including disenfranchising productive Missouri citizens.
Will Nixon next allow illegals to serve on our juries? Why not just elect illegals as judges? The fact is we don’t need illegals as judges; we have Democrats.
In 2006, Republican lawmakers passed a photo ID bill that was later struck down by the Missouri Supreme Court. The court ruled that the law amounted to a “heavy and substantial burden on Missourians’ free exercise of the right of suffrage.”
Seriously? Wanna guess what the makeup was of the Missouri Supreme Court was in 2006?
According to the website for the Missouri Supreme Court, justice is non-partisan, blind. It’s dumb too. In 2006, the Missouri Supreme Court had five Democrat governor-appointed justices, and two appointed by Republicans.
Here’s the wrap:
Black people, young people, old people, gay people, disabled people, and all other “victims” should be tired of being used as an excuse for Democrats to steal elections and ultimately the treasury. Democrats like Nixon know that 100% participation in anything is not possible, yet they demonize the impossible and blame Republicans.
Ask yourself what you must show valid photo identification for, and you can clearly see why this veto is nonsense. You can’t rent a car or cash a check without a valid form of picture ID. You can’t get a fishing license without a photo ID. But the ability to alter life as we know it in America can be done with a utility bill?
Democrats want America to run like other Utopias, say Cuba and Mexico. After all these countries are running so well that Democrats have allowed shrines to them on American soil.
Miami is the U.S. version of Cuba, settled by illegal immigrants who left their Motherland. As for Mexico, we have built many shrines honoring the Mexicans reacquisition of sovereign United States: California, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Texas are all tributes to Aztlan. Is Missouri next?
It will take more than the Mexican vote or the voting dead to carry “McLovin” Nixon to victory in 2012. Missourians, like the rest of America are not stupid. Maybe Nixon will have better luck running for governor in Mexico City.
That’s my rant!
© 2011 Kevin Jackson – The Black Sphere, LLC – All Rights Reserved.
 I’m guessing that “white, middle-class and middle-aged voters” tend to vote Republican?
 The predominantly black area of St. Louis City 37.7% voter turnout in the November 2010 election. In 2008 St. Louis City had a 61.71% voter turnout, higher by double-digits than any area in the state in 2010. Black people in St. Louis just decided not to vote in 2010, and were in no way disenfranchised.
If you like what you read here, then SIGN-UP to get our posts sent directly to your INBOX! We promise to provide information, insight, and a few chuckles. Also, YOU will be supporting a FEARLESS CONSERVATIVE WARRIOR!