
Sure, the world would be better off if there was a lot less leftism. But I’m not sure this Pennsylvania Democrat is playing with a full deck.
First, I have to admit a bit of sexism on my part. I’ve never considered ‘reproductive rights’ to be much of a man’s issue. If I were a liberal, this is where I’d say “I’m sorry I wasn’t woke yet, and I’ll try to do better.”
Instead, I’ll just forge ahead to the rest of the story. Representative Chris Rabb, who represents northwest Philadelphia, tried to create a viral conversation this past week with news of his latest bill.
I will be introducing a bill inspired by @RepKellyCassidy that requires all inseminators to undergo #vasectomies within 6 weeks of having their third child or 40th birthday, whichever comes first. /1
Additionally, . . .#ReproJustice #ReproductiveRights #AbortionIsHealthcare
— Rep. Chris Rabb (@RepRabb) October 2, 2021
My forthcoming bill will codify the definition of #wrongfulconception to include when a person has demonstrated negligence toward preventing #conception during intercourse. /2
And . . .
— Rep. Chris Rabb (@RepRabb) October 2, 2021
. . . this legislation will allow Pennsylvanians to take #civilaction against inseminators for unwanted #pregnancies who wrongfully conceive
a child with them. /3— Rep. Chris Rabb (@RepRabb) October 2, 2021
Last, this bill will empower Pennsylvanians to enforce this prospective law by offering a $10K reward for reporting to the proper authorities those #scofflaws who have not complied with this statute within the allotted timeframe. /4
— Rep. Chris Rabb (@RepRabb) October 2, 2021
Last, this bill will empower Pennsylvanians to enforce this prospective law by offering a $10K reward for reporting to the proper authorities those #scofflaws who have not complied with this statute within the allotted timeframe. /4
— Rep. Chris Rabb (@RepRabb) October 2, 2021
I’m still shaking my head in disbelief. Is this guy serious?
However, I’m a woman, so maybe I just don’t get it. Clearly, I don’t expect a man to fully understand women’s issues. But this world we live in is so full of men who were once women, women who were once men, and those odd creatures that actually identify as the gender they were born with, it can all get pretty confusing, pretty quick.
So, I picked up the phone and called the one and only Kevin Jackson. If anyone is going to give it to me straight, I trust Kevin will have the answer.
Jackson was quick to call this part of the New World Order: Population Control. In fact, it’s next-level Eugenics. From the black perspective, abortion is historically the answer. Because too many black fathers don’t take care of their babies. Thus, it’s not a stretch to see liberals pitch this as a cost saving idea. Undoubtedly, these vasectomies will cut out some percentage of abortions. Of course, who is paying for these vasectomies?
Will they become an expense insurance is required to cover? Or will the government pick up the tab? Further, if the government pays, would that be a state issue, or a federal problem? Will men receive vasectomy vouchers in the mail from Uncle Sam once their 40th rolls around? Perhaps the same Selective Service that just put my 18-year-old son on their list could get involved here. That’s more productive than a military draft.
There are so many logistics to consider. If you’re a woman living as a man, could you trade your vasectomy voucher for a male genitalia implant? Surely, that’s a valid question. What if you’re a man living as a woman? Could you “donate” your male organs to someone in need? Could we create a national “male organ” registry to make these swaps a smooth transition? Can you agree to be a donor when you renew your driver’s license? Is there room for AOC to add this to the Green New Deal?
I’m glad I’m not the only one baffled by this legislation.
Tweeters weighed in on the absurdities.
Mental illness is your only skillset.
— Larry Kutcher (@LarryKutcher) October 6, 2021
This is not sane, normal or American. On a side-note I have never heard anyone call a dad an inseminator. Cringe!
— Code of Vets ™ (@codeofvets) October 4, 2021
Also I’m sure calling men “inseminator” is gonna go over about as well as calling women “birthing people” keep talking about people like they are cattle you can neuter I’m sure they’re fine with it. Not to mention the hypocrisy of introducing in Pennsylvania is wild
— Stonepawz (@stonepawz) October 3, 2021
1. Male…it’s a male. Not an inseminator, just like I’m not an insemination receiver.
2. Forced sterilization is infrastructure!!!!— dumpsterfire21 (@20dumpsterfire) October 4, 2021
Yes, Dr Mengele, let’s enable forced medical procedures on citizens. What could possibly go wrong?
— IT Guy (@ITGuy1959) October 4, 2021
There were hundreds more, like Tim Young, who noticed Rabb might be suffering from confusion when he tweeted: “This mother****** thinks he’s in China!”
Unfortunately, Tim was met with comments like this one.
How odd… I don’t see a single thing you’ve tweeted that expressed similar outrage over Texas’s recent forced pregnancy laws and hotline that people can call to report woman they suspect of having an abortion and collect $10,000
— enDan (@en_Dan81) October 5, 2021
Where is the logic?
I guess no matter how you slice it and dice it, liberals will always defend the “right” to kill a baby. Drowning a feral cat carries a deeper stigma, and frankly, harsher punishments. In the words of the famed Black Eyed Peas, “what’s wrong with the world, momma?”