Progressives Should Ask: What If Obama Targeted Trump?

invasion of America; #TeamKJ; #KevinJackson

Progressives Should Ask: What If Obama Targeted Trump?

Democrats are all in for Obama, at least publicly. Privately, I know them to be much more truthful about how they feel about America’s first (half) black president.

But as a thought experiment, let’s pretend that Leftists really do love Obama and not their twisted ideology that lost them 1000+ seats during his tenure. Let’s further pretend that Leftists really do believe that despite all the evidence to the contrary, their ideology works best for America and the Democratic Party represents America’s future.

While we are pretending, let’s throw in a potential (and highly likely) reality, and that is Obama worked with RINO Republicans, the Clinton campaign, outside clandestine operatives, the media, the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the FISA court, and the Russians to set up Donald Trump, thus influencing an election.

So in our “pretend” scenario, RINO Republicans create a fake dossier against Trump. One of the RINOs, John McCain takes the fake document to the Democrats. Then the Democrats collude with corporate operatives and the media to “validate” the document.

take our poll - story continues below

Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?

  • Should Jim Acosta have gotten his press pass back?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Federal Court Ruling PANICS Scandal-Plagued Clintons

The FBI deems the document “authentic” and begins an investigation into the Trump campaign, even going as far as planting a mole. They partner with the CIA to add the “Russian collusion” intrigue, knowing this to be a false narrative.

Enter hapless rubes.

The FBI ambushes members of Trump’s campaign staff, and begins destroying the lives of innocent people in order to complete the narrative.

The media pounds out stories of Russian collusion, working in conjunction with the Clinton campaign, fake “informants” including high-level people in the Obama administration who vested in the narrative and future cover-up.

Despite all their efforts, Americans elect Donald Trump.

Let’s “pretend” for a moment that after all those efforts failed, the remnants of Obama’s evil plan then used the same organizations to overthrow a sitting president.

At this point, Trump discovers that he’s been “wiretapped”.

The media immediately pounces

Jake Tapper reported that the Obama Justice Department could find no evidence of wiretapping the newly elected President Trump:


Back to our thought experiment:

Let’s pretend that we now know candidate-Trump turned President-Trump was indeed wiretapped. Perhaps there were even more intrusions?

If we go back in time, we can re-examine the scandals of Hillary Clinton. Recall Clinton hid a server in her bathroom basement closet. She apologized, saying that in retrospect that separate server wasn’t a good idea.

However, she made amends by cooperating fully with the investigation that ensued. Doing so, Clinton and team deleted 33,000 emails, bleach-bit their servers, destroyed their Blackberrys with hammers, and in some cases refused to testify before Congress.

Certainly we can all agree that this IS INDEED how an innocent person would cooperate?

Therefore, in our thought experiment, the investigation of Hillary Clinton’s emails was a complete ruse by the FBI, and in fact the agency did cover-up for Hillary Clinton. If that far-fetched scenario did happen, however then it could be inferred that former FBI Director James Comey lied to the American people in that tortured exoneration of Hillary Clinton.

After roughly 12 minutes of explaining all the reasons why Hillary Clinton should be indicted, Comey then drops the feather on Clinton’s head:


Back to the post-election investigation.

Even though Leftists believe Trump to be guilty, Mueller can’t seem to make the case. Thus, the dominoes that fall have shifted to the Democrat operatives.

Through FBI emails we learned of exchanges between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. I’m not casting aspersions, but could they be part of the conspiracy to oust the president? If indeed they are (as they are) this certainly wouldn’t bode well for McCabe, one of the few casualties of the scenario thus far.

And in our thought experiment, the dominoes seem to fall upward.

Former CIA Director John Brennan as well as former Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper both deserve scrutiny for their testimonies and media appearances.

In this part of our “fictitious” scenario, Clapper offers truth, as he admitted the FBI indeed spied on the Trump campaign.

Clapper actually said that the FBI planting spies in the Trump campaign was good for Donald Trump:

So there is no doubt at this point that the FBI planted at least one spy in the Trump campaign. And there are rumors of more.

This begs a new question: What if Trump had done this to Hillary Clinton? Or Obama?

Rhetorical question.

I mentioned James Comey and his excuses for the actions of the FBI in planting a spy (or ten) inside the Trump campaign:

Facts matter. The FBI’s use of Confidential Human Sources (the actual term) is tightly regulated and essential to protecting the country. Attacks on the FBI and lying about its work will do lasting damage to our country. How will Republicans explain this to their grandchildren?

I love Comey’s condescending definition of “spy”:

Confidential Human Sources (the actual term).

Hmmm. Let’s retitle a few films using Comey’s definition (the actual term):

  • Let’s begin with the 1965 film, The Confidential Human Source Who Came in from the Cold.
  • And what of the James Bond thriller, The Confidential Human Source Who Loved Me?
  • Or more recently, Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Confidential Human Source.

Surely one sees the absurdity of Comey’s subterfuge. “Look over there at the Confidential Human Source”, because he dare not say the word spy. But spy is what the FBI did in the Trump campaign.

However, the new norm for the Left is that spying in the campaign is good, as long as you use Confidential Human Sources.

Flip this script anywhere, and tell me the media and the Democrats aren’t demanding Republican hides for their floors and heads for their den walls. And they would be correct to do so.

Yet the media and Democrat politicos continue their attempts convince Americans that they are cleaner than an operating room.

Still, I suggest to Leftists that they soul-search. Ask themselves the question, “What if Obama orchestrated all that we see today?”

Would they rethink Fast and Furious and other non-scandals that Obama so boastfully claim didn’t happen on his watch? Would they rethink Obama, the Democrats, the Clintons and their “foundation”, the DNC, the media, and the Leftist-run government of the past decades?

I believe many Democrats are currently reconsidering their party. Let’s face it, many made the leap back in 2016, which led to the election of Trump, ergo the mess the Democrats created. But I believe things will get far worse for the Party of Slavery and Oppression.

Obama targeted Donald Trump. Then his Deep State swamp rats tried to oust a sitting president. That is the reality for Democrats, and they need to come to grips with it.

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.