Investigation Backfires: Democrats Accidentally Expose Obama
Leftist Democrats opened Pandora’s box. And you thought karma is a bitch?
Now, Obama and his administration find themselves in harm’s way.
Leftists clearly didn’t plan their attack very carefully. Leftist rarely play out their scenarios to the bloody bitter end. And that’s why their own witch hunt has put Obama in hot water.
Comey’s testimony validated one of the real culprits in the electioneering of which Trump and the Russians said occurred. Now, it’s time to pay the piper.
Should Congress Remove Biden from Office?
Trending: Biden’s latest grades: D- and F
According to Breitbart:
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) sent a letter to Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, formally requesting that the committee probe any attempts to influence the FBI’s investigations under the Trump and Obama administrations.
Comey Spilled the Beans:
Comey wanted to throw shade at Trump. However, that didn’t work. The real question remains as to why Comey implicated the black chick.
Was it intentional?
Comey typically covers for Democrats, at least the white ones. Yet, he put Lynch on “front street.”
The public testimony forces the Senate to dig deeper. What is the extent of Lynch’s obstruction? Was Obama involved? Of course he was, but it’s time to prove it. Not only would his legacy crash and burn, but charges could be filed.
Now we learn that John Podesta will testify. Will Susan Rice be next?
What exactly is happening behind the scenes of the Trump administration? I surmise there is no way President Trump sits idly by as the Left attack him. Surely he has a strategy built around his new people, and what they uncover.
What’s Trump waiting on?
Certainly charges should have been filed long ago Lynch, Hillary Clinton, and the DNC.
Experts believe that Lynch’s actions could have been orchestrated by the former president or his team. It would be unlikely for an attorney general to make this kind of move without the White House approval. Especially when the third person involved is someone who’s running for president.
This whole saga could lead to a separate criminal investigation and even the naming of another special counsel. Analysts believe this situation could be extremely beneficial to President Trump. It would divert the attention from his legal issues and it would undermine the Democrat’s credibility.
Untangling the Mess. Here’s what we know.
Lynch ordered Comey to mislead the public, downplaying the Clinton investigation.
Further, Lynch refused to recuse herself only after Comey learned of her secret meeting with Bill Clinton. During that meeting, Bill Clinton apparently brokered a deal to save his wife. All of this happened one week before the FBI was set to interview Hillary.
Meanwhile, Obama desperately tried to pretend he wasn’t part of the scandal. But his denial is just more liberal lip service.
As Conservative Daily reports:
Soon after Bill Clinton’s meeting with Lynch, the Obama White House postured to explain it through press secretary John Earrnest. While he felt the need to reiterate the President’s stated commitment to avoiding any kind of interference in Justice Department investigations, many believe this was the only opportunity where Obama could have indirectly showed his involvement.
Far from sticking to the “no interference” narrative, [Earnest glorified] Obama’s position on the incident. This is a strategy that many leaders use to erase their involvement from a sensitive event.
Additionally, Comey claims he asked for a special counsel to look into Lynch’s conflict of interest. However, Comey shut down the probe. So we get a story where the actions don’t match the words. Typical leftism. Say one thing, do another.
Lynch promised the Clinton campaign she would keep FBI agents in check.
Emerging facts implicate more and more democrats.
Media outlets reported that congressional sources are convinced that Lynch will be called to answer Comey’s allegations under oath. Also on the potential witness list are Wasserman and Amanda Renteria, who was the senior Clinton campaign staffer.
Considering the facts, it’s really difficult to believe that Obama didn’t play a role in this operation. Especially when everyone knows how powerful his influence and leadership within the Democratic Party was, and possibly still is.
And then there is the Special Counsel.
I wrote of Mueller recently,
One of the most asked questions I get these days surrounds Special Counsel Mueller.
I warned that the man is in no way unbiased in his politics. Moreover, he’s anti-Trump. And, he picks anti-Trumpers to his staff.
So why is the White House not concerned?
Like Comey, Mueller has been given bi-partisan and almost universal praise. Given my knowledge of DC, the praise made me immediately skeptical of the man. The more I have learned, the more I believe my instincts were correct.
Yet, President Trump seems rather nonchalant about the whole thing.
If we were only talking about Mueller, perhaps the rancor would end. However, it seems that with each addition to Mueller’s team, we get another anti-Trumper.
If we’ve learned anything about Trump, we know he’s a pretty good poker player.
And what of “he said, she said”?
The Democrats don’t seem to be in as close communication as they have been in the past.
Recently Jeh Johnson testified before Congress. And like former FBI Director Comey, Johnson dropped a few bombshells of his own, as we documented.
Apparently, when it comes to the Russian hacking, Jeh Johnson has some explaining to do.
The former Homeland Security Secretary testified before Congress and left a wave of new questions.
Johnson did clear up one little matter.
“To my current knowledge, the Russian government did not through any cyber intrusion alter ballots, ballot counts or reporting of election results,” he said during his opening statement.
Unfortunately, that’s the only clarification we can take from Jeh Johnson’s testimony. His Obama-style statements created more unanswered questions.
However, Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz says Johnson lied under oath during his testimony.
Let’s see how this all shakes out in the court of public opinion, and with the all pro-Hillary Clinton Special Counsel and his staffers.
If you like what you read here, then SIGN-UP to get our posts sent directly to your INBOX! We promise to provide information, insight, and a few chuckles. Also, YOU will be supporting a FEARLESS CONSERVATIVE WARRIOR!