Please disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.

Tired of Facebook censorship? Join Tea Party Community.

New Democrat Strategy to Destroy President Trump

The Left pretends the Obama administration remained “scandal free”.

So no veterans died on waiting lists at the VA? And of course, despite finding U.S. assault weapons in Mexico that pointed back to the Obama administration, our government participated in no such program.

Since nobody went to jail over destroyed and “lost” data, we now know that the IRS didn’t discriminate against Conservatives.

Hundreds of millions of dollars in cash air-dropped into Iran, but nothing to see there. As Obama explained it, “Iran doesn’t have a bank we can deal with.”

By now, we all know that Hillary Clinton is purer than an Amish baby, and implicated in NO scandal, including that Benghazi “witch hunt” by the Republicans. To hear the Left explain Benghazi, one has to wonder if anybody even died.

But when it comes to President Trump, everything is a scandal for the Left. Though we have few details of the attack that killed 4 Army special forces members, the president is under attack. CNN reported the following:

“The Pentagon is still looking at the exact circumstances of how and when Johnson became separated from the 12-member team as they were ambushed by 50 ISIS fighters. The FBI is assisting in the investigation of the ambush.”

“This might wind up to be Mr. Trump’s Benghazi,” Rep. Frederica Wilson said on CNN’s “New Day” on Wednesday. “He needs to investigate this very, very closely because I will be making sure that Congress does that.”

As Americans, I think we can all agree that what happened in Niger needs to be investigated. We need to do whatever it takes to protect our troops. That certainly wasn’t what Hillary Clinton’s State Department cared about.

Obama and Clinton willfully neglected the people trapped in Benghazi. And had it not been for a few brave men, more people would have died.

Witnesses have recently come forward saying that the State Department under Obama went outside of usual U.S security hiring a foreign company to secure U.S Soldiers. The men hired to protect U.S Soldiers were the same ones who helped kill them in Benghazi.

Fox News reports:

“The guards who were hired were locals who were part of the Ansar al-Sharia and Al Qaeda groups operating in Benghazi,” said the source, whose assignment in Benghazi had ended in November 2011. “Whoever approved contracts at the State Department hired Blue Mountain Group and then allowed Blue Mountain Group to hire local Libyans who were not vetted.”

“Many of the local Libyans who attacked the consulate on the night of Sept. 11, 2012, were the actual guards that the State Department under Hillary Clinton hired to protect the Consulate in Benghazi,” Tiegen told Fox News. “The guards were unvetted and were locals with basically no background at all in providing security. Most of them never had held a job in security in the past.

Think about this for a minute. Hillary Clinton actually hired the very people who, along with their jihadist allies in Benghazi, attacked and killed U.S. soldiers.

And if we can believe WikiLeaks (and we can), somebody at the level of Clinton or Obama gave an order for support troops to stand down.

We documented  the email earlier this year:

“The Clinton email in question explained to Podesta that a handful of lives were a small price to pay to maintain U.S. weapons deals with the Lebanese that flowed through Kurdistan and Caledonia:

“Document Number 1254869 clearly shows that Clinton advised Podesta of their intent to have the U.S. military, which was only 3 miles from the consulate when the attack happened, stay put and offer no help. ‘The CIA will get their own people out’ the forward commanders were told.”

Clinton’s email also alludes to Obama deferring judgment to Clinton. He told his secretary of state to do “whatever she thought was best” to protect U.S. weapons deals with Former Libyan Prime Minister Muammar Gaddafi from being transferred into German hands.”

One other quick point. I don’t think President Trump blamed the Niger attack on a YouTube video.

I’d love to see President Trump tweet out about Niger: What difference does it make? To challenge the Left to remember one of America’s greatest failures is a good thing. We don’t need another Benghazi.

And you can bet that Niger certainly isn’t one. The mere allegation is meant to shift media cycles from real scandals, like Uranium One, to nonsense.

I do have one final point: if Benghazi isn’t a scandal, how can Niger be “Trump’s Benghazi”?



Send this to a friend