
Elizabeth Warren Implies Senator Kirsten Gillibrand is a Slut
The Left finally devised a plan, and it involves a Senator Kirsten Gillibrand from New York.
I call the strategy, Hillary Clinton 2.0: Only this time without the rapist husband.
Gillbrand has been credited with ousting Senator Al Franken. She’s also said to have taken on men on colleges and universities, and has a few scalps on the wall herself.
So now the Left tout Gillibrand as the new “Champion of Women’s Rights”. They gladly hand her the baton now that the old champion, Hillary Clinton has been found to be anything but.
As the Left learned, it’s difficult to sell Hillary Clinton as a champion of women’s rights when she’s married to a man who violates women regularly. And then there are those pesky accusations that Hillary Clinton may have held a couple of women down, as Bill Clinton had his way with them.
So the new Democrat strategy of “Better. Better. Better!” means “out with the old, in with the new”.
Ironically, this means Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren is out. I suspect so is Kamala “I’m even dumber than Hank Johnson” Harris may be out as well.
So now a fresher, whiter, cleaner Hillary Clinton emerged to take on Donald Trump.
Donald Trump tweeted this of Gillibrand:
Lightweight Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a total flunky for Chuck Schumer and someone who would come to my office “begging” for campaign contributions not so long ago (and would do anything for them), is now in the ring fighting against Trump. Very disloyal to Bill & Crooked-USED!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2017
I love how President Trump has history with all these lecherous Leftists. He leaves them little wiggle room.
And the innuendo of (and would do anything for them) is…PRICELESS.
But Gillibrand fired back in a tweet:
You cannot silence me or the millions of women who have gotten off the sidelines to speak out about the unfitness and shame you have brought to the Oval Office. https://t.co/UbQZqubXZv
— Kirsten Gillibrand (@SenGillibrand) December 12, 2017
Silence what?
This is the strategy the Left chooses to go after the best first-year president in history?
We recently chronicled Megyn Kelly’s embarrassing show about these women.
Kelly showcased three women who have allegedly been sexually harassed by Donald Trump. Jessica Leeds, Samantha Holvey and Rachel Cooks told Megyn Kelly that they were shocked when President Trump was elected in 2016 following a string of sexual misconduct allegations that spanned years.
Listen as one of Donald Trump’s accusers explains her sordid encounter with Trump.
https://twitter.com/RealMAGASteve/status/940390464456454144?s=03
That’s right, a single billionaire business mogul asked for her phone number. {cue music}
Because Lord knows that Donald Trump wouldn’t outright ask her out, as he’s too shy. He would need to do so through inuendo or the “modeling” ruse.
The real story is how Kelly sat there with a straight face, as this woman revealed her “encounter” with Donald Trump.
Pocahontas was quick to weigh in. And her comments are interesting, as she implies Gillibrand is a slut.
Are you really trying to bully, intimidate and slut-shame @SenGillibrand? Do you know who you're picking a fight with? Good luck with that, @realDonaldTrump. Nevertheless, #shepersisted. https://t.co/mYJtBZfxiu
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) December 12, 2017
President Trump set the bait, and Warren sprung the trap. GOTCHA!
The self-proclaimed “nasty woman” went right for the innuendo, and deems Gillibrand a slut.
You can’t slut-shame, unless there is a slut, right? I don’t have a “Nasty Girl Handbook”, so educate me.
I couldn’t help myself, and decided to involve myself a bit.
Get your new but slimier, "Hillary Clinton v2.0" Still nasty, but without the baggage of a rapist husband! Back on the shelf post-election 2020! #TeamKJ https://t.co/NaSFIiHZRS
— Kevin Jackson (@KevinJacksonTBS) December 12, 2017
According to Instapundit, Gillibrand is willing to say or do anything to get elected, even lie.
https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/940594139900645377
Would you like me to tell you how this strategy will play out?
Or would you prefer to just watch it fail on your own?