Biden’s record-setting use of pardons is about more than clemency—it’s about protecting a corrupt network. Now, with whispers of pre-emptive pardons, the stakes couldn’t be higher. These pardons aren’t a magnanimous gesture to unify a divided country. Instead, they’re a desperate attempt to shield Biden, his family, and a vast network of Democratic operatives from the consequences of their actions.
Leftists have already begun spinning the narrative, claiming Biden’s pardon deliberations are about protecting democracy from Donald Trump’s “vindictiveness.” But the truth is clear: guilty people don’t need pardons. This isn’t about democracy; it’s about covering up crimes.
Pre-Emptive Pardons: A Leftist Spin Job
Democrats love framing Biden’s actions as noble or necessary to curb Trump’s supposed authoritarian tendencies. But the history doesn’t support this claim.
In 2016, Trump chose to leave Hillary Clinton untouched, despite her criminal misuse of classified information and her role in promoting the Russia collusion hoax. Trump even avoided direct conflict with Barack Obama, though Obama’s holdovers orchestrated a full-blown coup against Trump’s administration.
Now, as Trump fights for a second term, Democrats demand he turn the other cheek again—even after their unprecedented attacks on his presidency, his family, and his supporters. Biden’s talk of pre-emptive pardons isn’t about democracy. It’s about saving the Democratic establishment from accountability for their actions.
Who Needs a Pardon—and Why
The Biden Family
Hunter Biden has become a symbol of unchecked privilege, but the corruption runs much deeper. At least 10 members of the Biden family reportedly benefited financially from Hunter’s foreign business dealings. Joe Biden himself is implicated through emails and whistleblower testimony suggesting he participated in and profited from these schemes.
Pardoning his family is non-negotiable for Biden. Without it, a Republican administration could unravel a web of financial crimes involving money laundering, tax evasion, and potential violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Joe’s brother, James Biden, has been accused of using Joe’s name to secure lucrative business deals, including in healthcare and construction. Frank Biden, another brother, leveraged family connections to gain contracts in energy and real estate. Even Hallie Biden, Hunter’s former partner and Beau Biden’s widow, reportedly received funds tied to Hunter’s schemes. A blanket pardon for the Biden family would bury investigations into whether Joe Biden, “The Big Guy,” personally benefitted from these arrangements, shielding his legacy at the cost of justice.
Fauci, the NIH, and the Covid Lie
Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) played pivotal roles in the Covid-19 disaster. Fauci’s fingerprints are all over gain-of-function research funding at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. His leadership during the pandemic enabled policies that destroyed businesses, trampled civil liberties, and justified unprecedented government overreach.
Fauci weaponized his position, using the HHS and CDC to suppress dissent and promote false narratives. Pardons for Fauci and other NIH officials would shield them from accountability for misleading the public, mishandling funds, and contributing to a crisis that cost trillions of dollars and disrupted global stability.
Liz Cheney and the J6 Cover-Up
Liz Cheney, once the darling of establishment Republicans, became the public face of the January 6 Committee. The committee’s goal wasn’t justice—it was to cement a narrative that Trump supporters are a threat to democracy. Behind the scenes, the FBI, media, and social platforms orchestrated this cover-up of election interference and government overreach.
Cheney is emblematic of J6’s bigger lie: the event was not an insurrection but a peaceful protest against a stolen election. Pardons for Cheney and her allies would erase accountability for the most brazen political smear campaign in modern history.
The FBI’s Rogue Agents
The FBI’s involvement in targeting Trump is undeniable. Kevin Clinesmith, already convicted for falsifying FISA warrants, is just the tip of the iceberg. Figures like James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok, and Lisa Page weaponized the bureau to undermine Trump through false narratives and leaks.
How many lower-level agents, supervisors, and analysts played roles in this operation? Biden’s pardons would prevent the full extent of FBI corruption from ever being exposed.
The Intelligence Community and the “51 Experts”
James Clapper, John Brennan, and other intelligence officials signed the now-debunked letter claiming Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian disinformation.” This blatant election interference wasn’t just dishonest; it was a coordinated effort to protect Biden.
But it wasn’t just the big names. How many mid-level intelligence officers contributed to disseminating misinformation, leaking classified material, or building false narratives? Pardoning the 51 intelligence officials who misled the American public about the laptop would normalize election interference by those sworn to protect the nation.
Pardons for these individuals would validate the intelligence community’s meddling in domestic politics and set a dangerous precedent for future elections.
Judges and the Weaponized Judiciary
Judges like Juan Merchan, who presided over the Trump Organization case, and Lewis Kaplan, who ruled against Trump in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation case, are emblematic of a judiciary that has been co-opted for political purposes.
FISA court judges who rubber-stamped fraudulent surveillance warrants are equally complicit. Pardons for these judges would ensure that judicial activism and corruption go unpunished.
Jean Carroll and Michael Cohen
Jean Carroll’s dubious accusations against Trump culminated in a courtroom victory that many view as politically motivated. Similarly, Michael Cohen, Trump’s disgraced former lawyer, flipped on his former boss to secure a lighter sentence. Pardoning these figures would be Biden’s way of rewarding those who weaponized legal proceedings against Trump.
Media and Social Media Enablers
Legacy media outlets and social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook played critical roles in suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story and amplifying anti-Trump narratives. Executives and editors colluded with government agencies to manipulate public discourse, violate First Amendment rights, and shape the 2020 election outcome.
Figures like Jeff Zucker at CNN and Rachel Maddow at MSNBC amplified disinformation against Trump while burying legitimate stories about Biden corruption. Social media executives Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg went further, actively suppressing the Hunter laptop story and censoring dissenting voices under the guise of combating “misinformation.”
Pardons for these individuals would shield them from accountability for their role in undermining democracy.
What Pre-Emptive Pardons Mean for America
If Biden issues pre-emptive pardons, it will confirm what many Americans already suspect: the Democratic Party weaponized every institution it could to destroy Trump and suppress dissent.
These pardons won’t just protect individual wrongdoers. They’ll validate the largest coordinated political crime in U.S. history—a conspiracy involving the FBI, DOJ, intelligence agencies, media, social platforms, and even the judiciary.
As Adam Kinzinger once said, “Guilty people don’t need pardons.” Biden’s actions would prove just how many guilty people he’s trying to protect—and how much he fears a return to justice.
For a president already setting records for pardons, these pre-emptive acts would be the final nail in the coffin for America’s rule of law. They’d signal that power, not principle, reigns supreme, and that the American justice system is nothing more than a tool for the political elite.
