Send a Message to Liberals: Prosecute Ford

C.P. StetskoOctober 9, 2018
5 minutes read
Facebook Twitter

Send a Message to Liberals:  Prosecute Ford

It Began 30 Years Ago.

The Judge Brett Kavanaugh appointment fiasco is just a recent example of more than 30 years of horrendous mistreatment of Republican nominees organized by the Democrat leadership. Of course liberals were aided by allies in the mainstream media and radical progressive organizations.

Then-US Senator Joe Biden (yes…THAT Joe Biden), created a ridiculous strategy known as the “Biden Report.”  It remained the Liberal playbook in opposing Republican Judicial nominees for the next several decades.

The lead-off was the ‘self-proclaimed’ pseudo-“Liberal Lion” of the US Senate when he dared to impugn the character, intellect, and integrity of the late-judge and scholar Robert Bork:

Mary Jo Kopechne could not be reached for comments.

The Ghost in Biden’s Closet

Before the fiasco of the last six weeks, the previous judicial nomination circus swirled around 41st President George HW Bush nominee Clarence Thomas to replace the late-Justice Thurgood Marshall.  It would be Professor Anita Hill at that time who came forward with accusations of sexual harassment.  Like Judge Kavanaugh, Justice Thomas was confirmed by a narrow margin, but the damage to his character was irreversible.

Then, Senator Biden made an outrageous decree on the Senate. He wasn’t prepared for his words to backfire many years later:

They Just Kept Going and Going

Filerbustering conservative federal judicial nominations at the beginning of the George W Bush administration is a shameful moment in the history of checks-and-balances.  It was the black-eye of the Senate and Judiciary…until the Kavanaugh hearings.

According to the New York Times:

In 2001, future Obama advisors Cass Sunstein, Laurence Tribe, and Marcia Greenberger  conspired to urge leftists:

“to scrutinize judicial nominees more closely than ever.” Specifically, they said, “there was no obligation to confirm someone just because they are scholarly or erudite.”

 

The Senate Democrats employed the filibuster blocking the confirmation votes on several federal judicial nominees, most famously: Miguel Estrada, Priscilla Owen, William Pryor, Charles Pickering, Carolyn Kuhl, Janice Rogers Brown, William G. Myers III, Henry W. Saad, David W. McKeague, and Richard A. Griffin.  Many of the nominees would never get the opportunity of a confirmation vote.

As CNN explains:

Under the agreement, three of President Bush’s nominees for appellate courts stalled by Democratic filibusters will go forward and two others will remain subject to filibuster.

Under the deal, the senators will allow three of Bush’s controversial nominees to come to a vote: Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown and William Pryor.

With 55 seats, Republicans have been unable to garner the 60 votes that Senate rules specify are necessary to end a filibuster — a form of extended debate that has been part of Senate rules since the early 19th century.

Several of the nominees chose to withdraw their nominations after waiting several years for a confirmation vote!  Most notably was Estrada’s nomination, as it was considered the most contentious.

National Review attacked Democrats for veiled racism.

Indeed, if Congress were an ordinary employer and a federal judgeship were treated as a job under federal anti-discrimination law, then Estrada would likely win on a claim of employment discrimination.

‘Lowering’ The Bar.

It seems just when Liberals can’t dig any lower, Democrats find a shovel.

The Wall Street Journal reported:

A friend of Christine Blasey Ford told FBI investigators that she felt pressured by Dr. Ford’s allies to revisit her initial statement that she knew nothing about an alleged sexual assault by a teenage Brett Kavanaugh, which she later updated to say that she believed but couldn’t corroborate Dr. Ford’s account, according to people familiar with the matter.

Leland Keyser, who Dr. Ford has said was present at the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted in the 1980s, told investigators that Monica McLean, a retired Federal Bureau of Investigation agent and a friend of Dr. Ford’s, had urged her to clarify her statement.

That was pretty clear! Of course, McLean is the same person Ford helped prepare for a polygraph. Yet Ford claims she never took part, participated, or had ever done anything in preparation for a lie detector test! Thus Dr Ford lied under oath during her testimony in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Liar Liar Pants on Fire

This isn’t the first lie Ford told.

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1045354522720243714

But Not So Fast! 

National Review explains further:

This revelation has prompted many to suggest that McLean is guilty of witness tampering. Is she? Well, maybe. But it would be a heavy lift. 18 U.S. Code § 1512 holds that one is guilty of “tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant” if one “knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person.” Moreover, this law applies to those who “influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding.”

The vagueness vanished when the irritating Senator Richard Blumenthal opened his mouth:

Proof in the Pudding

Leftists are willing to crucify Kavanaugh without any proof whatsoever. However, there are several pieces of evidence that refute Ford’s story.

According to Fox News, an ex-boyfriend of Dr Ford has submitted a sworn letter to the contrary!

Connecting The Dots!

So, this is…

Is this yet another piece of the bureaucratic “Secret Society” attempting to another commit act of sedition against the country revealing itself?  Is this another card being played the liberal DC establishment to undermine the Trump Administration?

Sticking to their Story

Ford must’ve warned McLean to stick to the story, no matter what. Therefore, it’s not surprising Agent McLean is denying the allegations, which seems good enough for the mainstream media.  But not for Senator Chuck Grassley, who has demanded Dr Ford’s lawyers’ turnover the notes from Ford’s therapy sessions in which Ford discussed the alleged incident.

Ford and her attorney Debra Katz already started distancing themselves from this entire affair, by indicating neither want to pursue any further legal issues against Kavanaugh.  But Democrat activists are seething at plans to implement articles of impeach against the newly minted Justice Kavanaugh, as well as pursue impeaching:  Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, President Trump, and Vice President Pence.  That is merely just the beginning of what the Social Progressives have planned should they assume power in November.

The Payoff

For someone who doesn’t want the notoriety, Ford sure found it…and has thus far profited over $572,600 in the process.  With the way things are now breaking, she’s going to need that newfound wealth…for legal fees.

Based on her expert opinion, sex-crimes investigator Rachel Mitchell said there was not enough evidence to bring a case against Judge Kavanaugh to prosecutors.  If Dr Ford is not fully investigated and possibly prosecuted for misleading the US Senate, and the country, then what is to stop someone from doing this again to the next Supreme Court nominee?

Image result for sarah palin media mistreatment

Many are saying the Democrats and the media would not dare treat a woman the way they treated Judge Kavanaugh.  They must have forgotten history, the Left already has!

C.P. StetskoOctober 9, 2018
5 minutes read
Back to top button