Liberals have decided to go to war. With qualifiers. It’s actually been going on for a while, but the latest casualty came at the CBS Democrat debate. When asked by John Dickerson if she agreed with Marco Rubio that we were at war with radical Islam.
Marco Rubio, also running for president, said that this attack showed– in– the attack in Paris showed that we are at war with radical Islam. Do you agree with that characterization, radical Islam?take our poll - story continues below
I don’t think we’re at war with Islam. I don’t think we at war with all Muslims. I think we’re at war with jihadists who have–
Just to interrupt, he– he didn’t say all Muslims. He just said radical Islam. Is that a phrase you don’t–
This part is pertinent.
I don’t think we’re at war with Islam. I don’t think we at war with all Muslims.
Despite Dickerson reiterating the “radical” part, Hillary Clinton doesn’t see a problem with people killing other people when they are even tangentially associated with Islam.
It’s amazing to most Americans that even if you remove chopping off heads or suicide-bombings from the tactics of Islamists, the religion still condones the mistreatment of women and gays. Apparently you can mistreat women and gays if you are tangentially associated with Islam.
I say to America, let’s all convert to Islam, so the rules no longer apply to us. If you don’t want to go cold-turkey, then simply identify as black until you decide you want to be a black Muslim and hit the PC lotto.