Michael Flynn Attacks: Democrats Now Must Face the Music

Michael Flynn Attacks: Democrats Now Must Face the Music

With the help of the corrupt FBI, the dirty Democrats have bullied, threatened, and even ruined lives. In their zeal to take down President Trump, the Left screwed up.

General Michael Flynn began as a victim of their evil plot. However, now he finds himself the owner of prime real-estate: Democrats’ asses.

Thanks to the FISA memo and new information that continues to shine more light on the collusion within the Democratic Party, Flynn finds himself in an interesting spot. Imagine with his attorneys ask for discovery when he decides to put his life back in order.

I expect Flynn’s next leather briefcase will be made from the hocks of Hillary Clinton.

Recently, a Stipulated Motion was filed for Protective Order “Governing Discovery” by USA as to Michael Flynn. Put another way, the Flynn team is gathering new evidence to fight the charges, as Flynn now knows he was framed.

Trending: UFC Champ Calls NBA and NFL “B*tches” for not Visiting the White House

By filing this motion, the Special Counsel has essentially asked the court to grant Flynn access to all evidence that was used against him.

Again, both Mueller and Flynn’s legal teams are in agreement on this, which will allow for the sharing of information with anyone directly involved in the case.

This Motion comes just days after James Comey told Congress he didn’t think Flynn had lied.

According to two sources familiar with the meetings, Comey told lawmakers that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe that Flynn had lied to them, or that any inaccuracies in his answers were intentional. As a result, some of those in attendance came away with the impression that Flynn would not be charged with a crime pertaining to the Jan. 24 interview.

Nine months later, with Comey gone and special counsel Robert Mueller in charge of the Trump-Russia investigation, Flynn pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements to the FBI in that Jan. 24 questioning.

What happened? With Flynn awaiting sentencing — that was recently delayed until at least May — some lawmakers are trying to figure out what occurred between the time Comey told Congress the FBI did not believe Flynn lied and the time, several months later, when Flynn pleaded guilty to just that.

I don’t know how a 3-star general gets tricked by the FBI, but Michael Flynn apparently did. Now we learn what most people suspected to begin with: the FBI railroaded Flynn in an effort to get dirt on President Trump.

Who knows what threats were made to Flynn? Did they threaten his family? Friends?

But the Democrats plan backfired as it’s been almost a year and Flynn hasn’t given up any dirt on Trump. Because there is none. And now thanks to this new motion filed by Flynn’s lawyers hopefully we will learn more about how the FBI tricked Flynn.

Perhaps one of the most interesting things that we all are anxious to learn is who issued a FISA warrant to illegally unmask General Flynn.

As reported by Dick Morris who wrote:

According to “two sources familiar with the material that underlies the Memo published by the House Intelligence Committee on Friday” (and printed in the blog Offended America), the judge — Rudolph Contreras — who granted the warrant in the FISA Court to wiretap Carter Page, was removed from presiding over he case of Mike Flynn, Trump’s former national security advisor.

While it is not uncommon for a judge to recuse himself from a case due to conflicts of some sort, it is very unusual for a judge to be recused from a case by his judicial supervisors.

The wording of the District Court’s announcement that Contraras “was recused” suggests that it was not his decision to remove him from control of the Flynn case.

Since the case against Mike Flynn may well rest, in part, on information gleaned from wiretaps authorized by FISA warrants, it is easy to understand why Contraras’ superiors might have made the decision to take him off the case.

But given how unusual it is for a judge to be removed from a case, rather than leave voluntarily, the public has a right to know why he was recused.

Conveniently, Rudolph Contreras was just one of the many judges Obama appointed to the FISA courts.

This raises many questions like how many of these judges signed off on unmasking Americans. Was Contreras complicit in working with the crooked Obama administration in getting these bogus FISA warrants?

Soon their games will come to an end. And so will the fake Russia investigation into the Trump administration.

Needless to say, this news doesn’t bode well for the FBI or the Democrats in general. Democrats have no shame in the way they have treated private American citizens, Flynn, and our rightfully elected president. And now we get yet another way to get to the truth of the Democrats’ despicable deeds.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.