WikiLeaks Threatens to Sue CNN Who Issues Non-Apology Apology

Remember when fake news outlet CNN warned Americans that it is illegal to read the WikiLeaks emails?

And yet on all fake news outlets, aka mainstream media, they discuss the Russian hacking scandal, which WikiLeaks has abjectly denied.

Keep in mind that Wikileaks stories has 100 percent truth in reporting over a decade. Put another way, WikiLeaks has never reported a fake story in its entire existence.

I’d call the Russian hacking story debunked, under the weight of that evidence. So now CNN offered a new story.

Former Deputy Director of the CIA, Phil Mudd called Assange a “pedophile” during a CNN live segment. If Assange is a pedophile then the Ecuadoran government must be complicit, since Assange has been captive there for quite some time. Maybe ACORN is slipping in under-aged prostitutes for Assange’s guilty pleasures?

As stated on the Sean Hannity website:

The comment came last week when ex-CIA Deputy Director Phil Mudd said on CNN that “there’s an effort to protect WikiLeaks (and) a pedophile who lives in the Ecuadorian embassy in London” a clear reference to Assange, who has been living in the embassy for more than 4 years.

Hours after the segment aired on CNN, WikiLeaks threatened to sue the cable news network for defamation.

Assange tweeted:

“We have issued instructions to sue CNN for defamation…Unless within 48h they air a one-hour expose of the plot.”

The apology from CNN came quickly, as Assange was about to become a wealthy captive.

They tweeted to Assange:

“An analyst on our air earlier today asserted that Julian Assange was a pedophile, and regrets saying it. In fact, CNN has no evidence to support that assertion.”

Apology accepted? Not just yet.

cnn-twetCNN couldn’t leave the statement there, where it should have remained. Instead, CNN continued their statement, alluding to the fake news charges of sexual assault being waged against Assange.

Leave it to the Leftists to apologize by not apologizing. CNN knows that Assange is innocent. But they won’t be “bullied.” Assange made them retract their fake news, so they will teach him a lesson.

They should have helped Assange get a Pulitzer or at the very least a now essentially worthless Nobel Peace Prize.

Perhaps the CIA has a bone to pick with Assange? Here is what ex-CIA operative, Aki Peritz wrote of Assange:

The next president of the United States is siding with Julian Assange, a man who wears his anti-Americanism proudly and acts like the textbook definition of a Russian asset, over the U.S. intelligence community – thousands of smart, patriotic people who work long hours for middling pay, some risking their lives to keep the rest of us safe.

I was once one of them, and I can only imagine how my former colleagues are feeling now. Never in our history has a U.S. president openly chosen to trust the word of a foreign adversary ahead of his own analysis.
Sounds like professional jealousy to me.
Why should President Trump believe Obama’s CIA? They’ve missed the mark so often, it’s like watching Ray Charles throw knives.
In the CIA you are told to question everything, trust nobody.
Given that advice, I’d go with the organization that gets it right 100 percent of the time, at least in choosing what I would believe about leaked emails.



Back to top button