DEVASTATING: Democrats Never Thought THIS Far Ahead

As if Democrats don’t have enough problems, they’ve created more for themselves.

The demonization of Brett Kavanaugh was supposed to give Democrats a rally point. #MeToo on steroids would bring down Kavanaugh. Not one, not two, but three women.

As we’ve learned, it only takes one. But when you can bolster those numbers with three promiscuous drunks, why not shoot for the stars.

Talk about testing the sensibilities of Americans. Putting three women forward with the reputations of these really was meant to prove that women rule the world.

take our poll - story continues below

Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?

  • Who should replace Nikki Haley as our ambassador to the U.N.?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: NPR: Why Democrats Aren’t Discussing Russian Collusion

Take the worst of women, and put them up against the best of men. If women win this #MeToo grudge match, then men could kiss their asses good-bye.

But as Deniece Williams sang in Footloose, “Let’s hear it for the boy!”

Not necessarily to enter the fracas, Fox News interviewed the ex-boyfriend of Swetnick:

The ex-boyfriend of Julie Swetnick, the third woman to make uncorroborated, lurid allegations of sexual misconduct against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, told Fox News exclusively on Monday that she had threatened to kill his unborn child and at times even bizarrely asked him to hit her..

“Right after I broke up with her, she basically called me many times and at one point she basically said, ‘You will never, ever see your unborn child alive,'” Richard Vinneccy said on “The Ingraham Angle.”

According to Vinneccy, Swetnick told him at the time, ‘I’m just going to go over there and kill you guys.'”

Swetnick’s creepy porn lawyer did an interview on CNN Monday night, where question Vinneccy’s credibility. His defense alleges Vinneccy is the estranged ex-boyfriend.

Vinneccy offered in this interview that Swetnick never once mentioned these claims to him throughout their relationship. But what may be lend more insight into Swetnick was his comment that Swetnick would beg him to hit her, for reasons unknown to him.

And if that story wasn’t enough to debunk Swetnick’s claims, another ex-boyfriend of hers, Dennis Ketterer, had sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee refuting her claims.

“During a conversation about our sexual preferences, things got derailed when Julie told me that she liked to have sex with more than one guy at a time. In fact sometimes with several at one time. She wanted to know if that would be ok in our relationship,” the letter states. “I asked her if this was just a fantasy of hers. She responded that she first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time. She brought it up because she wanted to know if I would be interested in that.”

“Julie never said anything about being sexually assaulted, raped, gang-raped or having sex against her will. She never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh in any capacity,” he continued.”

So, perhaps Swetnick really did attend parties where multiple people were having sex with one another, but there’s one problem.

No one could put Kavanaugh in those situations.

One would think this would cast a negative light on Julie’s character, not Kavanaugh’s, but in the world of Democrats you have to spin even the sick and twisted to their favor!

There is more than a little strange attached to this woman, as well as the other accusers. The mere fact that the first two women openly admitted to being drunk should have provided Democrats with enough reason to take pause. But that’s not the Democrat way.

Thus, the stories became more elaborate, and drunken 30+ year old memories have suddenly become more clear. You know how the epinephrine is connected to the hippocampus and all.

And what of Ford’s ex-boyfriend?

It seems the Democrats hadn’t counted on men who knew these vicious liars saving the day.

As Fox News reported, there are new developments in the story of Christine Blasey Ford, and on multiple fronts:

In a written declaration released Tuesday and obtained by Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor accusing Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, directly contradicts her testimony under oath last week that she had never helped anyone prepare for a polygraph examination.

The former boyfriend, whose name was redacted in the declaration, also said Ford neither mentioned Kavanaugh nor mentioned she was a victim of sexual misconduct during the time they were dating from about 1992 to 1998. He said he saw Ford going to great lengths to help a woman he believed was her “life-long best friend” prepare for a potential polygraph test. He added that the woman, Monica McLean, had been interviewing for jobs with the FBI and U.S. Attorney’s office.

This news was horrible for the Left. Because her ex pretty much punched holes in every aspect of Ford’s testimony.

For example, he directly refutes all the nonsense around flying and claustrophobia.

He further claimed that Ford never voiced any fear of flying (even while aboard a propeller plane) and seemingly had no problem living in a “very small,” 500 sq. ft. apartment with one door — apparently contradicting her claims that she could not testify promptly in D.C. because she felt uncomfortable traveling on planes, as well as her suggestion that her memories of Kavanuagh’s alleged assault prompted her to feel unsafe living in a closed space or one without a second front door.

Ford “never expressed a fear of closed quarters, tight spaces, or places with only one exit,” the former boyfriend wrote.

Based on this man’s testimony, if she suffered from none of the things she claims, then where does that leave her fiction against Kavanaugh?

Nowhere. That’s where!

Evidently the Democrats felt nobody would come from the pasts of these women and refute their nonsense. Given their drinking, thankfully somebody was around to remember what really happened. But don’t depend on Democrats to consider that sane people will ask basic questions to vet the story.

And what of this irony, where men actually save the day. Men stole victory from the jaws of defeat, which is why Brett Kavanaugh will become a SCOTUS judge.

Talk about sticking it to the #MeToo movement. To paraphrase the Democrats, “I believe him!”

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.