America’s Dumbest Women: Hillary Clinton Voters

America’s Dumbest Women: Hillary Clinton Voters

A year plus after losing a rigged election, Hillary Clinton is still unable to cope with the loss.

Her list of excuses exhausts even her most ardent supporter. She blamed on Obama, then James Comey and the FBI. Clinton complained of sexism against her, and of course the Russians, just to name a few.

Check out the list on the graphic on the Left, and understand that Clinton used all of these excuses at one time or another.

But perhaps Clinton’s most interesting excuse stems from a question around her lack of support by women.

This question is most interesting, given that Clinton ran prominently “womanhood”. She constantly campaigned on her supposed rich history of helping women. She talked of equal pay and breaking glass ceilings. In fact, no campaign in history relied more on gender-based rhetoric.

When asked by Fortune what she thought about women who support Trump and his “locker room talk” comments, Clinton said,

“When I see women doing that, I think why are they publicly disrespecting themselves? Why are they opening the door to have someone say that about them in their workplace? In a community setting? Do they not see the connection there?” 

Additionally, Clinton also said something similar to The New York Times. There she claimed that people voted for Trump because he promised to take way jobs from women:

Clinton reiterated her belief that many Trump voters were just sexist: “The idea that women have to fit certain stereotypes; that’s a weight around the ankle of every ambitious woman I’ve ever met…we get constant messaging our whole lives: You’re not thin enough, talented enough, smart enough. Your voice isn’t what we want to hear. This has to be called out for what it is: a cultural, political, economic game that’s being played to keep women in their place.”

A weak explanation at best. But this only covers the men. The real question is what about women?

While speaking in India at a summit, Clinton was asked why she thinks 52 percent of white women voted for Trump, despite them knowing about the controversial “Access Hollywood” tape.

Clinton’s response?

“[Democrats] do not do well with white men and we don’t do well with married, white women,” Clinton explained. “And part of that is an identification with the Republican Party, and a sort of ongoing pressure to vote the way that your husband, your boss, your son, whoever, believes you should.”

So despite Clinton’s decades of helping women, we remain helpless, I guess?

Needless to say, I wasn’t the only outraged independent, free-thinking woman. Even the Left eviscerated Clinton:

In interviews with The Hill on Tuesday, even the staunchest Clinton allies as well as longtime advisers say the comments were cringeworthy and ultimately detrimental to Democrats.

“She put herself in a position where [Democrats] from states that Trump won will have to distance themselves from her even more,” said one former senior Clinton aide. “That’s a lot of states.”

Another Clinton surrogate questioned the decisionmaking behind Clinton’s remarks. For months, some Democrats have been arguing that Clinton’s sentiments have been counterproductive to the party’s rebuilding efforts. And some have told her she should emulate former President Obama’s model to only make statements when it’s essential.

Even before she launched her book tour last fall for “What Happened,” party strategists have said Clinton should lay low.

“She’s annoying me. She’s annoying everyone, as far as I can tell,” said one 2016 Clinton surrogate. “Who lets her say these things?”

One former senior Obama White House aide added, “If these statements are a form of catharsis, it would be in the Democratic Party’s best interest for her to get these out of her system soon.”

Interestingly and perhaps ironically as well, Clinton doesn’t realize she admits incompetence as a leader. One of the supposedly most powerful women in history laments her lack of effectiveness with women.

Further, Hillary Clinton implies that women by default of their gender automatically owed her their allegiance.

So why did white women abandon Hillary Clinton?

Women are intuitive. We recognize things in people that men will admit they tend to miss. And what we saw in Clinton was an unbridled thirst for power. It was clear to many women that Clinton would say anything or do anything to achieve her goals. And at times, she clearly sacrificed women.

For example Page Six reported:

Harvey Weinstein is throwing a starry fundraiser for Hillary Clinton on Monday with co-hosts Leo DiCaprioJennifer LopezSarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick.

Weinstein and his designer wife, Georgina Chapman, are planning a dinner and conversation with Clinton at their Manhattan home to benefit the Hillary Victory Fund.

And how much did good ol’ Harvey Weinstein make for Hillary? $1.8 million. And the attendees were a “who’s who?” of Hollywood elites.

In addition to covering up her husbands many rapes and sexual allegations how does Hillary explain decades of surrounding herself with powerful men who live abusive lives towards women?

After allowing the misuse of dozens of women, Clinton builds a career as a feminist?

But don’t let Hillary’s relationships with men in her orbit persuade you.

What of the millions in donations she freely takes from countries who treat women has second-class citizens?

Cash rolled in for decades from the Saudi Government to the Clinton Foundation.

“Saudi Arabia, was a key Clinton benefactor. The oil-producing giant has had a relationship with the Clintons dating back to Bill Clinton’s time as governor of Arkansas.

In 1992, while running for president, then-Gov. Clinton secured a $3.5 million Saudi donation for a Middle East studies program at the University of Arkansas.

A few weeks after Clinton was inaugurated president, the Saudis kicked in another $20 million.

Overall, the Clinton Foundation has received staggering sums from Saudi benefactors — between $18 million and $50 million. (The foundation’s donations are reported in ranges, not specific numbers.)

While Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, Bill Clinton gave two speeches in Saudi Arabia, earning a total of $600,000.

In January 2011, for example, Bill Clinton spoke at a global business forum in Riyadh founded by the Saudi Investment Authority and sponsored by the Dabbagh Group, a commercial colossus with close ties to the Saudi royal family.

His fee for the speech: $300,000.”

So, Hillary Clinton can continue to give all the excuses she wants but after this kind of disgusting “feminist” track record, what is this bitch missing?

American women have indeed voted their best interests by voting Hillary OUT!

Back to top button