Another Trump Win: Asylum Seekers Kicked Back to Mexico

#TeamKJ, #KevinJackson

Asylum seekers all have one thing in common: they hope to make themselves comfy in the US while waiting to make their appeals to the powers that be.

But Trump just scored a win for the home front, as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed to send refugees back to Mexico to wait for decision day.

You can bet nothing twists the panties of a leftist faster than three little words: Trump wins again. So, it is with great joy we chronicle yet another huge victory for the President.

Fox News elaborates:

The court order reversed a decision by a San Francisco judge that would have blocked the policy — giving President Trump a temporary victory on immigration.

The case must still be considered on its merits at a lower court in San Francisco and could end up at the Supreme Court.

U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg ruled April 8 that the policy should be halted while a lawsuit, filed on behalf of 11 asylum applicants and several other organizations, proceeds.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the suit along with the Southern Poverty Law Center, and Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, said that despite the ruling, “there is good reason to believe that ultimately this policy will be put to a halt.”

“Asylum seekers are being put at serious risk of harm every day that the forced return policy continues,” Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, said in a statement. “Notably, two of the three judges that heard this request found that there are serious legal problems with what the government is doing.”

Let’s get real.

Leftists aren’t truly worried about the migrants seeking asylum. They didn’t care when Obama kept “kids in cages.” Nor did they care when Obama separated families and demanded stricter vetting at the border. They only pretend to care now so they can stick it to Donald Trump.

take our poll - story continues below

Did Trump Go Too Far With His "Democrats Don't Like It Here, They Can Leave" Quote?

  • Did Trump Go Too Far With His "Democrats Don't Like It Here, They Can Leave" Quote?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to The Black Sphere updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Video Draft Is Trump Racist

#TeamKJ, #KevinJackson

In fact, shortly after Trump ascended into the Oval Office, Joey Salads illustrated just how artificial the leftist outrage really is.

I wrote at the time:

The loving and tolerant Left is known for practicing what they preach, right?

So when the Berkeley rioters showed their outrage over President Trump’s Muslim refugee travel, we would figure they would be ready to take on the responsibilities that comes with anarchy.

Thanks to Joey Salads, we get to witness the humanity and charity of leftists first-hand. Salads, a video prankster, went undercover as a leftist to highlight the real leftist attitude. He wanted to know how deep the opposition to President Trump’s travel ban is, so he went to LAX.

Watch as he confronts a few protesters, asking them to put their house keys where their protest signs are.

I’m sure you’re shocked to find that when Salads ask who wants a refugee to live with them, he finds many protesters who believe in, “Not in my house!”

According to The Blaze:

Approaching a group of protesters sitting on a ledge at LAX, Salads introduces himself as a member of an outfit that “just got approved by the commissioner of naturalization.”

He then asks if any protesters would be willing to “give donations or to possibly offer shelter.”

Salads’ first victim says, “I have no resources. Sorry.”

A second guy writes in a “small donation” on the clipboard, Salads notes in the video, but declines to offer shelter.

Another guy says he’s “not able to do that” when asked to provide shelter to refugees.

“I live with a man who is a Trump supporter,” one woman replies. “So I don’t think he’d go for it.”

Apparently, no protesters have occupancy for even ONE refugee.

One woman expressed concerns over being a single woman living alone. Her concerns were about being raped or murdered. But couldn’t that happen in regular society? And after all, this would be a humanitarian rape or murder, would it not?

I’m sure many Americans have the same fears?

Here’s the next guy. He seemed concerned that supporting the refugee could be indefinite. Again, this might be the same issue that taxpaying Americans have. So, I surmise that #StongerTogether for this particular gentleman means at YOUR house, not his. At the very least, his refugee humanity would have an expiration date.

Again, not one person on the video wanted to welcome a stranger into their home. They complained about cost, potential harm, even language issues. These are all the same issues Americans who want to vet refugees have voiced.

What this proves is, it’s easy to join a protest, especially if you’re paid. Make signs, roil up passers-by, and create your hashtags. But for leftists, that’s as far as it goes.

Leftists leave the real humanity to conservatives. Moreover, they’ve been doing it for decades, and we are tired of footing the bill–and other outcomes.

 Two years later, nothing’s changed.

The leftist hypocrisy grows deeper and wider with each passing day. The latest lawsuit, filed on behalf of nearly a dozen asylum seekers, hopes to prove Trump policies break the law. However, this is going to turn out just like the Mueller Report. A lot of time and money wasted just to prove Trump is right.

According to the Trump administration, these policies aim to manage the border crisis. Currently, immigration officials are over-whelmed with thousands of migrants fleeing poverty and violence in Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras. But asylum law wasn’t actually created for such purposes.

Fox continues:

Asylum law, conservatives point out, is intended to shield individuals from near-certain death or persecution on account of limited factors like religious or political affiliation — not poor living conditions and economic despair.

Most asylum applicants are ultimately rejected for having an insufficient or unfounded personalized fear of persecution, following a full hearing of their case before an asylum officer or an immigration judge.

In other words, if these people want to migrate to the United States, get in line Jack. Follow the process. Trump won’t have it any other way.

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.