FLASHBACK: Adam Schiff Changes His Tune Before and After He Reviews FISA Docs Proving Abuse (VIDEO)

FLASHBACK: Adam Schiff Changes His Tune Before and After He Reviews FISA Docs Proving Abuse (VIDEO)

The Democrats can’t bare the thought that they lost an election they worked so hard to rig for their benefit.

So, they push their fake narrative that they lost due to Trump colluding with the Russians for the presidency to ease the blow.

And Adam Schiff has pushed this fake narrative perhaps more than any other Democrat.

This interview is damning enough on Schiff, as he repeats what we now know is fake news. But he didn’t stop there.

In other multiple interviews Adam pretended to want to get to the bottom of Russian collusion within the Trump campaign.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: The Female Obama: Britain Votes on NO CONFIDENCE

He had this to say on CNN:

“They’ve used hacking. They’ve used dumping. They’ve used paid media trolls. Some of those devices, we know they used here. Others we need to investigate,” Schiff contended.

And he said this on MSNBC:

“I can tell you that the case is more than that,” Schiff told Chuck Todd on MSNBC. “And I can’t go into the particulars, but there is more than circumstantial evidence now.”

But now, the FISA abuse memo hangs in the balance of being released to the public which will completely squash the fake narrative Schiff and others have been pushing for so long.

President Trump Complained

Shortly after being sworn into the White House president Trump made the shocking statement that the Obama administration wiretapped Trump Tower and was listening in on conversations.

Chairman Devin Nuñes (R-CA) investigated these claims. In January, Nuñes first learned about the unmasking controversy. At that time, two sources in the intelligence community approached him.

They named the person responsible to Nuñes, along with at least one Trump team name that was inappropriately unmasked. They also gave Nuñes reference numbers for documented proof of the unmasking. But, intelligence agencies stonewalled the House Intel chair when he asked to see the reports in question.

Nuñes then briefed the President on the information in the intelligence reports before meeting with the Intelligence Committee. Hence, Donald Trump’s tweet on the matter.

We wrote about Nuñes’ press conference at the time:

More damning is the fact that citizens affiliated with Trump’s team who were unmasked were not, I repeat NOT associated with any intelligence about Russia or other foreign intelligence.

This is a despicable political power play by Obama to ensure either the ascendancy of Hillary to the White House, or the total interference of an incoming president’s administration.

The initial, seemingly illegal unmasking led to other surveillance, causing other private citizens being wrongly unmasked as well.

“Unmasking is not unprecedented, but unmasking for political purposes … specifically of Trump transition team members … is highly suspect and questionable,” an intelligence source told Fox News. “Opposition by some in the intelligence agencies who were very connected to the Obama and Clinton teams was strong. After Trump was elected, they decided they were going to ruin his presidency by picking them off one by one.”

Of course the Democrats immediately shot down these claims as “false”.

First among them was Adam Schiff who appeared on many left leaning news outlets calling the president a liar:

“We must accept the possibility that the president does not know fact from fiction, right from wrong, that wild claims are not strategic but worse.

Schiff wrote that after the president made a claim with no evidence.”

But in March on 2017 after Schiff reviewed the Fisa abuse documents that Nuñes was investigating, he changed his tune on the wiretapping claims when giving interviews.

He began saying “he couldn’t offer additional details” on what was in the documents Nuñes was previously investigating.

Who’s the REAL Liar?

The reason why this information is so significant is because we now know that Schiff reviewed and was aware of this bombshell FISA abuse and actively stopped Nuñes from investigating.

Further, after Jeff Sessions recused himself of any pending Russia probe, Rod Rosenstein then came in as Deputy AG and former FBI Director Robert Mueller was subsequently appointed Special Counsel to oversee the Russia investigation on May 17th, 2016.

Additionally, if Schiff was honest and allowed Chairman Nuñes to release the information he had about the FISA abuse and illegal unmasking back in March or April of 2016, Robert Mueller would never have been appointed as Special Counsel to oversee the bogus Russia witch hunt.

And who are the ones that are financing this bogus Russia investigation? Taxpayers.

We have spent millions on this fake Russia story just so the Democrats can feel better about their failed attempt to elect Hillary Clinton.

DC is not a swamp, it’s a sewer. And with the latest developments, Schiff will have a lot of explaining to do.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.