Finally! State Department Identifies Clinton Crimes

#TeamKJ, #KevinJackson, #TheBlackSphere

For decades, the Clinton clan’s illegal activities continually carried absolutely no consequences.

The abomination of justice leaves millions of conservatives disgruntled in the least.

Finally, it appears Clinton’s luck is wearing thin. The government just publicly acknowledged Clinton’s wrongdoing in the long-debated email scandal. And this time, Comey can’t fix it for her.

As Fox News explains:

The State Department revealed Monday that it has identified “multiple security incidents” involving current or former employees’ handling of Hillary Clinton’s emails, and that 23 “violations” and seven “infractions” have been issued as part of the department’s ongoing investigation.

The information came in a letter to Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is responsible for overseeing the security review.

“To this point, the Department has assessed culpability to 15 individuals, some of whom were culpable in multiple security incidents,” Mary Elizabeth Taylor, the State Department’s Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of Legislative Affairs, wrote to Grassley. “DS has issued 23 violations and 7 infractions incidents. … This number will likely change as the review progresses.”

Trump Weighs In.

I imagine Trump was downright giddy when the news hit. For the past three years, leftists subjected us to brutally biased investigations, endless slander, spying, and repeated attempts of sabotage. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton’s only real loss, besides her busted book sales, was the Oval Office.

take our poll - story continues below

Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?

  • Which Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has The Wildest Campaign Promise So Far?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Panic Sets in as CNN Ratings Plummet

Americans dished out the only punishment we could muster without the help of law enforcement. We kept her out of the White House. Still, we’ve been waiting on pins and needles for the day the investigations finally reveal the real villain. Well folks, today is that day. And you can bet Donald Trump set Twitter on fire with the news.


Fox continues:

The State Department, calling the matter “serious,” said it expected to conclude the investigation by Sept. 1. The department acknowledged that the probe was unusually time-consuming.

“Given the volume of emails provided to the Department from former Secretary Clinton’s private email server, the Department’s process has been necessarily more complicated and complex requiring a significant dedication of time and resources,” Taylor wrote.

Taylor also noted that disciplinary consequences were pending.

“In every instance in which the Department found an individual to be culpable of a valid security violation or three or more infractions, the Department forwarded the outcome to the Bureau of Diplomatic Security’s Office of Personnel Security and Suitability (DS/PSS), to be placed in the individuals’ official security file,” Taylor wrote. “All valid security incidents are reviewed by DS and taken into account every time an individual’s eligibility for access to classified information is considered.

“This referral occurred whether or not the individual was currently employed with the Department of State and such security files are kept indefinitely,” Taylor added. “Consistent with the referral policy, for individuals who were still employed with the Department at the time of adjudication, the Department referred all valid security violations or multiple infractions to the Bureau of Human Resources.”

The State Department declined to release the names of the employees, consistent with its procedures. The department promised another update once its review is completed.

Prosecute Her

Private citizens started demanding the prosecution of Hillary Clinton when news of the email server scandal first broke. For once, bona fide proof of her crimes existed. Yet Loretta Lynch and James Comey got together and decided to sweep the whole thing under the rug. Clearly, they shared the belief that Hillary was destined to win the election.

Of course, they weren’t just being sweet and kind. You can bet Comey and Lynch were promised some pretty hefty payback for their service. Honestly, I’m surprised the duo remained tight-lipped for so long after the big loss. But as the saying goes, “All good things must come to an end.”

Thus, Lynch recently went on record to officially call Comey a liar:

It was only a matter of time before the rats started ratting each other out.

Now, Loretta Lynch says Comey is flat out lying.

More specifically, the former  Attorney General says she never instructed Comey to refer to Clinton’s email scandal as a “matter” instead of an “investigation.” and she went as far as to say Comey’s characterization of their conversation was shocking.

Apparently, Lynch set the record straight back in December during her testimony before the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees. But the testimony was only released to the public Monday.

Think about it, this infighting was covered up the entire time Mueller investigated Russian collusion. I’m willing to bet Democrats were absolutely certain they’d have Trump’s head on a platter. Thus, they convinced themselves Comey’s lies were benign.

Of course, Lynch and Comey are birds of a feather. Thus, they create lies together. And it’s nearly impossible to extract the truth.

What We Do Know

However, despite the convoluted stories floating around, one point remains undisputed: Clinton breached American security time and again.

Clinton’s private email use has remained in the spotlight. [Now], the DOJ looks into potential misconduct in the handling of federal authorities’ surveillance and intelligence operations in 2016. Then-FBI Director James Comey said in 2016 that Clinton’s handling of classified information was “extremely careless” — remarks that were watered down from their original draft — but that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges.

It emerged earlier this year that then-FBI general counsel James Baker testified that he thought Clinton should have been prosecuted until he was convinced otherwise “pretty late” in the investigation.

And, last month, a trove of partially redacted FBI documents from the agency’s investigation into whether Clinton mishandled classified information — a probe known as the “Midyear Exam” — revealed that top Clinton aides were shocked at apparent attempts to hack her private email servers.

The document release revealed numerous episodes in which the Clinton team either suspected it had been hacked or seemingly acknowledged that security measures had come up short.

“omg,” top Clinton aide Huma Abedin wrote to Justin Cooper, the technology pro overseeing Clinton’s private home-based email servers, when he told her shortly after midnight on Jan. 9, 2011, that “someone was trying to hack us.”

And in March, it was revealed that the Justice Department “negotiated” an agreement with Clinton’s legal team that ensured the FBI did not have access to emails on her private servers relating to the Clinton Foundation. Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok testified about the arrangement during a closed-door appearance before the House Judiciary Committee last summer, according to a transcript released this year.

Massive Burial

Here’s where things get even screwier:

“A significant filter team” was employed at the FBI, Strzok said, to “work through the various terms of the various consent agreements.” Thus, limitations imposed on agents’ searches included date ranges and names of domains and people, Strzok said, among other categories.

The agreement was reached, Strzok said, because “according to the attorneys, we lacked probable cause to get a search warrant for those servers and projected that either it would take a very long time and/or it would be impossible to get to the point where we could obtain probable cause to get a warrant.”

Former Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who chaired the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee until 2017 and is now a Fox News contributor, said the arrangement signaled that agents wanted willful blindness.

“What’s bizarre about this, is in any other situation, there’s no possible way they would allow the potential perpetrator to self-select what the FBI gets to see,” Chaffetz said, noting that the FBI was aware that the servers contained classified information in unclassified settings. “The FBI should be the one to sort through those emails — not the Clinton attorneys.”

The DOJ’s goal, Chaffetz said, was to “make sure they hear no evil, see no evil — they had no interest in pursuing the truth.”

Ironically, from every end of this cover-up, the same fatal flaw derailed the dems. They underestimated Donald J. Trump, President of the United States.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.