Steele Dossier Author ADMITS HE WAS HIRED to Help the Clinton Campaign

If the Democrats wanted Russians, they got them. Because the Russians are now fighting back.

Finally, we get the other side of the Russian story as three Russian bankers decided to challenge the nonsense spewed by Democrats. And in their want to clear their names we get the facts regarding the infamous “Steele Dossier.” These are facts that will crush the Democrats.

As The Washington Times reported,

British ex-spy Christopher Steele, who wrote the Democrat-financed anti-Trump dossier, said in a court case that he was hired by a Democratic law firm in preparation for Hillary Clinton challenging the results of the 2016 presidential election.

He said the law firm Perkins Coie wanted to be in a position to contest the results based on evidence he unearthed on the Trump campaign conspiring with Moscow on election interference.

His scenario is contained in a sealed Aug. 2 declaration in a defamation law suit brought by three Russian bankers in London. The trio’s American attorneys filed his answers Tuesday in a libel lawsuit in Washington against the investigative firm Fusion GPS, which handled the former British intelligence officer.

When the bough breaks the cradle will fall.

Or how about the straw that broke the donkey’s back. The donkey in this case is the ass known as Democrats.

take our poll - story continues below

Who are the happiest people?

  • Who are the happiest people?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Breaking: Loretta Lynch Turns on Comey

The article continues,

In an answer to interrogatories, Mr. Steele wrote: “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.

“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.”

The Democrats never filed a challenge, but Mr. Steele’s answer suggested that was one option inside the Clinton camp, which funded Mr. Steele’s research along with the Democratic National Committee.

Let’s see how long it takes for Bob “Inspector Clousseau” Mueller to connect the dots on this?

I figured the person to expose all of this might be General Michael Flynn. Given his obvious innocence, I expected a lawsuit where he forced Mueller to give him all the bogus information accumulated on Flynn. Further, I expect Mueller is knee-deep in the cover-up.

Instead however, it was the Russians who exposed the dirt on the Democrats.

More on the Russians.

The three Russians in question control Alfa Bank in their homeland. Supposedly the dossier discussed the existence of tapes whereby the Trump organization was linked to Alfa Bank. Moreover, this information was said to exist on a computer within the Trump organization.

That story fell apart when the computer IP address was found to originate from a spam server in Philadelphia. Some surmise that any link between Alfa Bank and Trump was merely coincidental, as Alfa Bank employees stayed at Trump properties. In layman’s terms, the Russians were spammed.

In their treachery to get Trump, Democrats dragged the reputations of the Russians through the mud. So now the three men are suing.

Already that lawsuit yields amazing insights. Essentially the information gathered thus far proves yet again that the Steele dossier was completely bogus. What was formerly well-founded conjecture is now proven.

How pathetic are the actions of the Democrats?

I asked Democrats a while back, what if they find out their party did exactly what’s being alleged?

Progressives Should Ask: What If Obama Targeted Trump?

Democrats are all in for Obama, at least publicly. Privately, I know them to be much more truthful about how they feel about America’s first (half) black president.

But as a thought experiment, let’s pretend that Leftists really do love Obama and not their twisted ideology that lost them 1000+ seats during his tenure. Let’s further pretend that Leftists really do believe that despite all the evidence to the contrary, their ideology works best for America and the Democratic Party represents America’s future.

While we are pretending, let’s throw in a potential (and highly likely) reality, and that is Obama worked with RINO Republicans, the Clinton campaign, outside clandestine operatives, the media, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the FISA court, and the Russians to set up Donald Trump, thus influencing an election.

As I went on to write, consider all the scandals Democrats will need to rethink:

Yet the media and Democrat politicos continue their attempts convince Americans that they are cleaner than an operating room.

Still, I suggest to Leftists that they soul-search. Ask themselves the question, “What if Obama orchestrated all that we see today?”

Would they rethink Fast and Furious and other non-scandals that Obama so boastfully claim didn’t happen on his watch? Would they rethink Obama, the Democrats, the Clintons and their “foundation”, the DNC, the media, and the Leftist-run government of the past decades?

When the truth comes out–and it will soon–Democrats will face the cold, hard reality of their party. And it won’t be good.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.