Cancer By Another Name Would Smell As Sweet

Cancer

CancerObamaCare is so sinister, it’s actually fun to peel back the layers. The most recent proposal by the people who brought us ObamaCare: redefine cancer.

The definition of cancer for me is “Liberal.”

And this story only reinforces why I find Liberals so scurrilous. As reported by Forbes:

On July 29, 2013, a working group for the National Cancer Institute (the main government agency for cancer research) published a paper proposing that the term “cancer” be reserved for lesions with a reasonable likelihood of killing the patient if left untreated.

Slower growing tumors would be called a different name such as “indolent lesions of epithelial origin” (IDLE). Their justification was that modern medical technology now allows doctors to detect small, slow-growing tumors that likely wouldn’t be fatal.

Trending: Trump’s ‘Elevator Tape’ and the Mueller Investigation

The government knows that “cancer” is a buzzword that sends a person into a tizzy. Yes, even in the country with the greatest doctors in the world patients never want a diagnosis of malignancies. When patients hear the word “cancer,” they tend to want to LOOK INTO IT!

By redefining cancer, the Obamacare-pushing government hopes that people will just take the doctor’s word for it. Sort of a medical version of “let’s pass the bill, so we can see what’s in the bill.”

Translated: After cancer kills you, we will do the autopsy to see if it was indeed cancer that killed you.

Cancer by another name would be as deadly?

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.