BACKFIRE: FBI Releases Heavily Redacted Info on Steele Dossier

Schiff isn't talking #KevinJackson

BACKFIRE: FBI Releases Heavily Redacted Info on Steele Dossier

The FBI pulled another fast one. They sneaked in their release of heavily redacted documents on the Steele dossier.

This was done when they knew the news cycle would be slow.

Don’t think the fake news media reported this latest document dump. However, as Washington Examiner reported , that exactly what happened:

The FBI on Friday released dozens of documents related to the bureau’s relationship with former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, who compiled the infamous Trump dossier.

The 71 pages are heavily redacted and contain mostly payment requests and receipts. The documents also confirm the FBI terminated its relationship with Steele after he leaked information to the press about the dossier on President Trump.

“[Confidential Human Source] confirmed to an outside third party that CHS has a confidential relationship with the FBI,” the document states. “In the article, CHS revealed CHS’ relationship with the FBI as well as information that CHS obtained and provided to FBI.”

“On November 1, 2016, CHS confirmed all of this to the handling agent,” the document continues. “Additionally, handling agent advised that CHS was not to operate to obtain any intelligence whatsoever on behalf of the FBI.”

To use anything associated with Steele only proves how much the FBI and the other Deep State swamp rats wanted to get Donald Trump.

The article continues,

Steele’s name does not appear in any of the unredacted portions of the documents, though the FBI labeled the file “Records Between FBI and Christopher Steele Part 01 of 01.”

Another mostly redacted page says Steele was “verbally admonished” in February. No other details about why he was reprimanded were made public in the documents.

So why is it that every time we get a document dump, the documents are heavily redacted?

Trending: New Republican Campaign Ad for Mid-Terms featuring “The Strzok”

The Democrats claim they want the truth, but never seem to demand unredacted documents. Every time we are to get new documents, the Democrats claim “national security”. But nothing we’ve seen has had anything to do with national security.

And what’s up with the radio silence of the Left?

Adam Schiff hasn’t said a whole lot about Russian collusion, and I suspect he knows that the next dump could doom the Democrats.

Again I ask where are James Comey’s cryptic tweets. And what of Eric Holder’s ominous warnings of the fall of the Republic?

I sense something big about to happen. Just call it a “gut feeling”. Sure there are the conspiracy theories surrounding “Q”, but my feelings are based on other factors.

For example, the Mueller witch hunt is unofficially over. And when the realization hits that the Democrats won’t win the House–which is any time soon–the Democrats will attempt damage-control from DefCon 1. Essentially, there is collateral damage when DefCon 1 is reached, so containment is the only option.

President Trump tweeted recently that the Republicans will hold the House, his first public declaration of what I have said publicly for months. I don’t know why he chose this weekend to tweet that, but I agree with his assessment, obviously.

As I mentioned earlier, the radio silence of the Left is deafening. They’ve done this before, usually before a document dump. But we just had one. I suspect more are on the way, as I know their patterns.

Regardless, the reign of the Leftists is over for the next few elections–at least a decade. And when the information comes to light about their crooked deeds, that date could slip by a couple of decades.

 

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.