Hollyweirdos Encourage Liberal Berkeley Rioters to Continue Violence against Conservatives.
Twitter was abuzz last night with Hollyweirdos threatening President Donald Trump and his supporters. Among them was comedic hack, and hairy-chested Sarah Silverman, who called for a military coup against the President.
According to Fox News, the comedian tweeted her message amid violent riots that broke out at UC Berkeley, over Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos’ now-canceled speech on campus.
Threatening the President and His Supporters
Silverman’s tweet reads:
Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?
Silverman was not alone, as Fox News reported that other Hollyweirdos encouraged continued violence against conservatives as well, including Director Judd Apatow, who threatened that future violence was on the way.
Apatow’s now-deleted tweet warned,
Breitbart reported that Apatow’s tweet was posted,
“…after far-left ‘anti-fascist’ rioters assaulted numerous attendees, started fires, smashed up shops and ATMs, and attacked people’s cars at Breitbart Senior Editor MILO’s UC Berkeley show on Wednesday.”
Following severe backlash, Apatow deleted his tweet, and posted a second tweet:
“I never support violence. I do support peaceful protest against hateful people and awful ideas.”
In the world of make-believe, the left pretend not to say what they say.
Other leftists who chimed in, include filmmaker Lexi Alexander. He used Twitter to encourage liberal Berkeley rioters to commit violence against conservative Trump supporters. As if he really needed to encourage that.
Alexander’s first tweet told followers to “Punch Nazis. Riot when your college invites a Nazi. Set it all on fire.”
Ironically, her her second tweet stated: “Hate Speech is not free speech.”said, “Hate speech is not free speech.”Punch Nazis. Riot when your college invites a Nazi. Set it all on fire.” Ironically, her Punch Nazis. Riot when your college invites a Nazi. Set it all on fire.” Ironically, Punch Nazis. Riot when your college invites a Nazi. Set it all on fire.” Ironically, her
Apparently, Hollyweirdos think that inciting violence is not hate speech. Although it is against the law.
Educate Yourselves, Lawless Snowflakes
According to Cornell University, 18 U.S. Code § 871 declares that threatening the President, Vice President, President-elect, or Vice-President-elect is a crime punishable by a fine or imprisonment.
The NY Times reported that Supreme Court decisions held that free speech protections under the First Amendment do not extend to speech intended and likely to cause imminent violence.
In the midst of last night’s Berkeley riots, these Hollyweirdos were egging on the protesters to continue committing crimes against people and property, in order to “win” a political argument.
Obstructing political opponents from exercising their free speech rights is against the spirit and letter of the First Amendment.
Use Your Words
Reasoned, two-sided debate, anyone? I wonder if liberals will ever grasp the fact that their violent behavior and threats of further violence against conservatives is only working to secure Trump’s reelection. (Save the Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2020.)
Dear Liberal Wacko:
When you’re angry that someone who disagrees with you is coming to your area, there are several legal options at your disposal:
One: Protest peacefully. That does NOT mean setting fires, destroying private property or businesses, or assaulting those with whom you disagree. It does mean gathering your fellow liberals together and taking a walk with protest signs, signing Kum Ba Yah, or even chanting.
Two: Attend the speech, listen to what the speaker has to say, and then use your words to respond with reasoned opposition.
Three: Boycott the event and encourage fellow snowflakes to do the same. You don’t need to fill your head with all that conservative rhetoric. Have surf day instead. Take a road trip to San Fran and visit Fisherman’s Wharf. Walk up and down all those steep hills to get out your aggression.
But don’t, for one minute, think that committing violence against those with whom you politically disagree is in any way an acceptable form of free speech. Violent political opposition is not free speech; it’s terrorism. And you will be arrested for it.