Despite all efforts by Democrats to the contrary, Donald Trump will win his rightful second term as president. And I explained why not that long ago.
Trump is a known and proven entity. On the other hand, Kamala Harris is not.
Well, that’s not totally true. Harris was voted the “Most Progressive Senator”, and that distinction was not a compliment. So what people do know about Harris hinders her as a candidate. But when juxtaposed to Trump, the differences couldn’t be more glaring.
In my article about Trump, I contended that Trump’s fan base is more sticky, because his supporters won’t learn anything negative that’s new about Trump. But they will learn more positive. And the fact that Trump doesn’t vacillate or equivocate on positions speaks volumes. Trump can be trusted.
But what of Harris?
In The Huffington Post, former Obama adviser David Axelrod attempted to run interference for Harris, post CNN interview. They wrote:
Democratic strategist David Axelrod said late Thursday that he doesn’t think voters know much about Vice President Harris and whether or not the Democratic presidential nominee’s policy views have changed much over the years.
Axelrod joined CNN for a panel following Harris’s first televised interview since she ascended to the top of the Democratic ticket.
The interview was seen as a high-stakes moment during which she could share her policies, after being criticized by the right for her lack of media appearances.
She’s also been criticized for shifting on policy issues including fracking and decriminalizing the border. Harris was adamant during the interview that her values had not changed.
“First of all, I don’t know how much voters are sitting around thinking about this,” Axelrod said about Harris’s response. “They don’t know much about her, honestly. They’re gaining information about her all the time.”
Axelrod added that voters have spent the last month being flooded with information about the vice president.
He also said he thinks average voters aren’t concerned about whether or not she has changed her stance on certain issues since she ran in the Democratic primary in 2020.
It may be a bigger issue to reporters and those who are undecided, he said.
Indeed Americans have been flooded with information. About Harris.
And in the afterglow of her ascension post-coup of Joe Biden, Harris rode as high on the horse as she will ride. Because all negative revelations to come will feature Harris and Tampon Tim.
While the media continues to project this Pollyanna vision of Harris-Walz, the reality has begun to set in for many Americans. The stark reality of Biden’s presidency and Harris’ incompetence won’t bode well for the Black-Indian-Lactating-Human who wants to lead the free world. And Harris did herself no favors in her CNN interview.
Harris is not likeable. Despite her attempting to laugh at about everything, when she takes on a more serious tone, two things emerge:
- She’s truly ignorant.
- She’s a tyrant.
Back to Axelrod.
The Left want to sell Harris as steady, stable. So what it appears that Harris flip-flops on almost every issue, that’s just her nuanced way of being the same person.
In 2019 Harris said she would ban fracking. Today, she’s all for fracking. When asked what changed, Harris replied, “Nothing.” Except her MIND!
If Harris changed her mind on fracking, then she should just say so. “I see that my original view was a mistake, thus”. However, Harris equivocates. She implies that it’s not her mind that’s changed, but things changed that allowed her to keep her core opinion the same on the matter without having to admit being wrong and thus she’s now pro-fracking.
Did you get that? Ok, let’s try this.
Harris can never be wrong. In her view, she never has to change her mind, as circumstances changed. Ergo, circumstances are wrong, thus, her original position can remain intact.
There, now you get it. Right?
