When people ask how agendas are coordinated, look at this story about the transformation of Barbie.
Apparently, Barbie launched a collection of gender neutral dolls.
According to TipHero,
We all know who Barbie is, but let’s recap: Mattel introduced the popular dolls to the world in 1959, and life has never been the same since. Girls everywhere loved playing with the bendy dolls, whether she was driving her convertible or cooking in her dream house.
Over the years, Barbie has expanded from her blue-eyed, blonde-haired stereotype to different hair colors, eye colors, even diversity and gender (hello, Ken!). And now, Mattel has just taken it one step further in their expansion of Barbie.
Introducing, gender-neutral dolls! The line, called Creatable World, lets kids design their own Barbie doll, without the stereotypes of gender norms. The idea is to eliminate the pigeonholes that Barbie can sometimes dictate.
“In our world, dolls are as limitless as the kids who play with them,” the company said on its website. “Mattel describes Creatable World as a doll line that is designed “to keep labels out and invite everyone in.”
For decades, Barbie symbolized the beauty of women. Right? Some say that Barbie challenged women to embrace their femininity. Many argue that the doll influenced generations of women to find their beauty, inside and out. But those days are long gone.
Now we live in a world where gender is “fluid”. And in an effort to keep their iconic doll in lock-step with the times, Mattel has capitulated to the social justice culture.
Why not just say that Barbie is transgender? For that matter, just claim that Barbie has always been transgendered and the joke is on the men who lusted for her all these years? If that’s the case, perhaps feminists would have to admit the joke’s on them, as the transgender defeat them yet again?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but haven’t Barbie and Ken been “gender-neutral” anyway? Barbie doesn’t have a recognizable vagina, nor Ken a penis. So how more “gender-neutral” can the company make the dolls? Will they all look like the gender-ambiguous “Pat” of SNL fame?
I can’t help but wonder how far Mattel plans to take this? Will there be “Gender-fluid Wrestling Barbie,” for the boys who want to compete
in girls’ athletics? Drag Queen Barbie? Or perhaps Boy-scout Barbie, and for that matter, Girl-scout Ken? Maybe there should be Barbie tampons, for both male and female Barbies, now that schools are teaching
“boys have periods, too.”
According to Kim Culmore, Senior VP of Mattel fashion doll design, “Toys are a reflection of culture and as the world continues to celebrate the positive impact of inclusivity we felt it was time to create a doll line free of labels.”
The New Normal
What Mattel carefully tiptoes around is the fact that this is still seen as a form of child abuse by many experts in the medical community.
Michelle Cretella, M.D., pediatrician and president of the American College of Pediatricians, has a different view of the transgender ideology so heavily promulgated today. She views it as an infection disrupting American politics and our legal systems. “[T]ransgender ideology is not just infecting our laws. It is intruding into the lives of the most innocent among us—children—and with the apparent growing support of the professional medical community,” she wrote for the Daily Signal.
What doctors once treated as a mental illness, the medical community now largely affirms and even promotes as “normal.”
“The transgender movement has gained legs in the medical community and in our culture by offering a deeply flawed narrative,” wrote Cretella. She believes that the transgender movement has opened the door to large-scale child abuse. You can read the actual details debunking the transgender movement’s flawed claims in Dr. Cretella’s full article here.
take our poll - story continues below
Did SCOTUS make the right decision on medical mandates for large businesses?
“These professionals are using the myth that people are born transgender to justify engaging in massive, uncontrolled and unconsented experimentation on children who have a psychological condition that would otherwise resolve after puberty in the vast majority of cases,” warned Cretella. “Today’s institutions that promote transition affirmation are pushing children to impersonate the opposite sex, sending many of them down the path of puberty blockers, sterilization, the removal of healthy body parts, and untold psychological damage.”
When you ask how the gender-fluid nonsense permeating academia fits our lives, I give you gender-neutral Barbie. Barbie’s beauty was more than physical. She represented strength in women, teaching young girls to embrace their God-given feminine essence. Men can never have that power, a power feminists force women to abandon today. Mattel succumbs in order to satisfy the LGBTQ and their bloodlust to destroy the essence of being a woman.
Let’s all make the transgender “woman” feel more like a woman. At the expense of whom?