What Took So Long, Adam Schiff?

Weasel Congressman Adam Schiff finally released information he promised months ago.

It took Acting Director of National Intelligence to prompt Schiff to give up the goods. And Schiff wasted no time in spinning his delay:

Adding to Schiff’s fake news narrative are the facts. Like this tweet regarding comments made by former DNI James Clapper.

But Schiff faces a bigger problem. Guilty men don’t release unredacted documents. And that just what President Trump did:

Partial transcript:

Blitzer: Breaking news on the Russian investigation. The president is asking the Director of National Intelligence and the FBI to release unredacted classified documents and text messages related to the start of the Russia investigation.

I don’t know many guilty people who ask for unredacted formerly classified documents to be released. And while President Trump’s release is “selective”, the information speaks to the origins of the FBI’s bogus investigation of Carter Page.

While the fruit of the poison tree provides some protection of the President and his satellites, he appears to be more interested in showing how the Obama-era Justice Department worked.

In the interview, Wolf Blitzer positioned the release, stressing the “classified” nature of the information. Clearly Blitzer implies that Trump erred in releasing “classified” information, though he adds, “the president can release whatever he wants”. Nevertheless, expect this to be the next Democrat talking point: Trump released classified information.

Still, the information proves damning.

And not just because Carter Page never should have been targeted. Further, not just because the entirety of Mueller’s role was fabricated by Democrats over bogus information.

No, the real problem for Schiff and other coup co-conspirators is what the 53 transcripts exposed about the Russian ruse. Former Obama officials were forced to admit privately, under oath that they participated in a fake news media scam. Many Obama administration officials admitted their claims in their TV appearances about “collusion” were nonsense. Those claims had no basis in reality.

Sean Davis of The Federalist documented one example of the Russian collusion disinformation campaign by the Obama administration:

Former Obama administration defense official Evelyn Farkas testified under oath that she lied during an MSNBC interview when she claimed to have evidence of alleged collusion, a newly declassified congressional transcript of her testimony shows. Farkas testified before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on June 26, 2017, as part of the committee’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election between Donald Trump and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Lawmakers keyed in on an appearance Farkas made on MSNBC on March 2, 2017, in which she urged intelligence community bureaucrats to disseminate within the government and potentially even leak to media any incriminating information they had about Trump or his aides.

“I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama administration] people who left…[that] it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy,” Farkas said.

How’s this for coincidence surrounding Russia and Ukraine?

The article illuminates:

Farkas, who served in the Obama administration as the deputy assistant secretary of Defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia from 2012 through 2015, also claimed that administration officials appointed by Trump might even destroy evidence of alleged collusion if they “found out how we knew what we knew about the Trump staff’s dealing with Russians.”

They might “try to compromise those sources and methods,” Farkas alleged in the MSNBC interview. “And we would no longer have access to that intelligence.”

“Not enough was coming out into the open and I knew there was more,” Farkas claimed.

While testifying to Congress, Farkas admitted what she actually knew:

As evidenced by her answers, Farkas knew nothing about Russian collusion. Because there was none.

Farkas was just one more Obama administration minion doing her part in the attempted takedown of President Trump.

Think John Durham isn’t grilling Farkas over her obvious attempt to mislead the public? And how many more of these intentional misinformation minions understand what’s coming for them? They are all on record.

We may never know the actual count of conspirators who tried to take out Trump. But what we do know is these days many of these low-level operatives are singing like canaries.

Democrats now try two tactics. Schiff and Comey for example try to confront the allegations head on. Meanwhile, Brennan hasn’t tweeted for weeks.

Sadly for all these traitors, neither strategy will work. Soon America will know the level Democrats willingly go to maintain power.


Copy */
Back to top button