Let us genuinely examine the agenda for the homosexual movement.
As I pointed out in Part One, if their agenda were merely equality, why are they so intent on putting Christian organizations out of work, as they did the baker, and the event planner, and others.
And don’t try to convince me “It is only a few radicals”. If that were true, why haven’t any LGBT groups or leaders condemned these actions. Perhaps we should do a deeper dive into the “Gay Manifesto” I mentioned in Part One:
“In your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.
All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.
Trending: Michael Avenatti Jumps on Trump Train
We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and esthetic. We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks.”
This is not a peaceful, loving movement. It is a vicious, ferocious and cruel faction. They are self-centered and ego driven. They come as non-violent diplomats; but they want to humiliate, disgrace and discredit all who do not conform to their beliefs. They have become accepted through their appearances in numerous sitcoms; but they have become feared through their appearances in Christian businesses.
Are you aware marriage is the Biblical term used for civil union? Without the Bible there would be no marriages, only civil unions. Homosexuals were able to have civil unions and were granted the same benefits as any marriage; the only difference is it would be called a civil union not a marriage. Why would they fight so vigorously to have a Biblical term when the Bible calls homosexuality an abomination (Leviticus 18:22) (Leviticus 20:13). Some would say to spit in the face of Christ and Christianity.
Would any sensible man or woman attempt to do business, especially their wedding, with someone that does not want to work with them? And as they predicted in their manifesto, the government is not only passing the laws to engender love between men; the government is helping them stab us in our cowardly hearts.