Hillary Clinton and Her History of Accepting Unethical Donations

Hillary Clinton claims to be a feminist, but I find her to be very bad at her role.

Hillary Clinton beguiles American Liberal women with her tails of adventures in protecting the softer sex. We know that’s not true, as Hillary practically served up women to her rapist husband. But if you think Hillary is bad state-side, when she’s in Muslim countries, she rolls over on women like a trained seal.

Hillary Clinton knows that women are profitable on the political black market, especially in Muslim countries.

As NY Magazine reported,

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: THEY LIED: Dam Just BROKE on FBI Handling of Clinton Investigation

The thousands of hacked Clinton campaign emails included at least one about a $1 million donation that Qatar wanted to give the Clinton Foundation in 2012 honor of Bill’s 65th birthday the previous year. Officials wanted to meet with the former president in New York to give him the check, though it’s not clear if that get-together ever happened.

But according to a new Reuters report, the Clinton Foundation confirms that it did accept the $1 million gift from Qatar in 2012, a time when Hillary Clinton was serving as U.S. Secretary of State. During her tenure, the Clinton Foundation had an agreement with the State Department to disclose any increased or new gifts from foreign government donors while Clinton acted as top diplomat.

The State Department has said previously that it has no record of any report about a 2012 contribution from Qatar. A spokesman for the Clinton Foundation told Reuters that it took the $1 million Qatari gift; however, that particular gift wasn’t a “material increase” from previous years.

We all know what Hillary Clinton will say:

“The gift showed a lapse in judgment. I apologize, and take full responsibility.”

The media will spin it as a simple oversight, and all is well in Crookedville USA.

The article continues,

The information, gleaned from the Wikileaks disclosures, doesn’t help the perception of a potential ethics issues between the Clinton State Department and the family’s foundation – though nothing has shown that donors received any political or policy favors because of contributions when Clinton was Secretary of State. The FBI reportedly began a preliminary investigation into the charity on any possible conflicts of interest, but the Justice Department held at the time that there wasn’t enough evidence to pursue a case.

Aren’t we beyond referring to these large sums of money as “donations?” These are bribes for work to be completed at a later date; like when Hillary theoretically becomes president.

Fortunately for us, that will never happen.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.