One Democrat Kavanaugh Accuser BITES THE DUST

Kavanaugh Slams Hearing

Democrats really know how to pick their poster children.

I guess the fact that Plaintiff #3 against Kavanaugh was represented by creepy porn lawyer, Michael Avenatti didn’t raise any “blue” flags.

With Democrats, the sleazier the people involved, the more “credible” Democrats claim them to be.

Just like Julie Swetnick. Look at how she has backfired, as this tweet suggests:

BREAKING: Michael Avanetti’s client Julie Swetnick was sued in 2000 for making false sexual assault allegations.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: SMOKING GUN: Former Clinton Foundation CFO Tells ALL

Her employer determined she engaged in “inappropriate conduct” & made “false & retaliatory allegations” of sexual harassment against two male co-workers

https://twitter.com/RightHook99/status/1046149478514937862

Say it isn’t so. But one of Kavanaugh’s accusers has a history of lying about sexual abuse?!

And if that isn’t enough, she’s been accused of “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct”?

So says The Daily Caller:

The woman who charges she was gang-raped at a party where Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was present, Julie Swetnick, had a lawsuit filed against her by a former employer that alleged she engaged in “unwelcome, sexually offensive conduct” towards two male co-workers, according to court documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Get it; not one, but two male co-workers.

Apparently Swetnick wasn’t just going to the “gang rapes” to observe. Recall that Swetnick admitted to attending as many as ten gang-rapes. Even braindead Democrats knew they hired the wrong woman for this gig.

One gang rape and people might think you were tricked into going. Ten gang rapes, and let’s just call things as they are. Sex parties, and Swetnick enjoyed them.

Next, Swetnick has another problem. Her issue pertains to her academic credentials. The article continues,

WebTrends, a web analytics company headquartered in Portland, filed the defamation and fraud lawsuit against Swetnick in Oregon in November 2000 and also alleged that she lied about graduating from Johns Hopkins University.

Yes, the old academic credentials. How many Lefties have faked their credentials, Senator Blumenthal?

Ford lied as well, saying she was a licensed psychologist, when in fact she isn’t licensed at all. She’s an academic.

Democrats handled Ford with kid gloves, speaking of her courage. They gloated over her clinical description of the drama that supposedly occurred at the hands of Brett Kavanaugh. They offered excuses for her lack of emotion in describing the supposed horrific event. Simply put, Democrats cover for her lies. And there is a reason they didn’t bring up Plaintiffs 1 or 2 in the Senate hearings on Kavanaugh. Lack of credibility.

Ford has lost credibility as well. Real survivors of sexual assault didn’t buy her act. More will say the same. Thus Democrats will look for more “survivors” of Kavanaugh.

We will continue to ask questions about the 2 and 3. Why aren’t we having hearings into their allegations? We all know the answer.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.