Validating what we already knew, we get confirmation that the FBI colluded with Hillary Clinton’s team in the handling of their investigation.
Recall that the FBI gave preemptive immunity to Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and others. And in a more blatant act of collusion, the FBI investigators claimed not to take notes or videotape Hillary Clinton’s testimony.
Now we get even more shocking revelations that should re-open this investigation, possibly allowing for a new legitimate special counsel.
As Fox News reported,
In a combative exchange at a hearing Friday in Washington, D.C., a federal judge unabashedly accused career State Department officials of lying and signing “clearly false” affidavits to derail a series of lawsuits seeking information about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server and her handling of the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth said he was “shocked” and “dumbfounded” when he learned that FBI had granted immunity to former Clinton chief of staff Cheryl Millsduring its investigation into the use of Clinton’s server, according to a court transcript of his remarks.
“I had myself found that Cheryl Mills had committed perjury and lied under oath in a published opinion I had issued in a Judicial Watch case where I found her unworthy of belief, and I was quite shocked to find out she had been given immunity in — by the Justice Department in the Hillary Clinton email case,” Lamberth said during Friday’s hearing.
The Department of Justice’s Inspector General (IG), Michael Horowitz, noted in his report that it was “inconsistent with typical investigative strategy” for the FBI to allow Mills to sit in during the agency’s interview of Clinton during the email probe, given that classified information traveled through Mills’ personal email account. “[T]here are serious potential ramifications when one witness attends another witness’interview,” the IG wrote.
It doesn’t get any more clear than this.
Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?
What people should be asking is why Mueller continues his farce of Russian collusion, when the evidence is overwhelming of a cover-up?
As you consider what Judge Lamberth said, look at the evidence gathered on FBI insiders close to the investigation.
First there is the obvious Clinton bias. The bureau stacked the investigation with agents who undoubtedly supported Clinton. While there are claims the FBI did its job without prejudice, this information proved wrong with text messages.
Which brings me to the second obvious bias: the text messages. Peter Strzok tried to cover his ass, until the second round of emails showcased his true animus towards Donald Trump. He colluded with Lisa Page, their boss Andrew McCabe, and then enlisted the media’s help.
All this happened under the watchful eye of disgraced former FBI Director James Comey. And what few Leftists are willing to admit, Barack Obama stood at the epicenter, asking for them to keep him apprised.
As I wrote earlier, Mueller doesn’t want to release his finding until after the midterms in order to protect the Democrats. This leaves Democrats with two choices.
When they lose the midterms, the jig is up. If they were to win the midterms (and the won’t), they have no ammunition to stonewall things, given the new information.
The article continues,
On Friday, Lamberth, who was appointed to the bench by President Ronald Reagan, said he did not know Mills had been granted immunity until he “read the IG report and learned that and that she had accompanied [Clinton] to her interview.”
Well now he knows. And I suspect this will be a HUGE story, possibly forcing Mueller to release his report sooner, rather than later.