In what should come as no surprise to anybody with a brain, we learn that Pfizer lied about their vaccine adverse effects.
And you can bet that everybody in the food chain, including Fauci the Fraud and Joey Demento knew about the potential adverse effects of the vaccine they forced on millions of Americans.
Unlike many Conservatives, I have no problem saying, “I TOLD YOU SO!”
I had clowns arguing with me on this point. Their main argument centered around the “science” and the “experts”. Well, I have a Ph.D. in common sense. And I knew from the beginning that the government was lying about Wuflu and vaccines.
The “cure” was indeed more dangerous than the disease. Much more dangerous.
The summary is as follows:
- A small batch of documents released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in mid-November 2021 revealed that in the first three months of the COVID jab rollout, Pfizer received 42,086 adverse event reports that included 1,223 deaths.
- The first really large tranche of Pfizer documents — some 10,000 pages — was released by the FDA March 1, 2022. Included are nine pages of recorded side effects, about 158,000 different health problems in all.
So Pfizer, et al knew early on that the shots were dangerous. These numbers are far greater than those needed to shut down these clinical trials. But Biden’s administration cloaked Pfizer and other snake oil manufacturers under a blanket of immunity.
The summary continues,
- An initial review of case report forms (CRFs) reveal significant data collection errors and anomalies. Problems included patients entered into the “healthy population” group who were far from healthy; serious adverse event (SAE) numbers that were left blank; sample barcodes that were missing; at least one death of a patient the day before being listed as being at a medical checkup; and second doses that were administered outside the three-week protocol window. There also are questions as to whether participants were properly observed for an adequate amount of time; plus adverse events were listed as “not serious” despite extended hospital stay and much more.
- A majority of the CRFs in this release were from Ventavia-run trial sites. Ventavia is currently facing a lawsuit brought by Brook Jackson, a former Ventavia regional director. Jackson was fired shortly after she brought concerns about potential data falsification and poor laboratory management to the attention of the FDA and higher-ups in the company.
I was curious as to what is the protocol when clinical trials go bad. And how many people die during clinical trials.
In researching the second question, I learned that they don’t actually know how many people die during clinical trials. Despite the Left’s cry of “science”, which implies following a scientific method, as it turns out few actually do. Mercola reported:
A clinical trial must report any “serious adverse events” to its institutional review board. As the FDA defines, serious adverse events (SAEs), include: Death; life-threatening harms; hospitalization; disability or permanent damage; birth defects; injuries requiring intervention to prevent impairment; or any other serious event.
If these are the rules, how often are they followed?
“Inadequate and underreporting of trial results, especially safety results, is common,” wrote the authors of a 2015 study published in BMC Medicine. Their analysis of 300 trials with SAEs found that slightly more than a quarter simply did not publish their results, while nearly a third did not correctly publish the number of SAEs. For the remaining trials, 13 percent did not mention SAEs, two percent reported no SAEs, and 16 percent did not report the total number of SAEs per treatment group.
In fact, only 11 percent accurately published and described their serious events. “Although we do not know which the ‘true’ results are, we believe that these discrepancies clearly outline problems in the reporting of SAEs,” concluded the authors.
Pfizer and their enablers had no intention of reporting SAE or anything else negative involving their “death pokes”. Further, these death merchants knew there would be hardly any oversight.
Another 2014 study explored discontinued randomized clinical trials. Here an international team of researchers discovered “discontinuation was common.” Nearly a quarter of all trials ended early, yet little more than a third reported to ethics committees. When they did, the most frequent reason cited for discontinuation was poor recruitment, yet a small percentage (2.4 percent) ended due to “harm,” while the same proportion were aborted for “unknown” reasons.
Run the numbers. Twenty-five percent ended early, but only slightly more than 33% reported to ethics committees.
Back the deaths and more numerical analysis.
In a 2001 paper, Shamoo finds 878 institutional incident reports filed, 41 investigations made, and only 8 deaths reported to the Office for Human Research Protections (among the 70 million human subjects), during a 10-year period ending August 2000. Of the incident reports, he found 44 percent included adverse events.
Because any death, whether occurring in a car crash, by suicide, or as a result of the research itself, must be reported, Shamoo calculates 8 deaths is too small a number for those millions of people and this leads him to the “inescapable conclusion that research institutions supported by the NIH are failing to report, or are not accurately reporting adverse events including deaths.”
Think about that. One can only imagine why anyone would agree to be a human Guinea pig, much less forced to be one. Sadly, leftists don’t plan to abandon their brand of logic anytime soon.