NSA: FBI Comey REJECTED Offer for Clinton Emails
More proof confirms that Comey committed fraud during the Clinton investigation. Check out this latest development.
Remember the “lost” emails from Clinton’s private server? I argued at the time that there is no way on Gore’s green earth that emails get “lost”. And I was right.
The NSA had the emails, as they have all of ours. Interestingly, former FBI Director James Comey didn’t want to hear about the “lost” emails.
According to the New York Post:
There’s a lot going on in the Hillary Clinton/Donald Trump/Russia investigation that all the highfalutin’ newspapers that cover politics are still trying to ignore.
Well, investors had better know this stuff before it bites them in the assets. So here goes.
Numerous reports coming out of the Senate Judiciary Committee last week said that former FBI Director James Comey made the decision not to refer Clinton for prosecution long before he even interviewed key witnesses, including Hillary.
Remember, the Republicans now control this committee. So bad news isn’t going to be stifled anymore.
Clinton, you probably remember, “lost” her private emails, which she’d been storing on a personal computer server. Comey chastised her harshly in a televised speech but then said there was a unanimous decision not to recommend prosecution.
Clinton’s emails, which were stolen by the Russians, have never been found. But as I’ve mentioned numerous times, the messages are still in the possession of the National Security Agency (NSA), which offered to give them to the FBI.
Comey turned down that offer, according to a source who has been very reliable.
I’m not one to rely on “reliable sources” these day, however I suspect Comey stays “on vacation” to avoid public scrutiny. Sadly for him, it won’t work forever.
Comey has more than a few skeletons, as he lied about his FBI g-men unanimously decreeing Hillary Clinton’s innocence. As we’ve begun to learn, many FBI agents disagreed with the decision not to prosecute.
Add to this the recent discovery of a memo written by Comey preemptively declared Clinton innocent of wrongdoing in the handling of classified information in EmailGate.
And what of the infamous meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac?
TBS wrote at the time,
The ACLJ poured over documents connected to the tarmac meeting, shockingly, former FBI Director James Comey lied.
“We have just obtained hundreds of pages in our ongoing investigation and federal lawsuit on former Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton while the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI had an ongoing criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails,” says a new report from officials with the American Center for Law and Justice.
“The results are shocking.”
“First, the Comey FBI lied to us. Last July, we sent FOIA requests to both the Comey FBI and the Lynch DOJ asking for any documents related to the Clinton Lynch plane meeting. The FBI, under the then directorship of James Comey, quickly replied that ‘No records responsive to your request were located.’”
However, from records that now have become available, “It is clear that there were multiple records within the FBI responsive to our request and that discussions regarding the surreptitious meeting between then AG Lynch and the husband of the subject of an ongoing FBI criminal investigation reached the highest levels of the FBI,” the ACLJ reported.”
Interestingly, documents existed regarding the infamous meeting, where Lynch and Clinton struck a deal.
Only a moron would believe that Comey, as they say ‘acted alone’. Comey conspired with many in his political jihad against the American’s public’s sensibilities.
These types of decisions need lots of orchestration, as well as sanction from on high.
Comey has always played the role of “cleaner” for the Democrats, but always at the behest of overseers. In this case, the overseer was likely Barack Obama.
National Review agrees:
Let’s think about what else was going on in April 2016. I’ve written about it a number of times over the last year-plus, such as in a column a few months back: On April 10, 2016, President Obama publicly stated that Hillary Clinton had shown “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the [criminal statutes relevant to her e-mail scandal]). The president acknowledged that classified information had been transmitted via Secretary Clinton’s server, but he suggested that, in the greater scheme of things, its importance had been vastly overstated.
This is precisely the reasoning that Comey relied on in ultimately absolving Clinton, as I recounted in the same column: On July 5, 2016, FBI director James Comey publicly stated that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in using a private email server to handle classified information, but he insisted that she had not intended to endanger national security (which is not an element of the relevant criminal statute).
Comey conveniently used Obama’s talking points when discussing all the reasons he could not conclude “intent” in Clinton’s mishandling of classified information.
He interestingly ignored the fact that intent was not necessary in an indictment against her. Given the number of infractions committed by Clinton and her team, ignoring these facts suggests a cover-up.
Perhaps Comey covered for Obama as well?
Barack Obama claimed he had no knowledge of Clinton’s private server. However, emails discovered proved otherwise, as he corresponded repeatedly with the then-Secretary of State on her non-secure private server.
Comey needs to fess up. It’s only a matter of time before one of the swamp creatures turns “state’s evidence” against these crooks.