Dirty Tricks: Hidden Agenda of the Stein-Clinton Recount

Prev2 of 4Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

What a difference a month makes. In an ironic twist of “fake media”, Salon.com predicted correctly, save one detail. They mixed the two major candidates in their hypothesis.

take our poll - story continues below

Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?

  • Has Big Tech Gone Too Far Banning the President?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

It is obvious that Donald Trump won an overwhelming majority of the Electoral Votes 308 to Clinton’s 230.

“It’s all my fault!”(sic)—Jill Stein

Trending: Is the Inauguration CANCELLED?

Instead of accepting the loss honorably, Stein, et al have launched a recount in the rust belt swing states:  Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania.

Presidential joke Jill Stein has raised $6 million claiming “a rigged system” and “Russian hacking”. After all, she could have gotten TWO PERCENT of the vote, instead of one percent.

While Clinton supporters are holding on to their last hope to see her in the White House, the Obama administration has announced that the election was not hacked, by Russians or anyone else. 

Ms. Stein filed the Wisconsin petition just 90 minutes before the state’s 5 p.m. deadline on Nov. 25, after reports from data experts and election lawyers that a cyberattack could have manipulated the results.  They said that throughout Wisconsin, Clinton performed more poorly in counties that used voting machines than those using paper ballots.

Despite conceding the election on election night, the Clinton Campaign now backs the recount.

The Hill reports Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Erik Elias wrote:

Because we had not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology, we had not planned to exercise this option ourselves, but now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides.  But regardless of the potential to change the outcome in any of the states, we feel it is important, on principle, to ensure our campaign is legally represented in any court proceedings and represented on the ground in order to monitor the recount process itself.

Prev2 of 4Next
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

If you like what you read here, then SIGN-UP to get our posts sent directly to your INBOX! We promise to provide information, insight, and a few chuckles. Also, YOU will be supporting a FEARLESS CONSERVATIVE WARRIOR!

You Might Like