As if the Democrats don’t have enough to worry about, then they decide to target WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange?
Talk about short memories for these Democrats. But then again, asses aren’t known for their memories.
Assange was a one-man wrecking crew for the Democrats in 2016. He went on hiatus during the midterms, likely feeling he would be a free man by now. Unfortunately for him, no such luck, yet.
Sadly, Assange remains embattled, when he should be heralded. But in their zest to get Trump via Assange, Democrats again expose themselves to scrutiny they shall regret.
Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?
The New York Post wrote,
Assange hinted prior to the election that the Russians weren’t the source of all the Democratic Party e-mails he published. What if the leak was from inside the Democratic Party itself?
What if Assange’s testimony, when it is forced, shows that the leaker was a disgruntled anti-Hillary Clinton Democrat who happened to be mysteriously murdered in a case that hasn’t yet been solved?
That, my friends, is one of the shockers that could hit the press and the financial markets in the months ahead. The Democrats should be careful what they wish for when it comes to Assange.
Who is the source?
I don’t know; but I do know who it is not.
“Can you say to the American people, unequivocally, that you did not get this information about the DNC, John Podesta’s emails, can you tell the American people 1,000 percent you did not get it from Russia or anybody associated with Russia?”
“Yes,” Assange said. “We can say — we have said repeatedly — over the last two months that our source is not the Russian government and it is not a state party.”
Theories are that Assange got the emails from a Clinton campaign insider, namely Seth Rich.
Up to this point, the media and the Clinton machine have managed to keep Seth Rich under the radar. But if Assange confirms under oath that the source is Rich, then all hell will break lose. And it’s possible for Assange to name Rich, given that he is dead. This revelation could act as an insurance policy in the future. In other words, if the Clintons agree not to kill people who testify against them, then Assange might never reveal his sources.
Up to this point, Assange continues to remain quiet about his source, Rich’s death notwithstanding. But if pushed, might he decide differently? After all, he’s alluded to the source being Rich, as Fox 5 reported in 2017:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has spoken out about the death of a Democratic National Committee staffer killed nearby his Washington D.C. home.
In the past, Assange hinted Seth Rich may have been a WikiLeaks informant, and in an exclusive interview with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, he revealed even more.
But once again, Assange skirted the question of whether Rich was an informant in the interview. He would only say he was concerned about any potential sources who would try to help WikiLeaks in its endeavors.
Seth Rich is a can of worms I suggest the Democrats not open. Because inside that can may be a Trojan horse can of “Whoop Ass”.
But what if you don’t believe the Seth Rich conspiracy. What about Ivanka Trump’s emails.
I suggest that by pressing hard on Ivanka Trump, Democrats may unleash the kraken on themselves again. Lord knows, Democrats are relentless in their propagation of the lie. Just look at the Christine Blasey Ford hearing.
Back to Assange
His testimony can’t help the Democrats. Because as all the sane world knows, the Democrats tried to steal the 2016 election.
Hillary Clinton would have mothered Lucifer’s baby to get elected president. And Bill Clinton would have adopted the demon-child and become his best buddy.
The crooked nature of the Clintons is boundless. This is why they are Democrats.