Surprise. The Wuflu vaccines are less effective than placebos.
Don’t believe me, check out what the FDA stated per Grabien:
Buried 23 pages into the FDA’s approval summary for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine is data that cuts to the core of the vaccination debate. Presented in a place and manner where it has been almost completely overlooked until now, the data reveals the number of deaths among people who received the C-19 vaccine and people who received a placebo in Pfizer’s largest clinical trial.
Those figures provide the only reliable measure of the vaccine’s greatest benefits and risks because they are unambiguous (death), enumerate the worst possible outcome (death), and control for every conflating factor (due to the design of the study).
These critical findings reveal that “there were a total of 38 deaths” during the trial, including 21 people who received the vaccine and “17 in the placebo group.” Considered together with the fact that about half of the 40,000 people in the trial received a placebo, these results show no statistically significant impact on the risk of death.
As I said earlier, this “vaccine” is a joke. Less people died in the placebo group than in the vaccinated group, PER THE FDA.
But it gets worse. Check out what happened when they wanted to test long-range aspects of the drug.
Beyond six months, the effects of the vaccine are much more uncertain because Pfizer and other vaccine manufacturers removed participants from their most-rigorous studies after a maximum of six months. They did this in defiance of government healthcare regulatory agencies who recommended that the subjects be enrolled for at least one year.
The benefits and harms to young children are even more murky because Pfizer is using a less reliable study design that enrolled only 2,268 children. This decision was made in spite of the fact that greater clarity is vital because the risk of being harmed by Covid-19 dramatically declines at younger ages, while the major known risks of the vaccine increase.
The NIH agrees. And like with the proof from the FDA, additional proof comes from the NIH itself.
From their website:
The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines.
Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?
Sadly, we’re not just dealing with an ineffective vaccine. At least 70 people die per day from these vaccines. Meanwhile, the media is practically silent. Like on the recent death of Jessica Berg.
Berg died from a vaccine that scared her. She didn’t want to get the “death poke”. But Biden’s vaccine mandate forced her to do so. She complied and then she died. And the media either refuses or is afraid to speak up. Probably due to the fact that doctors who speak out against the death poke risk losing their medical licenses for contradicting the government. Even though the FDA clearly contradicts the narrative crafted for public consumption. Are we living in some kind of Twilight Zone? Seriously, I think it’s a valid question.