Trump Policy Has Democrats Seeing Ghosts
Leftists have a knack for possessing clouded vision. And this latest case would be shocking, if one didn’t know that Leftist are bat crap crazy.
Leftists see racism, sexism, and other “isms” everywhere, so why shouldn’t the chemistry of the forest be linked to skewed interpretation?
As Breitbart reports one Leftist says “ghost forests” plague America, up and down the Atlantic seaboard.
“I think ghost forests are the most obvious indicator of climate change anywhere on the Eastern coast of the U.S.,” said Matthew Kirwan, a professor at Virginia Institute of Marine Science who studies ghost forests. “It was dry, usable land 50 years ago; now it’s marshes with dead stumps and dead trees.”
Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?
However, leftists are ignoring one crucial fact.
Ghost forests aren’t new.
In fact, there is a forest of dead trees standing on the Copalis River in Washington. It was caused by an earthquake in the Pacific ocean that sent a tsunami to Japan in 1700. It took scientists years to decipher Native American writings and other records in order to make sense of the events that occurred. However, they finally pieced together the history of the haunting forest.
As scientists have learned, ghost forests occur where changes in sea level happen.
Although the process has “occurred naturally for thousands of years,” some say it has accelerated in recent decades due to polar ice melts and rising sea levels, which would push salt water further inland, killing trees in the process.
In past months, “global warming” has been blamed for everything from the death of migratory songbirds to the decimation of herds of reindeer to a slump in South American coffee production to a drop in the population of Hawaiian monk seals and even — remarkably — to colder winters.
Yet as the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has noted, many of the recent climatological events and trends “can be explained by the natural variability of the climate system,” without excluding an indeterminate influence from atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. In the same report, the WMO said that, at this time, researchers have not yet been able to ascertain “the respective roles being played by climate variability and human-induced climate change.”
Practically every global warming “woe be us” theory proposed by these extortionists has been debunked by TIME!
That’s right, time!
Forget the fancy data and data models, because once the global climate change alarmists make their predictions, all you have to do is wait.
Al Gore likely underestimated just how far this hoax would go. But it took off, because lies are a lot easier to sell than the truth.
So just tell people that we are destroying the planet, and those who are jump on board. Add fire and brimstone speeches, and hype what’s been happening for decades, ergo weather, and voila. You get a license to steal.
As we previously reported, Obama wasted billions on the climate farce.
There was nearly $80 million he tucked away in different funds throughout the government. Further, more than $150 Billion was wasted on green energy scams.
Who knows how much money Obama would have given to the new “ghosts” of climate farce?
Here is an article that references the science of global climate farce. It’s titled, 9 ways we know humans triggered climate change. See how many lies you spot.
The research falls into nine independently studied, but physically related, lines of evidence:
1. Simple chemistry – when we burn carbon-based materials, carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted (research beginning in 1900s)
2. Basic accounting of what we burn, and therefore how much CO2 we emit (data collection beginning in 1970s)
3. Measuring CO2 in the atmosphere and trapped in ice to find that it is increasing and that the levels are higher than anything we’ve seen in hundreds of thousands of years (measurements beginning in 1950s)
4. Chemical analysis of the atmospheric CO2 that reveals the increase is coming from burning fossil fuels (research beginning in 1950s)
5. Basic physics that shows us that CO2 absorbs heat (research beginning in 1820s)
6. Monitoring climate conditions to find that recent warming of the Earth is correlated to and follows rising CO2 emissions (research beginning in 1930s)
7. Ruling out natural factors that can influence climate like the sun and ocean cycles (research beginning in 1830s)
8. Employing computer models to run experiments of natural versus human-influenced simulations of Earth (research beginning in 1960s)
9. Consensus among scientists who consider all previous lines of evidence and make their own conclusions (polling beginning in 1990s)
Let me help you explore the lies:
All data collection began when Leftists took almost complete charge of government, except that 1900s reference to burning carbon. That was the first clue that everything else would be nonsense. FACT: people breath. Breathing releases CO2. Great. But CO2 feed the plants.
Practically every one of these studies has either been completely debunked, or present data trends dramatically different. The “proof” consists of modeling and research, flawed research with no proven causation.
I love #7, as they say, “Ruling out natural factors”. Natural factors have the largest impact on CO2 production. Note there was no mention of volcanoes, where a mere burp of an eruption releases more CO2 than man produces in a year.
Most of these studies were done without the aid of supercomputer modeling. These new models have rendered the previous research completely useless, unless you are set on the false narrative of “humans triggered climate change”. Seriously, compare the computers of the 60s with those of today, and tell me which you trust on climate modeling.
In as much as a fart in America can be smelled in Russia, such is the impact of man on the climate. The Left know his, which is why they press for radical change as quickly as possible.
Finally, the world gets sanity back, when it comes to this silly issue.