Scumbag Leftist Lawyer SOUGHT DONORS to PAY TRUMP ACCUSERS

Scumbag Leftist Lawyer SOUGHT DONORS to PAY TRUMP ACCUSERS

Unfortunately most Americans would not be surprised to learn that prominent Democrats colluded to taint Donald Trump.

They were moderately successful, except for the fact that Trump doesn’t give a crap about their unfounded allegations. I’m not sure others could have withstood the onslaught.

Simple strategy: accuse Trump of womanizing with one woman. Then slowly add to the number. One, then six, next 20. Surely the people will believe a good-looking billionaire needs to resort to coercion to get women.

Believe it or not, that was the plan. All the Left needed were the women. Unfortunately for the Left, the women didn’t exist.

But reality is not a problem for Leftists.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Did Kavanaugh Accuser Send SAME Letter About Gorsuch

We know there are plenty of scoundrels willing to step up for the right price. And according to The Hill reported, the Democrats put together a nice comp package.

A well-known women’s rights lawyer sought to arrange compensation from donors and tabloid media outlets for women who made or considered making sexual misconduct allegations against Donald Trump during the final months of the 2016 presidential race, according to documents and interviews.

California lawyer Lisa Bloom’s efforts included offering to sell alleged victims’ stories to TV outlets in return for a commission for herself, arranging a donor to pay off one Trump accuser’s mortgage and attempting to secure a six-figure payment for another woman who ultimately declined to come forward after being offered as much as $750,000, the clients told The Hill.

The women’s accounts were chronicled in contemporaneous contractual documents, emails and text messages reviewed by The Hill, including an exchange of texts between one woman and Bloom that suggested political action committees supporting Hillary Clinton were contacted during the effort.

Bloom, who has assisted dozens of women in prominent harassment cases and also defended film executive Harvey Weinstein earlier this year, represented four women considering making accusations against Trump last year. Two went public, and two declined.

In a statement to The Hill, Bloom acknowledged she engaged in discussions to secure donations for women who made or considered making accusations against Trump before last year’s election.

“Donors reached out to my firm directly to help some of the women I represented,” said Bloom, whose clients have also included accusers of Bill Cosby and Bill O’Reilly.

Pay for play, ambulance-chaser style.

Since when are political donors leveraged to pay legal fees for such nonsense? When the fate of the free world is at stake, Silly! And Trump’s election would change the fate of the free world.

The article continues,

Bloom said her goal in securing money was not to pressure the women to come forward, but rather to help them relocate or arrange security if they felt unsafe during the waning days of a vitriolic election. She declined to identify any of the donors.

Anybody want to bet these donors were ALL, as in 100 percent Hillary Clinton donors?

Interestingly, Bloom had one other ace in the hole in terms of her payments.

And while she noted she represented sexual harassment victims for free or at reduced rates, she also acknowledged a standard part of her contracts required women to pay her commissions as high as 33 percent if she sold their stories to media outlets.

“Our standard pro bono agreement for legal services provides that if a media entity offers to compensate a client for sharing his or her story we receive a percentage of those fees. This rarely happens. But, on occasion, a case generates media interest and sometimes (not always) a client may receive an appearance fee,” she said.

“As a private law firm we have significant payroll, rent, taxes, insurance and other expenses every week, so an arrangement where we might receive some compensation to defray our costs seems reasonable to us and is agreed to by our clients,” Bloom added.

Gotta pay those bills, huh?

Accusing innocent men pays well, I suspect. Anybody want to consider the cost to the men? Or do we just concede that men had it good long enough, and now it’s time to pay, regardless.

Final point on what you already know,

Bloom told The Hill she had no contact with Clinton or her campaign, but declined to address any contacts with super PACs that supported the Democratic presidential nominee.

There’s gold in “dem dar shills”.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.